what do you guys think of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch
i thought that i came up with it, but of course, it is already an established if unlikely theory. the basic premise is that since galaxies are basically circling black holes, eventually there will be enough massive singularities that everything will roll down the spacetime hill and congeal into a singularity with infinite mass. then the big bang happens again. this violates the law of entropy, but you have to take into account that the physical laws of the universe as we know them don't necessarily apply before the big bang. the layman's simple explanation : the universe breathes in and out.
caveat : i'm a biochemist / microbiologist with a limited background in physics, so i can only see this in a broader sense. i can't translate it into mathematics, but it makes sense to me in part because :
it's fascinating to think about, at least.
I an not a physicist either, my science study/interests lie in Biology, anthropology, and some engineering.
However, what this video raises to my mind is that "space" is not just an empty nothingness waiting to be filled by matter, but that it has some characteristic(s) that can be warped by matter.
This supports the multidimensional theory of more dimensions than simple Euclidian space.
I fully subscribe to this theory, and have for quite a while.what do you guys think of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch
i thought that i came up with it, but of course, it is already an established if unlikely theory. the basic premise is that since galaxies are basically circling black holes, eventually there will be enough massive singularities that everything will roll down the spacetime hill and congeal into a singularity with infinite mass. then the big bang happens again. this violates the law of entropy, but you have to take into account that the physical laws of the universe as we know them don't necessarily apply before the big bang. the layman's simple explanation : the universe breathes in and out.
caveat : i'm a biochemist / microbiologist with a limited background in physics, so i can only see this in a broader sense. i can't translate it into mathematics, but it makes sense to me in part because :
<snip>
it's fascinating to think about, at least.
can you give me a little more info on that / an explanation of the terminology?
Yes, Einstein posited this: Gravity warps the space-time continuum. Which is why nothing escapes from behind a black-hole's event horizon, well until a big-bang ostensibly.I an not a physicist either, my science study/interests lie in Biology, anthropology, and some engineering.
However, what this video raises to my mind is that "space" is not just an empty nothingness waiting to be filled by matter, but that it has some characteristic(s) that can be warped by matter.
This supports the multidimensional theory of more dimensions than simple Euclidian space.
what do you guys think of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch
i thought that i came up with it, but of course, it is already an established if unlikely theory. the basic premise is that since galaxies are basically circling black holes, eventually there will be enough massive singularities that everything will roll down the spacetime hill and congeal into a singularity with infinite mass. then the big bang happens again. this violates the law of entropy, but you have to take into account that the physical laws of the universe as we know them don't necessarily apply before the big bang. the layman's simple explanation : the universe breathes in and out.
caveat : i'm a biochemist / microbiologist with a limited background in physics, so i can only see this in a broader sense. i can't translate it into mathematics, but it makes sense to me in part because :
it's fascinating to think about, at least.
It sounds like a rather novel eschatology. Personally I would give more credence to philosophies that weren't just invented last century.
Of course. I mean, why would you want to change things based on newer information?
Headaches are caused by having too much blood and leeches are the best cure.
what do you guys think of this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch
i thought that i came up with it, but of course, it is already an established if unlikely theory. the basic premise is that since galaxies are basically circling black holes, eventually there will be enough massive singularities that everything will roll down the spacetime hill and congeal into a singularity with infinite mass. then the big bang happens again. this violates the law of entropy, but you have to take into account that the physical laws of the universe as we know them don't necessarily apply before the big bang. the layman's simple explanation : the universe breathes in and out.
caveat : i'm a biochemist / microbiologist with a limited background in physics, so i can only see this in a broader sense. i can't translate it into mathematics, but it makes sense to me in part because :
it's fascinating to think about, at least.
black holes won't ever suck up everything there's a limit to how much pull they have just like any other body at least from a distance and most galaxies are moving away from 1 another dark energy seems to be increasing the rate of expansion to
i have herd a the idea that maybe black holes give birth to ther own universes but i dont thick its backed up by anything not that i know anything about physics
intertesting article. i asked my dad what he thought about the whole thing today when we went to play golf. he's a mathematician, and he is self educated in physics. while my theory is that our universe is something like a bubble, he thinks of it more as a band that circles back on itself. i might not be getting that completely right, because i'm having trouble wrapping my mind around it. also, right now i'm too absorbed in my "everything expands, precipitates, and then contracts back into a particle that is orders of magnitude less than the size of an atom with infinite mass before becoming another big bang" breathing universe theory. it just makes so much sense to me that i can't see around it. as a scientist, i need to consider all of the possibilities, not just the possibility that seems like it has to be true.
But how does this violate the 2nd Law?
yeah, i definitely like my theory better than infinitely expanding cold dead corpse universe theory.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?