• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Boy dies after being shot in door-knocking prank gone wrong

The Brad Dad

Brad’s favorite dad
Banned
Suspended
Joined
Jun 19, 2025
Messages
9,029
Reaction score
9,130
Location
Cali
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I think its perfectly appropriate to punish a child for engaging in this behavior. It's not only disconcerting, and disruptive to his neighbors, it can be a serious problem for people who are older, or disabled to get up and down.

I was thinking grounding him as a possible option, but 'grounding' forever?
 
I think its perfectly appropriate to punish a child for engaging in this behavior. It's not only disconcerting, and disruptive to his neighbors, it can be a serious problem for people who are older, or disabled to get up and down.

I was thinking grounding him as a possible option, but 'grounding' forever?

Bruh
 

Thanks to the bravery and quick action by this good guy with a gun.

Shooting at a fleeing, unarmed child no longer on your property who woke you up at night does not fall even under the most charitable interpretation of either the Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground self defense exceptions to criminal homicide. I hope the man who did this is charged to the fullest extent of the law.
 
FAFO


ACCEPTABLE COLLATERAL DAMAGE for the GLORIOUS FREEDOM of our SACROSANCT 2nd AMENDMENT!!!

When things like this happen, this kind of response always interests me.

Gun ownership isn't new or particularly less regulated. In fact, more homes in 1960 owned a gun than they do now. The question then is what happened? Did things like this always happen and the only reason it's major cause of concern now is because we're all oversocialized via mass media? Did these things not happen and in-fact the rise in gun violence is more likely correlated to a loss in social trust and a deterioration of the social fabric, rather than gun ownership itself?

I tend to agree with conservatives when they say that extensive gun legislation seems more like a lazy, half-baked punishment than an actual coherent policy. It might work to reduce gun deaths, but would it actually solve the malaise undergirding the issue?
 
I think its perfectly appropriate to punish a child for engaging in this behavior. It's not only disconcerting, and disruptive to his neighbors, it can be a serious problem for people who are older, or disabled to get up and down.

I was thinking grounding him as a possible option, but 'grounding' forever?
Homeowner had to kill him. How else he gonna learn?
 
Shooting at a fleeing, unarmed child no longer on your property who woke you up at night does not fall even under the most charitable interpretation of either the Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground self defense exceptions to criminal homicide. I hope the man who did this is charged to the fullest extent of the law.
How true that is.
What these kids are doing is wrong, very wrong. They think it is a dare, a joke. They don't realize that they are very annoying and that their actions obviously can have consequences.
That doesn't give anyone the right to shoot at them, esp not as they are running away.

Many gun rights advocates will probably come to the shooter's defense. I have only read posts up to this.
They will call him a hero and think he was well within his rights.
Was he, really? A life snuffed out!

This one is a hero, he should be recognized as such, apologized to, commended
In June, police in Chandler, Arizona, released video footage of a group of juveniles committing the "Door Kicking Challenge,'' alleging the group pulled the prank on the same home at least 18 times, prompting the homeowner to move out.
Am I right in assuming he was not a chest thumping gun fanatic?

Now I will ask myself an important question. Would I have the patience to have that happen to me 18 times? I will try to be very honest with myself.
How about y'all?
 
Shooting at a fleeing, unarmed child no longer on your property who woke you up at night does not fall even under the most charitable interpretation of either the Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground self defense exceptions to criminal homicide. I hope the man who did this is charged to the fullest extent of the law.
I wonder if the boys parents wished the guy had a baseball bat instead of a gun here.
 
Theres plenty of ways to get this kid to stop besides using a ****ing gun! Odds are authorities and a ring doorbell will scare em off.
 
How true that is.
What these kids are doing is wrong, very wrong. They think it is a dare, a joke. They don't realize that they are very annoying and that their actions obviously can have consequences.
That doesn't give anyone the right to shoot at them, esp not as they are running away.

Many gun rights advocates will probably come to the shooter's defense. I have only read posts up to this.
They will call him a hero and think he was well within his rights.
Was he, really? A life snuffed out!

This one is a hero, he should be recognized as such, apologized to, commended

Am I right in assuming he was not a chest thumping gun fanatic?

Now I will ask myself an important question. Would I have the patience to have that happen to me 18 times? I will try to be very honest with myself.
How about y'all?

I'd just remove my door bell and not answer the door if they knock. Let my dogs hang out in the yard more. Get a camera or a few in case of future shenanigans.
 
Shooting at a fleeing, unarmed child no longer on your property who woke you up at night does not fall even under the most charitable interpretation of either the Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground self defense exceptions to criminal homicide. I hope the man who did this is charged to the fullest extent of the law.

Hear! Hear! (y)

You wrote it, before I could.
 
That is awful. :(
 
Got a hammer every problem looks like a nail.
 
Hear! Hear! (y)

You wrote it, before I could.

I couldnt tell from the article if he was still on the property or not. Either way, that guy's going to jail. Even in TX, that aint justified.
 
Shooting at a fleeing, unarmed child no longer on your property who woke you up at night does not fall even under the most charitable interpretation of either the Castle Doctrine or Stand Your Ground self defense exceptions to criminal homicide. I hope the man who did this is charged to the fullest extent of the law.
Post #8

If this man isn't prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law we'll know we've arrived at one of those pivotal moments in our society.
 
When things like this happen, this kind of response always interests me.

Gun ownership isn't new or particularly less regulated. In fact, more homes in 1960 owned a gun than they do now. The question then is what happened? Did things like this always happen and the only reason it's major cause of concern now is because we're all oversocialized via mass media? Did these things not happen and in-fact the rise in gun violence is more likely correlated to a loss in social trust and a deterioration of the social fabric, rather than gun ownership itself?

I tend to agree with conservatives when they say that extensive gun legislation seems more like a lazy, half-baked punishment than an actual coherent policy. It might work to reduce gun deaths, but would it actually solve the malaise undergirding the issue?

I think this has always been happening.

I was an avid newspaper reader since my paperboy days, well before the internet and cable-tv. I always remember stories like this in my city, usually involving parents shooting their own kids, or relatives, neighbors, or lost drunks.

That this guy shot a young kid in the back at some distance in the public street, while the kid was running away, is a bit unusual though. The stories I remember usually took place in the inside, or immediately at a door or window.

One of the saddest stories I remember is of a father shooting his teenage kid in the dark, as the kid was slipping through a window he jimmied to regain entry into his own family house.

It turns-out the kid snuck-out at night to drink with his teenage friends, and his pops thought he was a prowler as the kid tried to sneak back into the house in the middle of the night. The old man never knew the kid had left. He turned on the light after having fired-away in the dark, only to realize that he had shot his own kid!

This was decades ago, and I don't remember if the kid was shot fatally. i was a teenage when this occurred, and it was very relatable. Like the teenage victim, I wasn't adverse to sneaking-out at night, crawling back-in through a basement window! And yes, the men in my family were vets and had firearms, which I'm sure they would use if they believed the need arose!
 
Back
Top Bottom