earthworm
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2005
- Messages
- 5,728
- Reaction score
- 904
- Location
- Goldsboro,PA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Agreed. "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness" seem a higher priority.
Do you have the right to with you body as you see fit or not? Answer the question hay.
NO. You do not.
Now its your turn - is this self ownership in the Constitution?
Oh..so basically what you're saying is that that when you're created you don't have the right to do with your life whatever you want. So the American dream that you believe in is actually a farce. Its a bit funny watching you not realize the connections of things.
It means exactly what is says. Which word don't you understand?When they left an area? What does that mean? You seem to not be aware that you either take claim to property or you don't.
NO. You do not.
Now its your turn - is this self ownership in the Constitution?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
I gave you a straight and no nonsense answer to your question. Are you going to answer mine?
What do you think those rights are based on?
No doubt consulting cloud storage or maybe even simply LAN storage instead of the Internet. I doubt the common Joe would know the difference and no doubt you are scrambling even now to find out what those terms mean.Many younger doctors will use the Internet regularly when they see a patient. Ask people that go to the doctor all the time and they will testify to this.
It means exactly what is says. Which word don't you understand?
Does a pregnant woman have these bodily rights you seem to believe in so much? No??? LOL! So much for rights.Do you have the right to with you body as you see fit or not? Answer the question hay.
No doubt consulting cloud storage or maybe even simply LAN storage instead of the Internet. I doubt the common Joe would know the difference and no doubt you are scrambling even now to find out what those terms mean.
Does a pregnant woman have these bodily rights you seem to believe in so much? No??? LOL! So much for rights.
LOL! And why is that? What exactly makes them different?How in the hell is that comparable? The first is the same transaction and the later is creating a new transaction.
A right only exists if you have it to exercise. If your government does not recognize what you claim is a right - then you simply do not have it and it does not exist for you.
That is called reality.
Nothing I say or do changes that reality. Nothing I believe or do not believe changes that reality.
LOL! And why is that? What exactly makes them different?
So you ignored the other half of the post. Then let's try again.Well what I get out of it is if they left the land they have no interest in the land any further renouncing their claims. In the context given that appears to be accurate, but I'm assuming you meant something else.
So you ignored the other half of the post. Then let's try again.
What do YOU think "... ancient tribes "owned" the land only in so far as they stopped other tribes from using it" means???
Then let the owner produce whatever he wants without labor.I already went over it. The labor is a separate transaction from what you are attaching it too. I also went over the reasons why the property goes to owner and why the labor is merely assistance and treated as such.
No, you accused me of back-tracking (or contradicting myself), which I did not do. Obviously you interpreted that phrase to mean something specific so I'd like to know what it was. I can't fix it if I don't know what's wrong. So, once again:I'm more looking for you to answer that since I asked you the question first.
That is because you lack any form for logic, and to compensate for your lack of understanding you decide to act like an immature jerk.I have no idea what you are talking about.
That is because you lack any form for logic, and to compensate for your lack of understanding you decide to act like an immature jerk.
You seem to be completely incapable of understanding the difference between.
1. To show what the average household income is in RTW states and non-RTW states. (adjusted for costs)
2. To evaluate if RTW states or non-RTW states are better.
When I say my aim and the aim of this random professor are not the same. I mean, my aim is 1. His aim is 2. To evaluate number 1, you only need to find income adjusted for living costs. For evaluating number 2, you need to evaluate multiple factors, and he fails because he correlates for factors like unemployment and the age of the state.
Also, again. I see no response to the holes I pointed out in his research, and this is the fourth time. Why should I trust his research if you are incapable of defending it? The only argument you seem capable of expressing is the failed argument above, and appeal to authority. Except no one here apart from you know who he is.
The liberals on this board just don't get it. We need to look at the places with the strongest economies and adopt their labor laws.
Which nation has had unbelievable economic growth the last ten years? That would be China.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?