Atheism isnt blasphemous because people are allowed to have their own thoughts. Shaming people for other thoughts is a tribal defense. But Satanism is blasphemous because its done ONLY for the sake of making other people not have fun. I think god is strong enough to let people be comfy on their own terms and if they want to ignore him with atheism then I feel god would be comfortable allowing them to do that. Actually im not even sure god punishes Satanists (doesnt Satan do that?).
If someone on the street who didnt know you didnt trust you, you think they are being blasphemous? If you dont think its blasphemous for a stranger not to trust you then why would God? Wouldnt God be 500 times more forgiving than you? So why would you take the time to bother an atheist unless you just wanna rub their face in **** and that is your only real secret motivation.
If atheists are right, there is no God and therefore nothing to blaspheme against.
Satan has no room for doubt. He knows the "truth" whereas the rest of us can only live in hope and faith or whatever.
My fellow Discordians have it WAY easier. Eris is absolutely bonkers, and doesn't give a **** about anything!
I'm fairly sure atheists aren't constantly planning the downfall of the human race.
Only fairly sure, though.
Sounds like Eris knows not what Eris does.
Eris knows it doesn't matter.
But she's got a sense of humor about it!
I swear, Christians are so grim sometimes.
If? No, Atheists are wrong. God clearly exists; except, possibly to Atheists.
Not constantly? Are you saying they sometimes or often plan the downfall of the human race. My guess is that they probably are not even considering the impact they have on themselves.
I don't know a single atheist who is ignorant of the potential impact they are having on themselves. Thanks to folks like you and yours, whenever it's discovered that I (and many people close to me) are atheists, we're inevitably and predictably lectured on the eternal damnation that we're dooming ourselves to. So don't think for a picosecond that atheists are atheists due to ignorance. We've all been proselytized more times than we can count. Which, in a way, is funny because if we're right (even though in your infinite wisdom you've already declared impossible) is no different than you having spent your whole life being lectured and threatened due to your lack of belief in leprechauns.
Isn't that why you come here?
Well, not where dishonesty of claim is concerned.Nothing lame about it.
What is the difference between an Atheist who speaks blaspheme against God and Jesus versus Satan?
Doesn't Satan do the same?
Everyone is allowed to have their own thoughts; therefore, anyone can be blasphemous. Outspoken critics of Christianity are most certainly being blasphemous. They denigrate God by denigrating God directly, as in God doesn't exist or indirectly by denigrating God's creations.
One always has the ability to know God. If one chooses not to know God and speaks in a denigrating way God, Jesus, the Bible, and about his creations, that person is blasphemous.
Interesting you should bring up forgiving. You may need to go to the Philosophy section of DP as there is a discussion there about forgiving and that forgiving is garbage. Maybe you could straighten them out.
As for my motivation, it is rather simple. I now understand many Atheists. I have not always been able to make statements like the opening post, but I now recognize it. If Atheists want God to forgive them, they need to seek God's grace. I recommend it.
No. The statement was not about me, it was about his incorrect statement that atheists don't understand what we're doing to ourselves by not believing, when yes, we understand the supposed consequences all too well, we just aren't swayed by the "agree with us or suffer for-ev-er!" shtick.
If? No, Atheists are wrong. God clearly exists; except, possibly to Atheists.
Everyone is allowed to have their own thoughts; therefore, anyone can be blasphemous. Outspoken critics of Christianity are most certainly being blasphemous. They denigrate God by denigrating God directly, as in God doesn't exist or indirectly by denigrating God's creations.
One always has the ability to know God. If one chooses not to know God and speaks in a denigrating way God, Jesus, the Bible, and about his creations, that person is blasphemous.
Interesting you should bring up forgiving. You may need to go to the Philosophy section of DP as there is a discussion there about forgiving and that forgiving is garbage. Maybe you could straighten them out.
As for my motivation, it is rather simple. I now understand many Atheists. I have not always been able to make statements like the opening post, but I now recognize it. If Atheists want God to forgive them, they need to seek God's grace. I recommend it.
Well, not where dishonesty of claim is concerned.
Uh huh. Well, fortunately for the atheist crowd, something isn't true just because someone makes an unsupported declarative statement. Post your irrefutable proof that "God clearly exists", collect your millions and be the savior of all mankind and most beloved person on Earth. Or, and this is obviously the better option, accept that God is just a belief and there is a possibility that God doesn't actually exist, for belief doesn't equal fact.
I don't know a single atheist who is ignorant of the potential impact they are having on themselves. Thanks to folks like you and yours, whenever it's discovered that I (and many people close to me) are atheists, we're inevitably and predictably lectured on the eternal damnation that we're dooming ourselves to. So don't think for a picosecond that atheists are atheists due to ignorance. We've all been proselytized more times than we can count. Which, in a way, is funny because if we're right (even though in your infinite wisdom you've already declared impossible) is no different than you having spent your whole life being lectured and threatened due to your lack of belief in leprechauns.
Satan has a devilishly sweet tongue.
Well my topic was about "If a stranger passing you on the street doesnt trust you, would you be offended"? And you seem to want to go into a topic about God's wrath.
If you think that God would be mad because you ADMIT A TRUTH that you do not know God you think its a sin. Yet you walk by people every single day who do not trust you, because you are a stranger. If you are that scared of God then deep down you believe God is a big giant baby God who is wrathful over attention. Until God comes down and talks to you mouth to mouth don't shame people because in the end YOU could be the one God judges.
It is very unnatural to threaten people that dont trust you and that is EXACTLY what you are doing, its a form of using Gods name in vain. Youre desire is to use God as a threat and have him love you more than other people.
God KNOWS that humans are much more unforgiving than him which is why he taught us that the Sins of the Father can punish the son. Because humans pay back their vengeance 100 fold. Kind of like how you dismiss people who don't join your cult. Its a dichotomy where you use your obsession of love to hate, if people don't love the exact way you do.
Nothing is more uncertain or heavily debated than the existence of God. His existence is clearly not clear.
The question that really seems too challenging for some is how does one go about blaspheming anyone or anything, the existence of which or whom one lacks belief in?
Furthermore, the equation to Satan falls right over when one consider that he, by all accounts heard, can be accused of just about anything but not of doubting the existence of a god.
Showing any claims made here of understanding atheists at all to be highly risible.
Fortunately premises implied like these lack the significance of numbers to confirm in any way that Christians are generally under-equipped in intellect, as anyone having dealings with a greater number of Christians will of necessity come to realize.
Not constantly? Are you saying they sometimes or often plan the downfall of the human race. My guess is that they probably are not even considering the impact they have on themselves.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?