My argument or statement has nothing to do with the legal or illegal nature of the vandalism, nothing at all. It has to do with a mean spirited and tasteless attack on religion for no other purpose than to insult a belittle, as well as the vandalism being a similar act.
People exercising rights are rarely at fault. Your anger is misplaced and it seems to be rooted in your desire to blame atheists for expressing themselves. Freedom...learn to live with it.
So cry some more. Oh boo hoo it's a free country and you don't like how it played out. It doesn't mean the atheists did anything more than exercise a right. I don't understand why people cannot live by the duties and consequences of freedom.
Atheist Action Halts Calif. Nativity Display; Churches Go to Court
Just so I get this right, these churches are suing the government claiming their rights to freedom of speech were violated because the government wouldn't provide them a soapbox and place in the park?
Found this gem lower down...
So the city ended the practice because the religulous were vandalizing the other displays.
No argument so now you resort to personal attacks. Very classy.
No argument so now you resort to personal attacks. Very classy.
Not a personal attack, just a statement of fact.
The ones responsible for the cancellation are the vandals, not the atheists. Sorry if your personal bias wishes it was more. But reality is as it is. Deal with it.
"Religions are all alike -- founded on fables and mythologies." Another sign read, "Happy Solstice."
would you please point out the personal attack as i missed it
would you please point out the personal attack as i missed it
Blatant personal attack and hyperbole, period.
Please don't insult my intelligence. Again they were both party's to it, period. One instigated and the other broke the law. If you can't see the reality, that it's on you.
Some tend to whine and cry about personal attacks when they have no rational defense for their arguments.
I don't need to qualify my argument to someone who does not like the answer and then complains about it, then accuses me of crying about. Think about it.
The one's at fault are those infringing upon rights, not those exercising them. End of story.
I'd say you have a harder problem qualifying the argument in the first place.
End of YOUR view of the story. My argument and/or comments have nothing to do with rights, laws etc. Both sides were at fault, period. If you don't like it, too bad.
Exactly! Your argument does not account for rights. And that is why you fail.
Then why are you ignoring my statements of fact about my argument and making personal attacks? So no, that would be wrong yet again.
Because my argument has nothing to do with rights, or law as I have said about 30 times now. Do I have to keep repeating that or are you just going to keep repeating the same thing over and over again like another poster? Hell I have all night for you to go: "I am not listening to blackdog la la la."
Thanks again for stating why your argument is failure.
Hehehehehehe! The only thing that fails here is your lack of understanding the written language of my posts.
I've made no personal attack and have considered what you said. Wrong doing is on those who infringe upon rights, not those exercising them. This is a consequence of freedom.
I understand it just fine. Your argument is exactly why we have a democratic republic based on the rights of the individual and not a strict democracy.
Yes you did, don't be dishonest about it. What do you think saying "So cry some more. Oh boo hoo" It is also baiting as well. Again my argument has nothing to do with rights. I can say it 100 more times if you like.
It was misdemeanor vandalism, I refuse to debate Constitutional law over misdemeanor vandalism. It was not the point of my statement and has nothing to do with it. Give them the $25.00 fine and be done with your lame ass argument. Oh man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?