Grokmaster
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,613
- Reaction score
- 2,735
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.
You just found this story. Gotta do better than that. You're rehashing old news and putting your spin on it. Nice try.
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.
Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...
So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?
Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.
Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News
One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."
Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...
Old news that was just uncovered. Heads may yet roll .....
LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?
The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.
My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
Against the people [underlings] who perpetrated this fraud... maybe. Obama and Hillary? probably not.LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?
The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.
My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
Against the people [underlings] who perpetrated this fraud... maybe. Obama and Hillary? probably not.
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.
Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...
So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?
Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.
Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News
One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."
Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...
This is a lie.So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
There was no fraud. Try reading.Against the people [underlings] who perpetrated this fraud... maybe. Obama and Hillary? probably not.
This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.So Lynch ordered the "stand down" on her own?
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.
Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf
The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".
The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.
As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.
This is a lie.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.
More propaganda by the usual suspects.
There was no fraud. Try reading.
This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.
LOL!! Don't you know by now it only a "BOMBSHELL" if it's about Trump?
The Trump haters don't care...not even the conservative Trump haters who also hated Obama.
My hope is that the new AG will think this is enough of a bombshell to take action.
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.
Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf
The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".
The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.
As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.
This is a lie.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.
More propaganda by the usual suspects.
There was no fraud. Try reading.
This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.
It's not a bombshell if we've known about it for 4 years. Nor is it news.
FYI, Clintin isn't running in 2020. AOC won't be eligible to run until 2028. You all better start worrying about someone else.
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.
Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf
The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".
The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.
As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.
So, Comey and the Obama Swamp KGB-FBI/DOJ were FOLLOWING ORDERS from the Obama White House when they failed to charge Hillary Clinton for OBVIOUS CRIMES, and the "insurance policy" WAS/IS THE WITCH HUNT, with NO SIGNIFIICANT EVIDENCE to INITIATE IT, as the more sentient among us have been saying for over TWO YEARS...as the RELEASED TRANSCRIPTS of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page's SWORN TESTIMONY REVEALS.
Gee...looks like the Tarmac Meeting was to give Slick Willie word that "the FIX WAS IN"...
So , let's talk about what "OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE" actually is, and SEDITION , as well, shall we?
Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page admitted under questioning from Texas Republican Rep. John Ratcliffe last summer that "the FBI was ordered by the Obama DOJ not to consider charging Hillary Clinton for gross negligence in the handling of classified information," the congressman alleged in a social media post late Tuesday, citing a newly unearthed transcript of Page's closed-door testimony.
Lisa Page admitted Obama DOJ ordered stand-down on Clinton email prosecution, GOP rep says | Fox News
One of the biggest revelations was that Page, who was having an affair with then-FBI agent Peter Strzok, said that the infamous "insurance policy" text message was referring to the Russia investigation. "During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at 'total breakneck speed' and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn't be elected anyway," Fox News reported. "Further, she confirmed investigators only had a 'paucity' of evidence at the start."
Obama DOJ Told FBI Not To Charge Hillary, Lisa Page Reveals What The 'Insurance Policy' Was | Daily Wire
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's see if Barr pursues THESE EXPOSED OUTRAGES...
“Sentient?”
:lamo
Uh-huh. I didn't realize that LISA PAGE was "far right wing", or that her SWORN TESTIMONY was "rantings and ravings".Far right wing rantings and ravings screaming at the top of their voices to each other and getting increasingly worked up and angry.
Nothing to see here.
Deflection? :lamo
As usual, the facts are nothing like the accusation.
Here's the transcript: https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa Page interview Day 1.pdf
The beginning of the line of questioning begins on Page 93. Lisa Page CLEARLY states the FBI had no way of rebutting Clinton's claim regarding intent. They ultimately examined whether they could bring a mishandling case. They considered gross negligence, but could not make a case out of it because, according to Richard Scott (not Loretta Lynch or anyone higher in the Department), it was "Constitutionally vague" and "it had either never been done or had only been done once like 99 years ago". Thus the prosecutors "did not feel that they could sustain a charge".
The FBI then had the Department of Justice pull EVERY mishandling case in the previous 30 years, to see if they could create a criminal charge out of that.
As usual, the propagandists are lying to people.
This is a lie.
What is there to take action on? The FBI and DOJ, according to the transcript, did exactly what they are supposed to do.
More propaganda by the usual suspects.
There was no fraud. Try reading.
This is a lie. There was no "stand down" and Comey did not consult with Lynch. The transcript clearly states it was Richard Scott.
Uh-huh. I didn't realize that LISA PAGE was "far right wing", or that her SWORN TESTIMONY was "rantings and ravings".
Everything we suspected has been verified by the Witch Hunt's OWN WITNESS.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?