- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 5,729
- Reaction score
- 2,853
- Location
- Colorado mountains
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
No. Your only defense here is to project your own method of non-reasoning onto those who reveal you.Your reasoning is fallacious. It is solely based on a logical fallacy. Argumentum ad ignorantiam to be specific.
No. Your only defense here is to project your own method of non-reasoning onto those who reveal you.
Argument from ignorance is exactly the specific method of indictment you employ against Mr Nye.
Your gonna have to do a lot better than that Mr self proclaimed Genius.
What you can't seem to understand is that I never used my suspicion as an argument against his anti-science nonsense. I merely provided evidence of him faking an experiment.Oh is it? And the ad hom you presented labeling someone a child molester without any proper evidence or trial is not a fallacy? Get that trash out of here.
I provided you a link to the test results. Why don't you go ahead and take the test?Did I really read that right earlier? He was so horrible at presenting his case that he had to start inventing **** about how he has an extraordinarily high IQ and that's why we should all believe him?
Sounds legit.
I provided you a link to the test results. Why don't you go ahead and take the test?
That is a lie. Why are you lying to the forum?Argument from ignorance is exactly the specific method of indictment you employ against Mr Nye.
Your concession is respectfully accepted.Bahahahahahahahahaha. You're getting bitch slapped by an entire thread, so you start challenging people to an online IQ test. How ridiculously pathetic is that.
Your concession is respectfully accepted.
Bull****. You are lying.No, I just took it, and I scored a 275, so I guess I win and that's why all my arguments are right. That really is soooo much easier than actually having to prove a point.
Bull****. You are lying.
Ad hominem.Now you know how we feel. If dozens of people are calling you an idiot and crushing you in a debate, challenging them in an online IQ test just makes you look even more pathetic.
Ad hominem.
Bull****. I never advocated a "young earth creation model" in the first place. Why are you lying to the forum again? Tell the forum which post of mine advocated a "young earth creation" model. Of course you can't do that because you are simply lying.Oh you poor thing. Bill Nye argued against your young earth creation model
Merely pointing out the logical fallacies you keep spewing. Why do you use them so often?Keep it up. It's rebuttals like these that have made it so easy for us to crush you.
Bull****. I never advocated a "young earth creation model" in the first place. Why are you lying to the forum again? Tell the forum which post of mine advocated a "young earth creation" model. Of course you can't do that because you are simply lying.
It seems like all of your posts directed at me are either demonstrable lies or logical fallacies. WTF dude?
Merely pointing out the logical fallacies you keep spewing. Why do you use them so often?
Actually no, I did not. I merely expressed my suspicion. I never accused him of any such thing. Everyone with adequate reading comprehension skills can clearly see that.No, you just accused someone you don't know of being a child rapist,
That is a lie. Why are you lying to the forum?
That was not a lie ... it was an observation.
You know next to nothing about Bill Nye and you indicted him as a suspected child molester on no knowledge or evidence what so ever.
Your argument came straight from ignorance of any facts.
You are merely repeating your lies again.That was not a lie ... it was an observation.
You know next to nothing about Bill Nye and you indicted him as a suspected child molester on no knowledge or evidence what so ever.
Your argument came straight from ignorance of any facts.
This retort amounts to an equivalence of the childish refrain we all heard in grade school; "sure you are, but what am I?"Your concession is respectfully accepted.
Feel free to refrain from your repeated ad hominems and take the test.This retort amounts to an equivalence of the childish refrain we all heard in grade school; "sure you are, but what am I?"
Surely a genius of Muhammed's claimed IQ could respond on a higher intellectual plane than that of a toddler.:lamo
You are merely repeating your lies again.
So what do you think of Bill Nye faking an experiment? You seem to be avoiding that issue. WTF?
There you go lying again. Nothing you said in that post is factual.I have addressed that very issue several times here in this thread. Nye merely narrated the voice over done in pre-production of the video demonstration of well established and accepted science. He did not take part in the video demonstration.
I repeat , I did not lie... I made an accurate observation of your childish straw-man tactics.
You have nothing more than a wild un-founded accusation and an under-educated opinion of the man.
Feel free to refrain from your repeated ad hominems and take the test.
My comments are not ad hominems. An ad hominem would be calling someone a name without accuracy or foundation...as you have done with Mr. NyeFeel free to refrain from your repeated ad hominems and take the test.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?