• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Border Meltdown: Obama Delivering 290,000 Illegals To U.S. Homes


Does it state anywhere that they have a right to enter another country? It's easy to leave a country without invading another country. All you have to do is go out to sea or one of the Earths Poles. But I'll bet you a years worth of DP donation that no where does it say that one person from one country has a right to enter another country without that countries permission.
 

I perused it a little further. I didn't notice any right to invade someone else's country, nor did I notice any mention of any right to expecting someone else to pay your bills.
 
Scene from Murrieta, CA today, about 15 minutes from my home.

The anti-illegal immigration crowd again successfully prevented a busloads of illegals from getting through-this is the 3rd time. Our counties infectious disease specialists are working non stop, and we are dealing with a particularly dangerous type of TB known as multi-drug resistant TB. TB requireds months of 4-5 heavy duty antibiotics, the mdr version is even more. This is potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars to treat for each person.

Of course, the racist left-wing group La-Raza, who thinks California is actually a part of Mexico-then referred to the black protesters as "token".

Third group of migrants sent to San Diego - San Diego, California News Station - KFMB Channel 8 - cbs8.com
 
This is the only way the most powerful country in the world, militarily, can be defeated. It's what the Chinese did in Tibet and what the Muslims are doing in Western Europe. They go around the military and directly into the population. Demographics takes care of the rest.
 
That would be illegal under laws passed while bush* was president.

Ironic how the same people who furiously claim that Obama ignores the law are furiously insisting that Obama ignore the law
Is Obama not our President, NOW?
 

I agree. WE DONT WANT THIS, and our govt is ignoring us. Obama wants voters. This will get him an immediate boost amongst hispanics, and loyal democrats when these guys become citizens in years. Nevermind the costs, health concerns, economy, and the legal immigration system that has been completely bypassed. My father came here legally-after waiting for years to get here-and these punks show up at a fence and get right in? Its not right on so many levels.

Our president should be impeached.
 
That would be illegal under laws passed while bush* was president.

Ironic how the same people who furiously claim that Obama ignores the law are furiously insisting that Obama ignore the law

It sure wasn't illegal during the Eisenhower administration was it ?

I believe President Eisenhower read the Constitution and upheld his oath of office as POTUS.
 
Is Obama not our President, NOW?

Yes he is, a very incompetent President who ignores the oath of office he took (twice in one day back in 2009) and ignores the Constitution and refuses to enforce what laws are on the books he doesn't like.

I think Obama has crossed the line and has committed treason. He's aiding and abetting the drug cartels, the invasion from Latin America not to mention that Al Qaeda is being decimated and is on the run. :lamo
 
ABC news did a piece stating less than 20 % of these South American refugees are complying with the law in terms of reporting to government offices as directed. so they are breaking our laws before they change clothes and why is the media not talking about the diseases these people are carrying?
 
Which part of "laws passed while bush* was president" did you not understand?


Wow! Even after all these years it's still the fault of George Bush. This fallback position never seems to get old for the haplessly indoctrinated leftists.
 
Which part of "laws passed while bush* was president" did you not understand?

Are you referring to the law written by an open borders pro illegal immigration liberal Congressman named Howard Berman (liberal D) ?

Unlike Obama, former Presidents like Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, LBJ, etc. would singe bills into law that Congress passed. Where as Obama always threatens vetoing bills and ignores what laws that Congress has passed that he doesn't like.

Obama likes Berman's bill that allows Obama to not to deport illegal aliens and allows him to relocate hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens throughout America at the taxpayers expense.

This is not a crises, it was all planned by the Obama administration as we found out it was going on before January of this year.

This is an invasion and Obama is aiding and abetting the invasion. That's treason.
 
Wow! Even after all these years it's still the fault of George Bush. This fallback position never seems to get old for the haplessly indoctrinated leftists.

I didn't say anything was anyone's fault. I just noted the hypocrisy of those who complain about Obama not following the law while also complaining that Obama is following the law.
 

I'm talking about the bill bush* signed

Which word did you not understand?
 
I'm talking about the bill bush* signed

Which word did you not understand?

That's exactly the bill I'm referring to. It was sponsored by a pro illegal alien liberal Democrat.

Unlike Obama, G.W. Bush and every President before him didn't write the laws of our country, that's Congress job. It's the job of POTUS to enforce those laws or be impeached and kicked out of office.

BTW: This may be news for you but G.W. Bush was a pro amnesty kind of guy. Don't you remember back in 2006 when the American people spoke and the phone system in DC collapsed and the McCain-Kennedy amnesty bill was defeated ? I remember. The American people said NO !
 

That was a lot to get out. It's good for the soul. But you better start learning Spanish.
 

Yet how many times has the United States done exactly that? And guess what, it has consequences, and immigration is one ... in the case of Mexico it started when we took half of its territory.
 
Yet how many times has the United States done exactly that? And guess what, it has consequences, and immigration is one ... in the case of Mexico it started when we took half of its territory.

Oh, so you're position is that we are at war with Mexico and thus this invasion (from all the countries of South America) is justified? Well then, let slip the dogs of war.
 
That would be illegal under laws passed while bush* was president.

Ironic how the same people who furiously claim that Obama ignores the law are furiously insisting that Obama ignore the law

Precisely which law?
 
Yet how many times has the United States done exactly that? And guess what, it has consequences, and immigration is one ... in the case of Mexico it started when we took half of its territory.

Under the Laws of Nations, Mexico never had soverignty over what is California, Neveda, Arizona and western Mew Mexico today. The Californios gave up on Mexico by the 1830's and wanted to become a British colony or become a territory of the United States. Why do you think California's Mexican Governor and military leaders surrended to Americans six times ?
 
See: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all signed by the US and Mexico. Does it make immigration laws void? No.

So, once again you confirm that this "fundamental right of movement" is not how you describe it and your argument is debunked. Why keep returning to the dry well?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…