Trans in womens sports is abuse of biological women. Government financing trans surgery is an abuse of taxpayer dollars. Expecting people to accept pushing transgender surgery for children is abuse of children.Its video of Rep. Becca Balint in action https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...b92409a820848e2b31ed99e04ec0d8a&ei=24#details
Its Pride Month, and this is what we should be doing with it.
Abuse is keeping a brain dead woman alive until she gives birth against her family's wishes.Trans in womens sports is abuse of biological women. Government financing trans surgery is an abuse of taxpayer dollars. Expecting people to accept pushing transgender surgery for children is abuse of children.
If you want to pretend you are a women, or man when you are not, that's all on you. Asking the rest of us to play the game with you is ridiculous. You can do as you please with your body, but don't ask us to see it as normal or to pay for it.
The best bang for the federal govt buck, is a policy that provides for people and their doctors to decide their own medical care. Funding abortion via Medicaid services is an incredible investment for govt bean-counters just like you. Its last medicaid dollar you will ever spend on that 'potential life', Now take all those dollars and fund Transcare. You will have plenty left over to transfer over for ICE raidsTrans in womens sports is abuse of biological women. Government financing trans surgery is an abuse of taxpayer dollars. Expecting people to accept pushing transgender surgery for children is abuse of children.
If you want to pretend you are a women, or man when you are not, that's all on you. Asking the rest of us to play the game with you is ridiculous. You can do as you please with your body, but don't ask us to see it as normal or to pay for it.
Protect women's athletics!
Damn! That's a true REPRESENTATIVE.Its video of Rep. Becca Balint in action https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...b92409a820848e2b31ed99e04ec0d8a&ei=24#details
Its Pride Month, and this is what we should be doing with it.
This is whataboutismAbuse is keeping a brain dead woman alive until she gives birth against her family's wishes.
Abuse is making miscarriage a criminal act.
Abuse is making a 9yr old rape victim carry a child.
Abuse is a doctor/hospital turning away a woman in the midst of a miscarriage because they're afraid of being sued.
What?If you are concerned about abuse of biological women, then I assume you're focusing some of your energy toward ending the horrific abuse they endure because they have uteri.
Unless they are forced to breed you don't really have a point.It should be painfully obvious to you that they cannot do as they please with their bodies due to repressive government policies taking away their agency.
Its video of Rep. Becca Balint in action https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...b92409a820848e2b31ed99e04ec0d8a&ei=24#details
Its Pride Month, and this is what we should be doing with it.
They are referring to making decisions about reproduction including termination of the pregnancy.Unless they are forced to breed you don't really have a point.
Unless you're forced to get pregnant in the first place none of this is forced.They are referring to making decisions about reproduction including termination of the pregnancy.
This is a whataboutism and an appeal to emotion fallacy.Abuse is keeping a brain dead woman alive until she gives birth against her family's wishes.
Abuse is making miscarriage a criminal act.
Abuse is making a 9yr old rape victim carry a child.
Abuse is a doctor/hospital turning away a woman in the midst of a miscarriage because they're afraid of being sued.
If you are concerned about abuse of biological women, then I assume you're focusing some of your energy toward ending the horrific abuse they endure because they have uteri. It should be painfully obvious to you that they cannot do as they please with their bodies due to repressive government policies taking away their agency.
Exactly, Democrats can't argue without committing logical fallacies.This is whataboutism
How is abortion "reproduction" if you are killing the baby?They are referring to making decisions about reproduction including termination of the pregnancy.
What's wrong with that?She's right. When it comes to sexuality, Republicans are the regulatory party. They want laws that controls everyone's sexual behavior and identity.
When you're talking about experimenting on children yeah that should be illegal. Sexual behavior with regards to children interacting with adults is unacceptable.She's right. When it comes to sexuality, Republicans are the regulatory party. They want laws that controls everyone's sexual behavior and identity.
The emotional fallacy was claiming that biological women athletes are being abused because they sometimes lose to trans women. Contrast losing a race to the things I listed which are occurring with greater frequency and actual harm or loss of life and try to tell me that losing a race is abuse.This is a whataboutism and an appeal to emotion fallacy.
Makes are excluded from female sports it doesn't matter how they identify.The emotional fallacy was claiming that biological women athletes are being abused because they sometimes lose to trans women.
That's whataboutism. It's not an argument. Two different things at the same time can be abuse what baby a greater form of abuse but when it's not in the scope of discussion you're trying to present a red hairy to deflect from not having a good reason.Contrast losing a race to the things I listed which are occurring with greater frequency and actual harm or loss of life and try to tell me that losing a race is abuse.
Terminating the pregnancy is certainly a reproductive decision. A 20 week fetus isn't a baby, despite your emotional strawman.How is abortion "reproduction" if you are killing the baby?
When does it become a baby then?Terminating the pregnancy is certainly a reproductive decision. A 20 week fetus isn't a baby, despite your emotional strawman.
If you are really a libertarian, instead of being a fascist, why do you think you get a voice in the medical decisions of anyone but yourself?
When it is born and living independently of the mothers body is the legal and medical definition.When does it become a baby then?
That's actually not to legal or medical definition. And some jurisdictions if someone kills a pregnant mother that's a double homicide.When it is born and living independently of the mothers body is the legal and medical definition.
A baby becomes a human being with rights when it is separate from the mothers body. At this point the baby is seen by a prediatcian instead of the mother being treated by an obstetrician.That's actually not to legal or medical definition.
And some jurisdictions if someone kills a pregnant mother that's a double homicide.
You are wrong again. Merriman-Webster.And there's no medical evidence that says all that time of pregnancy where the baby is developing it's not really a baby it's a toaster or a giraffe or something else.
In humans, the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after conception to the moment of birth, as distinguished from the earlier embryo.
Medically illiterate.A baby becomes a human being with rights when it is separate from the mothers body.
Lol see aboveAt this point the baby is seen by a prediatcian instead of the mother being treated by an obstetrician.
Up to a certain point depending on jurisdictionThis is because only the mother has the right to terminate the pregnancy.
if anyone else does it then it is classified as murder.
So how are you able to know what I'm talking about when I say a baby developing I'm the womb?You are wrong again. Merriman-Webster.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?