• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Axios retroactively edits out any mention of Kamala as border czar, even though it reported that she was in 2021 (1 Viewer)

PoS

Minister of Love
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 24, 2014
Messages
38,591
Reaction score
31,311
Location
Oceania
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian


And here is proof Kamala was indeed appointed as border czar, by none other than Sleepy Joe himself:



The gaslighting is real. The MSM covered up for Biden's dementia, now theyre trying to cover up Kamala's incompetence. Now sit back and relax as the lib cultists engage in one fallacy after another, from ad homs to shoot the messenger in an effort to gaslight some more. ;)
 


And here is proof Kamala was indeed appointed as border czar, by none other than Sleepy Joe himself:



The gaslighting is real. The MSM covered up for Biden's dementia, now theyre trying to cover up Kamala's incompetence. Now sit back and relax as the lib cultists engage in one fallacy after another, from ad homs to shoot the messenger in an effort to gaslight some more. ;)

Biden never actually calls her a "border czar" in that video, or anywhere else. That's something the media made up.
 
Of course, Axios wasn't the only one. Many outlets referred to her that way at the time...


Announcing Ms Harris's appointment as his immigration czar, Mr Biden told reporters and officials at the White House: "She's the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".
 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
Of course, Axios wasn't the only one. Many outlets referred to her that way at the time...


Announcing Ms Harris's appointment as his immigration czar, Mr Biden told reporters and officials at the White House: "She's the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".
Yes, it was a media and Republican created title. Don't know which came first.
 
Of course, Axios wasn't the only one. Many outlets referred to her that way at the time...


Announcing Ms Harris's appointment as his immigration czar, Mr Biden told reporters and officials at the White House: "She's the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle [Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador], and the countries that are going to need help in stemming the movement of so many folks - stemming the migration to our southern border".
Notably, at no point did Biden himself ever refer to VP Harris by the title of "immigration czar", nor did he ever put her in charge of border security.
 
Yes, it was a media and Republican created title. Don't know which came first.
Yes, similar to how the media and Democrats made up the "insurrection" label. Why aren't they out correcting the record on that?
 
Yes, similar to how the media and Democrats made up the "insurrection" label. Why aren't they out correcting the record on that?
I don't correct every thing that is said. Do you? But if you must know, here I am:

I actually don't support calling J6 an insurrection. You can find several posts of me saying as much. But I will say there is much more grounding for calling it such than you would ever have in pretending Biden is "providing aid or comfort" to enemies because of his border policies.

As much as I don't want Trump as 47, I don't think disqualifying him using the 14A is the way to go. Not yet anyway. I really don't think we have the sufficient evidence to say Trump was involved in an insurrection. If we get evidence he was directly involved with any of the groups where members were found guilty of seditious conspiracy, then we're onto something. But "fight like hell" really isn't enough, nor is sitting on his hands (with a loaded diaper) while the rioters had their way.

If SCOTUS rules he was part of an insurrection and should be disqualified, OK. But it's not going to happen. We either have to redeem ourselves and vote against him (yes, against, yet again) or accept our country is run by fools and allow him one last term.

Doing the "right thing" is not always doing what you believe to be right.

SCOTUS has many ways to rule against CO and Maine's decision. And to be honest, very few to rule with them. While it is true that you don't have to be convicted to be disqualified by the 14A, in this case, it would really help immensely. Insurrection is very specific. I've said all along that I don't agree that the riots on J6 were an insurrection. Only two people (that I know of) were even convicted of anything remotely similar with charges of seditious conspiracy. To date, there has been no publicly available evidence to tie Trump to those two individuals. Without this, I don't think anyone can say, legally, that Trump was involved in an insurrection.
 
Biden never actually calls her a "border czar" in that video, or anywhere else. That's something the media made up.

Yeah, I listened to it twice because I thought I may have missed it.
 
Yes, it's what we term a "failure."
HA! You don't even know enough about what she was doing to judge her! But that's not unusual for knee-jerk Trump defenders. They are notorious for having very strong opinions about things they know nothing about. In fact, the more ignorant they are on any subject, the stronger their opinions seem to be.
 
Having a more objective media for the past month was certainly exciting while it lasted, but the wagons are quickly circling once again.
The media wasn't 'more objective' for the past month.
The Democrat elites had decided to throw Biden under the bus, given their and their media's exposure for lying about Biden's condition since 10/21.
The media was simply following their master's orders.

How the Bet on an 81-Year-Old Joe Biden Turned Into an Epic MiscalculationHow the Bet on an 81-Year-Old Joe Biden Turned Into an Epic Miscalculation​

 
  • Like
Reactions: PoS
The media wasn't 'more objective' for the past month.
The Democrat elites had decided to throw Biden under the bus, given their and their media's exposure for lying about Biden's condition since 10/21.
The media was simply following their master's orders.

How the Bet on an 81-Year-Old Joe Biden Turned Into an Epic MiscalculationHow the Bet on an 81-Year-Old Joe Biden Turned Into an Epic Miscalculation​

I am just trying to anticipate how the right will spin the MSM reporting Harris' election win in November. It's like anticipating the next Nancy Drew fiction novel- always leaves you amazed at the unexpected twists and turns and imaginativeness! Too bad I don't have as much time for reading fiction as I used to.
 
Regardless what you call it, Kamala treated it like a joke.

Other than a photo op trip to Guatemala to quell the chorus of people asking what she was doing about it, she blew the assignment off entirely.

And she never even got to go to Europe either! :ROFLMAO:
 


And here is proof Kamala was indeed appointed as border czar, by none other than Sleepy Joe himself:



The gaslighting is real. The MSM covered up for Biden's dementia, now theyre trying to cover up Kamala's incompetence. Now sit back and relax as the lib cultists engage in one fallacy after another, from ad homs to shoot the messenger in an effort to gaslight some more. ;)

What's the diff??

The GOP, on command of Trump, shut off the bipartisan border bill to improve the issue------------end of story.

Quit acting like the GOP give a crap
 
Yeah, blame Axios, they incorrectly picked that moniker up and you righties ran with it. Find another reason to pick on her.

WASHINGTON (TND) — Reporting by Axios on Wednesday said Vice President Kamala Harris “never actually had” the title of border czar, a claim which contradicts its own reporting on the topic.

The outlet on Wednesday described “confusion” about Harris’s role in the Biden White House, citing “early media misfires” about her position as border czar. Such reporting, it said, “has made the issue a top target for the GOP trying to define their new opponent.”

Axios in 2021, however, reported Harris was “appointed by Biden as border czar.” It acknowledged this in an editor’s note in its Wednesday article.

“This article has been updated and clarified to note that Axios was among the news outlets that incorrectly labeled Harris a ‘border czar’ back in 2021,” it wrote.

 
Yeah, blame Axios, they incorrectly picked that moniker up and you righties ran with it. Find another reason to pick on her.

WASHINGTON (TND) — Reporting by Axios on Wednesday said Vice President Kamala Harris “never actually had” the title of border czar, a claim which contradicts its own reporting on the topic.

The outlet on Wednesday described “confusion” about Harris’s role in the Biden White House, citing “early media misfires” about her position as border czar. Such reporting, it said, “has made the issue a top target for the GOP trying to define their new opponent.”

Axios in 2021, however, reported Harris was “appointed by Biden as border czar.” It acknowledged this in an editor’s note in its Wednesday article.

“This article has been updated and clarified to note that Axios was among the news outlets that incorrectly labeled Harris a ‘border czar’ back in 2021,” it wrote.

If only those facts would put an end to it - but the right-wing-nuts will continue to run on the "border czar" lie, just like every other zombie lie that they refuse to let die. And that list seems to grow almost daily. One might have hoped that we've come a long way since Obama's birth certificate, Trump's stolen election, Joe Biden's corruption, et al ad nauseam, but these, and dozens of other even older ones are still echoing in their airless grottoes, just as the GOP slime cranks out new zombie lies quicker than old ones can ever fade away. American politics has become "World War Z."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom