- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 43,602
- Reaction score
- 26,256
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
aquapub said:Biased At The Keyboard.
Republicans yawn and chuckle at danarhea's obssession with generating phony outrage at the president. :roll:
danarhea said:You didnt even read the whole post before you started off on your :spin:
Did you read the part where I bashed the Democrats? Of course, you didnt. I must be an angel to bash the Democrats, but I am the devil himself if I bash Bush, right?
The phoney outrage is in your court, along with the collateral hypocrisy.
KCConservative said:3 responses in 3 days. Dana's numbers are coming up. :lol:
If your post was meant to be sacastic you are definitely a traitor and hate America.Inuyasha said:Yes please don't criticize the Commander in Thief. Do you want the nation to progress or something. You know the man is perfect (a perfect what i don't know). Besides if you find fault you hate America, didn't you know that. Now about that jackass Bill Clinton well that's something else. He certainly ruined this country and out reputation. What nerve of that bastid lowering the deficit, I could just go on and on. How dare you chastise George Bush you mean thing you.
No need to thank me. Actually, I am responsible for reviving many of dana's dead threads. If you look past page one of any category, you'll find many of his threads with very few responses and many with no replies at all. This is the 8th post of the current thread. Notice that only one of the eight actually deal with the lame topic, and that is dana's original post. :lol: Hey, glad I could help. :lol:BWG said:Yours makes 5 and mine is 6. Thanks for the support! :rofl
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/15/AR2006031502320.htmlBrown Ignored Disaster Plan, New Report Says
By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 16, 2006; Page A03
Michael D. Brown, former head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, deliberately ignored a new national disaster plan and circumvented his boss, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, in trying to manage the federal response to Hurricane Katrina directly with the White House, according to a new House report.
By disregarding the National Response Plan, finished in 2004, Brown deprived "the nation of an opportunity to determine whether the NRP worked," the House investigation concludes in an addendum to its Feb. 15 report, "A Failure of Initiative," scheduled for release today.
Wow!....Maybe someone should fire him...hipsterdufus said:Heckuva Job Brownie. More incompetence revealed:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/15/AR2006031502320.html
cnredd said:Wow!....Maybe someone should fire him...
Wait...nevermind...
The single word most frequently associated with George W. Bush today is "incompetent,"and close behind are two other increasingly mentioned descriptors: "idiot" and "liar." All three are mentioned far more often today than a year ago.
hipsterdufus said:
millsy said:This gives a great commentary on politics today. A certain number of people are going to think the president is bad no matter what, and that everything he does is bad. Also, a number of people will think he is great no matter what, and that everything he does is right.
While "incompetent" and "idiot" went up so did "good".
How is that possible?
Also, (and I do identify myself as a Christian, and I am not an anti religion liberal) I find it funny that "Christian" went up. Could it be that the Radical Christian Right, having run out of other good things to say went simply with "Christian".
hipsterdufus said:It's not that hard to understand if you look at the data closely.
The reason that "good" went up is that other positives like "integrity", "leader","fair" and "excellent" went down, some weren't even mentioned in the latest data.
So, if you're an unabashed Bush supporter you say "good" rather than saying anything negative. Even that is a backhanded compliment.
KCConservative said:Interesting. How do you "know" this about the people polled? Further, what consequences will Bushh suffer as a result of these findings? My guess is he won't be running any more political races.
And finally, New Rule: Just because we have an obligation to rebuild New Orleans doesn't mean we have to put it back in the same place. For $200 billion, we could put the French Quarter on the moon. Why don't we put it someplace it can stay out of harm and do some good? After all, New Orleans is the Big Easy, and a lot of America is uptight. Which is why I say we put New Orleans in Kansas.
What do you say, Kansas? Put down your hoes and come meet some. Welcome New Orleans to the land that fun forgot. An infusion of color and gayness in the dry Kansas plain. Why, it'll be as if they shot "The Wizard of Oz" on location. You're going to love it! New Orleans is one of the great towns. It's my kind of town, an outpost of free living and sophistication in a sea of - well, now, sea.
You can't tell me that the giant swath of red America that Kansas sits in the middle of wouldn't benefit from thousands of insane Creoles who understand that hangovers only happen to people foolish enough to stop drinking. I read this week that the strippers have gone back to work in New Orleans. They don't even have clothes, and already they're taking them off. Kansas could use some of that spirit.
It could use some jazz, some blues...some blacks. The people of New Orleans are the most tolerant of all Americans. I mean, for Christ's sake, they put up with Anne Rice! And as an extra bonus, they're French, and that'll really **** off Bush. When the French land right in the middle of Bob Dole's Viagra farm.
So, don't think of it as a million-and-a-half black people moving in next door. Think of it as the "March of the Penguins." Only, you know, with a million-and-a-half black people.
Yes, I see a shining city on a plain. New Orleans, Kansas. Where people are learning. They're learning that a gay pride parade isn't something to fear; it's something to laugh at. So what do you say, Kansas? They need a home. You need to get the stick out of your a**. It's a win-win! Come on, Kansas, show some curiosity, show some compassion. But most of all, show us your t*ts!!
hipsterdufus said:It's just a theory. Like evolution or gravity.
BTW - Here's Bill Maher from last night's Real Time. He was talking about McCain becoming a supporter of ID and Hillary getting all up in arms about flag burning. In general the dumbing down by presidential candidates to the LCD.
I'm paraphrasing.
"Why do we have to nominate candidates that can get elected in Kanasas?"
I immediately thought of you KC after wiping the Guiness off my nose.
You live in Missouri? Show me!Originally posted by KCConservative:
Tell me, do you feel silly having spent all that effort taking pot shots at the state of Kansas while I live in Missouri?
KCConservative said:And what about this reminded you of me? Could it be that you think I am from Kansas? Tell me, do you feel silly having spent all that effort taking pot shots at the state of Kansas while I live in Missouri?
By the way, I performed at a recent Katrina benefit here in Kansas City. We raised hundreds of thousands of dollars for Katrina victims and found over 300 residences for people to relocate to in town. In addition, I have already written my check for the annual Kansas City AIDS Walk which is on April 22nd. I walk and perform in that even every year and have done so for the last 18 years. It seems Bill Maher and you have a few things to learn about my city's compassion for Katrina victims, the gay population and simple geography. Kansas City is in Missouri, not Kansas, and it's where jazz was born.
Oh, and what about answering that question on consequences Bush might suffer as a result of this new poll. Any theory?
And how does somebody from Kansas sound, hip? :roll:hipsterdufus said:Oh well, you're right on the border either way. You certainly sound like you're from Kansas.
hipsterdufus said:Consequences for Bush - zero. Ideally the administration would take a closer look at themselves, step back, and try to figure out how they can right their sinking ship of blundering incompetence. Don't hold your breath.
Then make your case. What will be his consequence?millsy said:If you are saying that the left should stop trying to beat the President because he won't be running again, so it doesn't matter how low his numbers go, than I agree with you. However the idea that polling the way the President currently is bares zero consequence is off the mark, in my opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?