• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

As AG of Kalifornikation, why did Harris protect pedophile PRIE$T$?

Zappa

Zappa

Banned
Joined
Jun 28, 2024
Messages
736
Reaction score
452
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?
Click to expand...
Why was former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert an actual PEDOPHILE??

Why did Hastert pay over $1 million in hush money for years to one of the boys he molested?

Why did his Repug colleagues in Congress try to protect Hastert from these allegations?
 
This is about Harris.

Do try to address the topic.

I understand, it’s difficult for Leftists to do that, but why not try?

Or do you condone Harris protecting pedophile priests?

What do Leftists want to call them? MAPS? I’m sure you Leftists know the thing. Being Leftists and all.
 
PeteEU said:
Oh boy, the Drumphs are getting desperate...you really want to go down the pedophile route...?
Click to expand...
Yes.

It’s why I asked about Kamala protecting pedophile priests.

She also got gobs of cash from the church.

Coincidence?

Seems she’s not bothered by pedophilia.
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...
Lol, im sure she's a pedophile herself 🤣
 
Zappa said:
This is about Harris.

Do try to address the topic.

I understand, it’s difficult for Leftists to do that, but why not try?

Or do you condone Harris protecting pedophile priests?

What do Leftists want to call them? MAPS? I’m sure you Leftists know the thing. Being Leftists and all.
Click to expand...
You condone the Republican Party's protection of Hastert. That's why you still vote for that disgraced party.
 
Zappa said:
This is about Harris.

Do try to address the topic.

I understand, it’s difficult for Leftists to do that, but why not try?

Or do you condone Harris protecting pedophile priests?

What do Leftists want to call them? MAPS? I’m sure you Leftists know the thing. Being Leftists and all.
Click to expand...
It is my understanding that the RIGHT doesn't want to prosecute religi9ous figures, no?
After all, they are all defending when they get busted. Yelling something like "lawfare"
 
"Before Harris was elected district attorney in 2003, a U.S. Supreme Court decision made it impossible to pursue criminal prosecutions of child sexual abuse cases after statutes of limitation had expired. For many victims, that left lawsuits in civil court as the only path for seeking justice.

After Harris took office as DA in 2004, attorneys representing abuse survivors in civil cases asked her office to release church records on abusive priests that had been gathered by her predecessor, Terence Hallinan.

Harris refused, a decision her office said was intended to protect the identities of clergy abuse victims. "It would be virtually impossible to release records without compromising the identity of the victims," two of her top aides said in a joint letter."

The person doing the most complaining about Harris was Joey Piscitelli, who apparently is probably an ardent Trump supporter. Its terrible he was sexually abused, but he got money.

"In 2006, Piscitelli won his civil suit against the Salesians of Don Bosco, a Catholic religious order that employed his abuser, the Rev. Stephen Whelan, after a jury trial. The verdict was upheld on appeal two years later."

My guess is he's voting for a sexual abuser who stole money from kids with cancer.
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...

Is defending a pedophile a good thing or a bad thing? Right-wingers are never consistent on this.
 
NuffSaid said:
"Before Harris was elected district attorney in 2003, a U.S. Supreme Court decision made it impossible to pursue criminal prosecutions of child sexual abuse cases after statutes of limitation had expired. For many victims, that left lawsuits in civil court as the only path for seeking justice.

After Harris took office as DA in 2004, attorneys representing abuse survivors in civil cases asked her office to release church records on abusive priests that had been gathered by her predecessor, Terence Hallinan.

Harris refused, a decision her office said was intended to protect the identities of clergy abuse victims. "It would be virtually impossible to release records without compromising the identity of the victims," two of her top aides said in a joint letter."

The person doing the most complaining about Harris was Joey Piscitelli, who apparently is probably an ardent Trump supporter. Its terrible he was sexually abused, but he got money.

"In 2006, Piscitelli won his civil suit against the Salesians of Don Bosco, a Catholic religious order that employed his abuser, the Rev. Stephen Whelan, after a jury trial. The verdict was upheld on appeal two years later."

My guess is he's voting for a sexual abuser who stole money from kids with cancer.
Click to expand...
Of course this matter is much more complicated then the OPs title. Always is with MAGA propaganda.
 
Zappa said:
Yes.

It’s why I asked about Kamala protecting pedophile priests.

She also got gobs of cash from the church.

Coincidence?

Seems she’s not bothered by pedophilia.
Click to expand...
Sigh...so you are bothered that Kamala possibly did what any other AG across the is does daily..

But see to have no problems with Trump being heavily linked to pedophile over the last 40 years.. and being a friend and client of Epstein... A mand who stayed in camera that he would date his own daughter and has also admitted barging in on naked underage girls at one of his pageants..

So..you sure you want to go down the pedophile route?
 
PeteEU said:
Sigh...so you are bothered that Kamala possibly did what any other AG across the is does daily..

But see to have no problems with Trump being heavily linked to pedophile over the last 40 years.. and being a friend and client of Epstein... A mand who stayed in camera that he would date his own daughter and has also admitted barging in on naked underage girls at one of his pageants..

So..you sure you want to go down the pedophile route?
Click to expand...
The MAGA folly
Screenshot_20240824-175410.webp
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...
It was because the statute of limitations had elapsed, making it impossible to prosecute them.
 
Zappa said:
This is about Harris.

Do try to address the topic.

I understand, it’s difficult for Leftists to do that, but why not try?

Or do you condone Harris protecting pedophile priests?

What do Leftists want to call them? MAPS? I’m sure you Leftists know the thing. Being Leftists and all.
Click to expand...
Nice screen name. Frank would not have been amused.
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...
What the hell is KNEWZ dot com?
And who is KNEWZ staff, the writer of the article?

The shit sources you righties share here, they're mind-boggling.
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...
Oh no.
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...
There's a small group of avid fisherman here. PM me and I will put you in touch with them.
 
Zappa said:
Why did she fail to prosecute pedophile priests? There are none in California? San Francisco? Really?

Protect the children?

Do her job?

The previous AG had assembled significant evidence. She dropped it all?

Was it because of the significant contributions from the Church?

Or does she think pedophiles are ok?

Click to expand...
These are the weird ridiculous posts we just don't need.

As stupid as when they called Trump a pedophile or Biden. No place for this shit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom