- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,303
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
lovely. Well he gives away his salary, but he gets the DOJ as his personal legal team for free.
lol
U.S. Justice Department Is Looking To Take Over Trump's Defense In Assault Lawsuit Against Him
That's right, the DOJ is now going to defend Trump in a civil defamation case. There is no way that the government should be using tax payers money to defend Trump in a personal case brought against him by another American citizen. Trump brought this case upon himself by his actions and he must pay for his own attorneys. I can not conceive if anyone thinking that this is the right thing for the DOJ to be doing. Even the most ardent Trump follower and especially every real conservatives all ought to be saying hell no. I suspect that will not be the case, but this just shows that those who have been saying that Barr is acting not like the AG, but Trump's personal attorney are correct.
Where the Trump supporters to defend this action?
No such precedent exists. This post is a lie.It's well established precedent that federal elected officials can't be sued for defamation. Ms. Carroll should be fined for filing a frivolous lawsuit.
So, is Political Tribune an offshoot of The Atlantic?U.S. Justice Department Is Looking To Take Over Trump's Defense In Assault Lawsuit Against Him
That's right, the DOJ is now going to defend Trump in a civil defamation case. There is no way that the government should be using tax payers money to defend Trump in a personal case brought against him by another American citizen. Trump brought this case upon himself by his actions and he must pay for his own attorneys. I can not conceive if anyone thinking that this is the right thing for the DOJ to be doing. Even the most ardent Trump follower and especially every real conservatives all ought to be saying hell no. I suspect that will not be the case, but this just shows that those who have been saying that Barr is acting not like the AG, but Trump's personal attorney are correct.
No such precedent exists. This post is a lie.
So, is Political Tribune an offshoot of The Atlantic?
No such precedent exists. This post is a lie.
You appear to have missed the "official acts" part of the law.Oh look, the "lawyer" doesn't know what the Westfall Act is.
Why It is Pointless to Sue a Member of Congress for Defamation | Point of Order
Oh look, the "lawyer" doesn't know what the Westfall Act is.
Why It is Pointless to Sue a Member of Congress for Defamation | Point of Order
You appear to have missed the "official acts" part of the law.
No, I read the article.Oh look, you didn't read the article. How surprising.
It's well established precedent that federal elected officials can't be sued for defamation. Ms. Carroll should be fined for filing a frivolous lawsuit.
It's well established precedent that federal elected officials can't be sued for defamation. Ms. Carroll should be fined for filing a frivolous lawsuit.
His “charitable” act is a slap in the face of Americans. Just one of his weekend trips to his own clubs in FL or NJ costs the American people millions of dollars more, and as an added bonus for Trump, he directly profits from those weekends.lovely. Well he gives away his salary, but he gets the DOJ as his personal legal team for free.
lol
Barr made his position clear from the beginning.U.S. Justice Department Is Looking To Take Over Trump's Defense In Assault Lawsuit Against Him
That's right, the DOJ is now going to defend Trump in a civil defamation case. There is no way that the government should be using tax payers money to defend Trump in a personal case brought against him by another American citizen. Trump brought this case upon himself by his actions and he must pay for his own attorneys. I can not conceive if anyone thinking that this is the right thing for the DOJ to be doing. Even the most ardent Trump follower and especially every real conservatives all ought to be saying hell no. I suspect that will not be the case, but this just shows that those who have been saying that Barr is acting not like the AG, but Trump's personal attorney are correct.
Only if they are acting in their official capacity. THis was a personal issue not related to Trump's official capacity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?