• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barr; Mueller Report will be delivered by mid-April

hanger4

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
7,501
Reaction score
1,504
Location
WNC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
*"Everyone will soon be able to read it on their own,” Mr. Barr wrote in a letter to the chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary committees.

Mr. Barr told the lawmakers the Justice Department is marking progress on redacting the nearly 400-page report, noting that Mr. Mueller is assisting with the process.

In the letter, Mr. Barr said he will not hand over the report to the White House for a privilege review prior to delivering the report to Congress.


“Although the president would have the right to assert privilege over certain parts of the report, he has stated publicly that he intends to defer to me and, accordingly, there are no plans to submit the report to the White House for a privilege review,” he wrote.*

William Barr says the Mueller report will be delivered to Congress by mid-April - Washington Times

400 pages, Mid-April, Mueller assisting, WH get the report same time as Congress.
 

Three looming questions:

1: will Congress get the complete report to read that is unreacted by Barr?
2: the many areas of possible redactions listed by Barr in his Friday letter will hit the complete report just how hard?
3: will the public redactions be seen as black lines or will the report simply skip over that redacted material?

The answer to those two questions determine the integrity of this process.
 

Sounds like a good deal to me, but that's not what the Trump haters want.
 

If you don't believe Barr is accurately portraying the report, just bring Mueller before congress and ask him directly. Much better result than having the talking heads from both sides cherry-picking a phrase to make a point.

My guess is that close to 0% of the American public will read the 300-400 pages in the report. Though I am sure a relatively few political operatives such as yourself might.
 

Can you answer the three questions about the report?

1: will Congress get the complete report to read that is unreacted by Barr?
2: the many areas of possible redactions listed by Barr in his Friday letter will hit the complete report just how hard?
3: will the public redactions be seen as black lines or will the report simply skip over that redacted material?

You pretended to reply but actually did not answer the questions.
 

1) No, the answer was in the link.

2) You won't know till release. Considering this a counter intelligence investigation I'd imagine quite a bit will be redacted.

3) I've never seen anything but black line redactions, have you ??

*You pretended to reply but actually did not answer the questions.*

Ya gots to admit ^^^^ haymarket this is funny ironic. :thumbs:
 

The possibility exists of a report issued in edited and abridged from where we do not see the reactions or see that they have been made simply because that material is missing.

And the Congress is a co-equal branch of government and has a right top see the full report.
 

All I've ever seen or heard about are black line redactions, have you seen or heard of anything but ??

I'd imagine those with a need to know would have access to the parts needed.
 
Sounds like a good deal to me, but that's not what the Trump haters want.

Of course it isn't. But then the Trump haters don't care about America or national security or protecting innocent people. All they want is something they can use, however dishonestly, to attack the President with.

To protect the integrity of grand jury proceedings, it is critical that information that must be kept secret in order to do that be redacted. To not compromise national security, it is important that sensitive classified material be redacted. And it is unconscionable that hateful people would want innocent people's names made public and subject to intense media scrutiny, conspiracy theories, with the resulting hate campaigns that will be initiated on social media and on message boards like this including death threats that ALL people named in the Russian investigation have received.

It seems that there is no limit to the intellectual dishonesty and willingness to hurt or destroy people by those consumed by resentment, bitterness, disappointment, and hate. Fairness, justice, integrity, compassion simply don't factor into that equation.
 
All I've ever seen or heard about are black line redactions, have you seen or heard of anything but ??

I'd imagine those with a need to know would have access to the parts needed.

I hope you are right. We need to see where redactions were made and the amount being covered up by Barr.
 
All I've ever seen or heard about are black line redactions, have you seen or heard of anything but ??

I'd imagine those with a need to know would have access to the parts needed.

Yes, those with the proper security clearances in both parties should see the unredacted report so that they can report that the redactions were proper and that they did not change the impressions of the special counsel's findings in any way. But grand jury process and national security should not be compromised to satisfy some angry people's curiosity, and innocent people should not be named and therefore be subjected to endless media investigation, all manner of conspiracy theories, vicious attacks on social media, and the death threats everybody else has had to put up with.
 

Well, you don't really need to read the whole thing. Just the parts that people disagree on. So you can bet that I will be reading the parts that, for example, Fox News and MSNBC have different interpretations of. Everyone who has ever taken too many credits at once in college knows the tricks to mining the pertinent information.
 
I hope you are right. We need to see where redactions were made and the amount being covered up by Barr.

Covered up by Barr, Rosenstein and Mueller.

You need to get you conspiracy theories straight.
 

:thumbs:
 
Covered up by Barr, Rosenstein and Mueller.

You need to get you conspiracy theories straight.

Mueller turned in over 400 pages. Less than 100 of his words were cherry picked by Barr and released.
 
Mueller turned in over 400 pages. Less than 100 of his words were cherry picked by Barr and released.

And all 400 pages are being reviewed for national security, grand jury and unindicted names redactions by Barr, Rosenstein and Mueller.

I find it amusing that you actually believe there's something in the full report that allays the Mueller quote concerning the Trump Campaign Russian conspiracy.
 
Mueller turned in over 400 pages. Less than 100 of his words were cherry picked by Barr and released.

BTW, as you know there was one main objective and it's companion, the Trump Campaign Russian conspiracy and Obstruction of justice. How many words do you think it takes to say, yea, nay or let the DOJ decide. :roll:
 
BTW, as you know there was one main objective and it's companion, the Trump Campaign Russian conspiracy and Obstruction of justice. How many words do you think it takes to say, yea, nay or let the DOJ decide. :roll:

Apparently it takes as many as to fill over 400 pages.
 
Do you after laugh at dry facts?

I laugh at silly statements. You obviously know the voluminous report is an explanation as to how the conclusions were reached. You obviously know, nothing in those 400 pages will change the conclusions.
 
What is the justification for not sending the full report to Congress? It is Congress’ Constitutional duty to oversee the Executive Branch. Unless Barr is attempting to hide something there’s no reason our duely elected representatives should not se the full report.
 
I laugh at silly statements. You obviously know the voluminous report is an explanation as to how the conclusions were reached. You obviously know, nothing in those 400 pages will change the conclusions.

Patience is a virtue. Show some.
 

With any luck, he'll do what the Obama administration did and unmask hundreds of citizens for no other reason than sport as was the practice under the idiocy of the watchful eye of Samantha Powers. This was sarcasm.

The redactions will be done to protect and preserve methods and practices and the innocent.

The Democrats will continue the lies and deceptions to mislead the weak minded.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…