• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Attorney General Pam Bondi has made quite the First Amendment-related faux pas: In a recent interview about what the federal government could do to de

ColdHardTruth

SN/YN US NAVY
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
Messages
28,215
Reaction score
25,177
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Attorney General Pam Bondi has made quite the First Amendment-related faux pas: In a recent interview about what the federal government could do to deter political violence in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, she said the government would “go after” anyone engaged in hate speech.

Hate speech, on its own, is simply not a separate category of unprotected speech, from the standpoint of the Supreme Court. In a separate interview, Bondi also suggested that employers had an obligation to fire employees for engaging in hate speech or for actions such as refusing to print pro-Kirk posters at Office Depot. Let’s watch.

The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh called her opinion “insane” and said that President Trump should fire her. Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas) similarly clarified that the First Amendment absolutely protects hate speech, while noting that individuals could still suffer professional consequences for saying cruel things about Kirk. <--- That moment when Ted Cruz says something accurate.

This is not only wrong, but also unconstitutional.

Bondi is a blithering moron from one of the dumbest states in the union. She needs to be fired, disbarred and deported to Flor-I-Duh and told she is not allowed out of that state for any reason.

 
Attorney General Pam Bondi has made quite the First Amendment-related faux pas: In a recent interview about what the federal government could do to deter political violence in the wake of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, she said the government would “go after” anyone engaged in hate speech.

Hate speech, on its own, is simply not a separate category of unprotected speech, from the standpoint of the Supreme Court. In a separate interview, Bondi also suggested that employers had an obligation to fire employees for engaging in hate speech or for actions such as refusing to print pro-Kirk posters at Office Depot. Let’s watch.

The Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh called her opinion “insane” and said that President Trump should fire her. Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas) similarly clarified that the First Amendment absolutely protects hate speech, while noting that individuals could still suffer professional consequences for saying cruel things about Kirk. <--- That moment when Ted Cruz says something accurate.

This is not only wrong, but also unconstitutional.

Bondi is a blithering moron from one of the dumbest states in the union. She needs to be fired, disbarred and deported to Flor-I-Duh and told she is not allowed out of that state for any reason.

Yeah Pam bomdi messed up here. The thing I don't understand is why the left has a problem that they've been crowing about hate speech for almost two decades. There's no such thing as hate speech it's just free speech.
 
The whole lot in this administration are poster children for faux pas.
 
Back
Top Bottom