• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Best US President

Who Was the Best US President?

  • Abraham Lincoln

    Votes: 15 19.0%
  • Franklin Roosevelt

    Votes: 20 25.3%
  • George Washington

    Votes: 9 11.4%
  • Thomas Jefferson

    Votes: 5 6.3%
  • Theodore Roosevelt

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Woodrow Wilson

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Andrew Jackson

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • Harry Truman

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lyndon Johnson

    Votes: 1 1.3%
  • Other (please list below)

    Votes: 22 27.8%

  • Total voters
    79
So, if a crappy Prez pisses off so many people that someone shoots him; he is then instantly a good Prez?

if so, then James Garfield is destined for Mt Rushmore.
 
Isn't it strange that the President who founded the Democratic Party was a genocidal murderer of indigenous people and the President who was responsible for freeing the slaves was a Republican?

Lincoln was the ultimate RINO....
 
He helped move the nation Westward. Simple as that. It was common belief then that the Indians were savages and were slowing our expansion.

Is that what you learned watching westerns as a young man or is that what your schools history books taught you. Well I hate to be the one to tell you this but it didn't happen the way your grade school teacher told you it did. And John Wayne was not a heroic Indian fighter he was a Hollywood actor. It was genocide, murder, extermination. It was ugly, it was passing out blanketts infected with small pox because you knew the natives didn't have the imune defenses to fight it. It was poisening the red man with alcohol, it was signing treaty after treaty that you did not intend to keep to steal the land from them. It was massecre of millions including the women and children, it was the Sand Creek Massacre where the Sothern Cheyennes were attacked and murdered in their peaceful winter camp. It was the massacre at Wounded Knee South Dakota. It was wrong and your history books are wrong. We should all learn the truth about this dark time in our history.
 
Last edited:

It was Westward expansion. Sure, it was ugly, but it was a part of our expansion.

Jackson treated the Indian nations as one, as opposed to his predecessors - which treated them as separate nations. The Senate and House both passed the Indian Removal Act. The Act didn't allow forced removal but allowed the President to negotiate treaties with the Indians.

Given the conflict in Georgia and the attitude of the people at the time, Jackson acted in how the people wanted it - thus, a man for the people.
 
Lincoln was the ultimate RINO....

:lamo


Agreed, the Hitler reference was actually relevant in this case. However, even though I agree that Jackson's policies towards the Indians were horrible, I think it's a stretch to call it genocide. He committed terrible acts of ethnic cleansing and didn't care who was killed. But his main intent was to move the Indians to the West, not kill all of them. So his policies weren't as clear-cut genocide as, say, Hitler's were, where his intention was obviously to kill all the Jews, Roma, etc. That said, calling it genocide is not unreasonable, and it could certainly be argued that his actions constituted genocide.
 
For once I actually agree with SgtRock.

As do I, although I don't think anything Zgoldsmith said is technically wrong. It did allow for western expansion and I believe it was popular with the people at the time, although it was definitely beyond cruel and not too much of a stretch to label genocide. I didn't see Z actually come out and endorse it specifically though.
 

Yes because we all know for certain what the founders wanted in FDR's time and in our current situation. You do realize that not all of the founding fathers werent modern day "libertarians".
 
President Lincoln by far. Our country would not be as free without him.

I agree and voted Lincoln. He saw our nation through the most challenging period in our history. He saved the Union and freed the slaves. And yes, I know the Civil War was not just about slavery. I am also a fan of his leadership style in that he surrounded himself with people who often disagreed with him. Too many leaders surround themselves with "yes men".

There are a few great Presidents in the poll.
 
This was interesting I thought.

"The Murray-Blessing 1982 survey[21] asked historians whether they were liberal or conservative on domestic, social and economic issues."

There was actually very little difference in the top 3 picks as the best presidents by both the conservative and liberal historians.

The liberal historians picked as their top 3,

#1 Lincoln
#2 FDR
#3 Washington

The conservative historians picked as their top 3

#1 Lincoln
#2 Washington
#3 FDR

Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

And if FDR was a president today he would be a socialist communist marxist fascist.....
I think the vast majority of conservatives dont see that FDR was actually a lot more left than Obama...
 
And if FDR was a president today he would be a socialist communist marxist fascist.....
I think the vast majority of conservatives dont see that FDR was actually a lot more left than Obama...

Yes, the survey shows us how just how far conservatives have moved to the right since 1982.
 
Ronald Reagan
I would agree that he is the best in our lifetime, but hardly the best ever. There is much I like about Reagan, and little that I dislike. However, had Reagan had been tasked with a difficult period of time, rather than one of the easier ones, I do not believe his macro management style would have been suited well for such a critical period of time.
 
Andrew Jackson, without a doubt. George Washington being a close second.
 
FDR

no doubt about it.

He turned back the worst domestic threat and the worst foreign threat of the last 100 plus years.

I think this is the least surprised by a poster that I have ever been.:donkeyfla <------haymarket
 
Yep...what a guy.

He had FAR more slaves then any other Founding Father and treated many of them poorly if they did not do as he wished.

And he stole from natives during his military days.


The guy was a dick head.

Yeah, you're right, we should just ignore Valley Forge and all of his great accomplishments. :roll:
 
There's grounds to criticize them, of course, but Washington, Jefferson, Madison are mostly praiseworthy.

There's other folks worthy of honorable mention, too. For example, the more I read about him, the more I like Grover Cleveland.
 
Last edited:

I rank him mid pack, due to his work with the central bank and national debt.

However I agree, he should not be near the top.
 
ı havent much knowledge about him ,but many claim he was a sane president ,who assasinates a bad president?

Yes, he was a good man for the job. It is just so unfortunate that we didn't get to see what he really could have done.
 

Bottom line: We won both. That is success. Couldashouldawoulda is not history.
 
Ronald Reagan

I understand your point, but consider this: Did presidents in the 1700's and 1800's have to deal with nuclear weapons and cyber warfare? They never had to worry about their decisions possibly causing the extinction of man. Also, with the lack of communications and media scrutiny back then, its alost hard to tell WHAT kind of guys they REALLY were.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…