• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Black Caucus: Whites Not Allowed

Cold Dirt

Banned
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
370
Reaction score
18
Location
GA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Liberal
This is hilarious, liberals here love to think that the democratic party isnt full of racists...yet the biggest black liberal caucus proves them wrong....again........

What if this was a group of rich white conservative politicians that wouldn't allow a black conservative member to join?.....they would be labeled racist by the same people that think its OK for a rich black liberal democrats to show bigotry to a white liberal.........

Come on those who love to use the race card here......tell us how these racist liberals and part of the democratic party, justified this blatant racist denial of a white liberal into their ranks because of his skin color...................


The Politico

 
White Caucus : Blacks not allowed

Imagine the uprorar from those that are silent re: whites not allowed in the Black Causcus
 
wonder where champ and jallman are to defend racists like these then tell us that there are no racists in the democratic party........
 
White Power![YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp_jBZ6ikTM[/YOUTUBE]
 
The Black Caucas is for integration except when it comes to them..Can you say HYPOCRITES????
 
I do not believe that any person is better than anyone else by virtue of their Race, Color, Background or Religion and I suspect that those who have posted before me on this thread think likewise.
Should they have a different belief than what I am saying is fairly pointless to them.
The only reason a club, however exclusive is set up, is to propose views that are in agreement with all club members, thus one has / had those who espouse racism such as the KKK or the Neo-Nazis.
On the other side we have this so called Black Caucus.
All these clubs have the same ideal in common, namely promotion of their own beliefs, those beliefs to be exposed to as many of their adherents as possible, as well as influencing those who actions may be pursuaded to enhance their beliefs to their advantage.
In setting up a Black Caucus these people are guilty of the practise of Racism as much if not more than those of the KKK or Neo-Nazi's, in fact there is little to distinguish between either side.
Prejudice and Racism is practised as much by the Black Caucus as it is by the KKK or Neo-Nazi and it is to most people equally distasteful.
The fact that these Black Politicians can be freely elected largely by virtue of
White Politicians recognising that all people ARE created equal and enforcing that Constitutional Law.
It is not surprising that this Caucus has been set up, as it was no no surprise to see the KK or Neo-Nzi clubs, each particular club wishing to force it's particular viewpoint onto society.
Unless and until people learn that it is their best interests to cooperate with each other we shall continue to have dissent within our society.
Having divergent views is natural and will continue, but divergent views because of Race, Religion, Background or Color will in the end be the cause of our downfall.
 

Good post other than the part about people that has posted before you......

I am far from being a racist, a my 7 month old son godfather is a black man that saved my ***...twice.....in Iraq.

I dont however see racism alive and well in this country on both sides and against many different minorities...........

But for some liberals here to claim...champ and jallman....that there is no racism in the democrat party is just pure bunk and nothing but a pack of lies told by liars
 

I demand reparations!
 
It's a relatively minor point, and largely a matter of semantics, but, strictly speaking, the Congressional Black Caucus is not racist.

Racism is a belief that one race is inherently superior, genetically, to another, ie that the "other" race is not...quite...fully human.

Bigotry, on the other hand, is simply a dislike for, and a desire to not associate with, another race.

The congressional black caucus is bigoted, not racist.
 

Not allowing someone to join because they are white is indeed racist....they are basing their decision based on race.....
 
bump for champ......come on buddy....I know you have seen this thread....why you hiding from it like a little sissy?????

please lie to us some more and tell us that this is not racism in the democrat party...................


you lied and said you liberals got rid of all the lefty wacko's yet the racist blacks within your party rears its ugly head once agin.....
 
Please don't act like the Republican Party is full of EOE humane individuals seeking American and human solidarity. Americans have this nasty reality of solely viewing within black and white. Worst if your skin tone isn't "primary".

Liberals see this disorder and use it for their means within social and political avenues in minority but not collective because that would be stereotyping.

Conservatives will not confront this disorder, rather mock it and avoid until ones true feelings come forth within societal banter i.e. George Allen of recent. Seems, given Conservatives wish to be separate and not individual thinkers, that is collective.

Both are serious disorders my country doesn't need any longer but for you Sir, not to see this disorder within Republican avenues, is like notioning Cancer doesn't kill nor is it a primary medical concern.

This is one of the more "balanced" political forums for all to share and emphasize towards. That realization isn't shared else where including chat forums, where a person's God given skin tone and Republican pride if not of "primary", may be attack at a higher percentage without any form of negative confrontation if any deserves racial inferior enmity.

I will combat next to you Sir on how you feel but I cannot blind myself into believing the Republican Party in majority, doesn't have the same disorder you are foolishly deeming a Liberal problem.

If you conceive colors as a form of human identification, you are continuing the problem in America and not finding a valid end solution. Yes, I have mentioned this notion toward others regardless of their outside human appearance. I use "Sir", and "Ma'am", and other humane respects. I typically ask someone their names or simply, research using "google.com". Try it rather then continuing the disorder of color or racial identification.
 
Moderator's Warning:
ColdDirt, stop goading posters that are not even involved in the thread. Debate the topic.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
Moderator's Warning:
ColdDirt, stop goading posters that are not even involved in the thread. Debate the topic.
Click to expand...

Ok, I was just trying to get some of the liberals here to explain why this is happening when they claim there is no racism in the democrat party.
 
I am a very liberal individual, and although I am not Democrat nor Republican, I think that there are racists in both parties. Anyone who says one party is more racist then the next is an absolute moron.

Now that doesn't mean that one "administration" isn't more racist than another "administration", because quite frankly my opinions on Bush and his administration would probably urk a lot of you.
 
What they should do is induct a token white boy, much like the traditional "all-white-he-man-woman-hater's-club's" do. They need a white Tiger Woods.

To think there are not still, in this day and age, a plethra of exclusive organizations out there that bars whites, blacks, jewish, gentiles, <fill in the group here> is naive.

In our age of political correctness, we are more discreet and civil about it perhaps, but the underlying principles are still there in stone. Of course it's not right. But if you wanna dog out the blacks for doing it, one should make sure their own house is in order first before they start throwing stones. (Something about a plank and a speck come to mind as well but I digress.)

Maybe they should let Eminem join their caucus. He's as black as Tiger is white.


That way, everyone can pretend that we are all just one big happy family and we can all go home and plop on the couch, drink beer and flip through the channels, knowing the world is at harmony and peace.
 
"It's a relatively minor point, and largely a matter of semantics, but, strictly speaking, the Congressional Black Caucus is not racist.

Racism is a belief that one race is inherently superior, genetically, to another, ie that the "other" race is not...quite...fully human.

Bigotry, on the other hand, is simply a dislike for, and a desire to not associate with, another race.

The congressional black caucus is bigoted, not racist."

I dissagree. Could whites do the same thing? so it seems there are different sets of rules for different people.
 
Cold Dirt said:
Ok, I was just trying to get some of the liberals here to explain why this is happening when they claim there is no racism in the democrat party.
Click to expand...

I'll adress your wierd notions of the B.C., they are not a civil rights organisation. Your assumption that they are "2 faced democrats" organisation is as flawed as every other post you've ever written on this forum. They're not civil rights leaders, they werent there with Martin Luther King Jr or Malcom X. They were simply formed to protect the interests of African Americans in the U.S. .They weren't formed to promote equality among "the races". They were formed to advance the interests and voice the issues concerning African Americans and African Americans alone. Not Asian-Americans, not Italian-Americans and not even Hispanic-Americans.

Your assumption that they are a democrat only organisation is troubling too. There have been 3 Republicans elected to congress since the caucus was started. All 3 were asked to join and all 3 refused. Not because they didn't agree with the goals the caucus established for itself but because of simple partisanship. My opinion is they probably chose to be republicanish and not co-operate with democrats for the good of African Americans.

Now I'll adress the current issue at hand. I dont agree with the actions of the Caucus simply because they are doing a disservice to African-Americans. The goal of the caucus is to advance the views of their people; considering the fact that 60% of Stephen Cohen's Constituents are African Americans, their refusal to accept him as one of their own shows that their actions aren't really helping African Americans.

I hope this was helpful to you C.D.
 
Super post, Hatuey.
 
Hatuey said:
I do try but it's hard when 90% of everything posted before I is partisanship.
Click to expand...

I know. That's what I like about your post...didn't smell anything like it. :mrgreen:

Hows it hanging?
Click to expand...

Busy, but cool.
 
CaptainCourtesy said:
I know. That's what I like about your post...didn't smell anything like it. :mrgreen:
Click to expand...

I doubt it'll be replied with anything smarter then " screw off, liberals are bad and they eat babies".

Busy, but cool.
Click to expand...

Good to hear. Exercising them old bones are we?
 

Bingo. :applaud

But what I question is this. Why can't we start an organization and call it the "White Caucus" without being labeled racist? Why doesn't my local community college have a "White Student's Union?" They have a Black Student's Union.

I think just about every group has their own exclusive organizations that cater to their particular interests and is exclusive to their interests and people only. That's just reality. I can't join a soriety. Women can't join a fraternity. For every organization inclusive to blacks only, you will find a hundred white organizations that are inclusive to whites only but for some reason, it is not acceptable for the whites to just come out and say it.

Imagine the reaction. You are walking down the hall and the sign on the door reads, "White Student's Union." Can you even IMAGINE the stink that would cause? Yet, at my local community college, there it is as big as Texas, right there on the door..."Black Student's Union." And for some reason, that is ok.
 
Hatuey said:
They were simply formed to protect the interests of African Americans in the U.S.
Click to expand...

What issues are unique and specific blacks?

They were formed to advance the interests and voice the issues concerning African Americans and African Americans alone.
Click to expand...

And those are specifically what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…