Human activity mostly. Believe it or not humans cannot live on fossil fuels. They are poisonous and carcinogenic.If that is so then why is the planet overall some 15% greener than it was 40 years ago according to MODIS/CSIRO satellite observational research data ?
Such considerations are moot, since continued warming will bring mass disruption to human civilization which is predicated on current temperatures and sea levels.Plants like co2 levels at least 3 times higher than today for optimum growth as any commercial greenhouse owner will confirm. The current environmental levels actually represent a co2 impoverishment of the biosphere in reality
Plants like co2 levels at least 3 times higher than today for optimum growth as any commercial greenhouse owner will confirm. The current environmental levels actually represent a co2 impoverishment of the biosphere in reality
Are you denying the greenhouse effect on the world?The world is not a greenhouse.
Such considerations are moot, since continued warming will bring mass disruption to human civilization which is predicated on current temperatures and sea levels.
So why is it greening like one ?
There is nothing wrong with current temperatures indeed they are well within the normal natural variation of recent millennia in both their level and rate of change
View attachment 67505726
Its a colder world that would be by far the real threat to our civilization yet alarmists refuse to acknowledge this because you cant bash the West with it
View attachment 67505727
Modern human civilization depends on modern climate conditions--not those of thousands of years ago.There is nothing wrong with current temperatures indeed they are well within the normal natural variation of recent millennia in both their level and rate of change
They aren't good. However, contrary to common belief, it's actually cow belching caused by a process called enteric fermentation that contributes to methane emissions.I've heard cow farts are bad.
Yep.That's what I mean. For example, it's not mentioned that in the past CO2 emissions went up naturally at a rate of 30 ppm per thousand years. Now, it's around 1 ppm per year, or at least 14 times faster.
The problem is that our massive population came into being because of the benefits we get from the high energy densityHuman activity mostly. Believe it or not humans cannot live on fossil fuels. They are poisonous and carcinogenic.
Leafy green areas that have been added to the Earth's surface since 2000 and were catalogued by NASA satellite MODIS appeared because of reforestation as well as agricultural activity. Especially in China and India increased human activity has caused more areas to be covered with plants.
https://www.statista.com/chart/17230/earth-is-greener-than-20-years-ago-2000-2017/#:~:text=Leafy green areas that have,to be covered with plants.
The flatulence that comes out of politicians mouths is worse.I've heard cow farts are bad.
the atmosphere is like one giant greenhouse. that is why they call it the greenhouse effect.The world is not a greenhouse.
What a stupid title.They aren't good. However, contrary to common belief, it's actually cow belching caused by a process called enteric fermentation that contributes to methane emissions.
Which is a bigger methane source: cow belching or cow flatulence? - NASA Science
Contrary to common belief, it’s actually cow belching caused by a process called enteric fermentation that contributes to methane emissions. Enteric fermentation is the digestive process in which sugars are broken down into simpler molecules for absorption into the bloodstream. This process also...science.nasa.gov
I bet you're popular at parties. "Mister Fun" himself.What a stupid title.
Both belching and farts are called flatulence.
Shows how stupid those agenda drive journal majors are controlling that sub-site.
Here's a great explainer:the atmosphere is like one giant greenhouse. that is why they call it the greenhouse effect.
Do you know how greenhouses work?
Batteries do a fine job of replacing gasoline in EV's. There energy density is less but the efficiency of electric motors and energy recovery during braking make a huge difference. Only 25% of the energy in gasoline goes toward moving the vehicle. The rest is wasted as heat.The problem is that our massive population came into being because of the benefits we get from the high energy density
fuels we get from oil. To replace oil, we need something else that can fill the same functions.
Batteries are not going to fill the role.
Batteries do an alight job of replacing small passenger cars for local trips.Batteries do a fine job of replacing gasoline in EV's. There energy density is less but the efficiency of electric motors and energy recovery during braking make a huge difference. Only 25% of the energy in gasoline goes toward moving the vehicle. The rest is wasted as heat.
Tesla Tells Us How It Keeps Beating Nearly Everyone inAug 9, 2020 — Working the numbers, one would expect somewhere around 85.7% charging efficiency.
All told from the generator to the wheel if one started with 1000 watts,Sep 18, 2020 — Tesla told Car and Driver that the motor in the Model S has gone from 80 percent efficient to 90 percent,
The climate chart of Christian Dietrich Schonweiss and a blog from Twitter?There is nothing wrong with current temperatures indeed they are well within the normal natural variation of recent millennia in both their level and rate of change
View attachment 67505726
Its a colder world that would be by far the real threat to our civilization yet alarmists refuse to acknowledge this because you cant bash the West with it
View attachment 67505727
No modern climate conditions are currently excellent for humans and continue improving if one just looks at the precedents over the last century
View attachment 67505858
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?