- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 54,171
- Reaction score
- 59,620
- Location
- Tucson, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You gotta get ugly to recruit women into combat, a top female Army officer says.
Col. Lynette Arnhart has declared war on featuring pretty women soldiers in Army public affairs materials — and Capitol Hill lawmakers are livid.
Unless they are equally careful to portray men as model quality and dressed similarly to the gals, ie adjustments made to enhance sexiness, then facts are.... it is sexist. If the military can't recruit without sleights of protrayal of women, then we need to know that and accept the reduction in the numbers of service men.Army officer wants 'more average looking women' in public affairs materials - NY Daily News I'm not sure what forum to put this in but if someone wants it moved then please feel free. Anyway, it seems that a female officer is in hot water for suggesting that the Army is using women who are "too attractive" in its promotional material and now folks are saying her message is sexist. Come on now folks, how far down this rabbit hole do we need to go? It's not like the model they used was in a bikini wearing strategically placed claymores or something. Hell, I don't even know what to think any more. So you can't use models that are "too attractive" and you don't want to stereotype by using someone that is "too plain" so what the hell are you supposed to do!!?? For the love of God....the military has a specific purpose. Please, for the sake of the nation lay off all this PC garbage and just let them do their damned job!!!
Arnhart wrote that the pic “shows a pretty woman, wearing makeup while on deployed duty. Such photos undermine the rest of the message (and may even make people ask if breaking a nail is considered hazardous duty.)”
“In general, ugly women are perceived as competent while pretty women are perceived as having used their looks to get ahead,” she wrote in the email, first reported by Politico.
Army officer wants 'more average looking women' in public affairs materials - NY Daily News
I'm not sure what forum to put this in but if someone wants it moved then please feel free.
Anyway, it seems that a female officer is in hot water for suggesting that the Army is using women who are "too attractive" in its promotional material and now folks are saying her message is sexist.
Come on now folks, how far down this rabbit hole do we need to go? It's not like the model they used was in a bikini wearing strategically placed claymores or something.
Hell, I don't even know what to think any more. So you can't use models that are "too attractive" and you don't want to stereotype by using someone that is "too plain" so what the hell are you supposed to do!!??
For the love of God....the military has a specific purpose. Please, for the sake of the nation lay off all this PC garbage and just let them do their damned job!!!
The majority of women I worked with in the Army or Air Force were average looking women, neither ugly nor overly pretty. In the medical corps, there were more that were on the pretty side, and only a very few of those that I would want beside me in a firefight.
I don't know if good looks have any correlation with a lack of fighting capability, but the average to butt ugly ones seemed to be better at dealing with it when the crap hit the fan.
The Colonel in this article knows more about what she needs in her troops than some PC police. Although, after looking at the picture, I thought the Corporal looked rather average for a female Army soldier. Throw some mud on her and that would take care of it.
Unless they are equally careful to portray men as model quality and dressed similarly to the gals, ie adjustments made to enhance sexiness, then facts are.... it is sexist. If the military can't recruit without sleights of protrayal of women, then we need to know that and accept the reduction in the numbers of service men.
When you force women to exercise every day it can be tougher to find ugly ones.
The fact of the matter is that using attractive models yields more customers, or in the case of the Military, new troops. They're going to use pictures of attractive Service Members doing badass things, because that's what draws people in. It's a time tested and proven method, so why stop doing what works?
It's just silly for her to demand that we not use the image of the best and beautiful. Everybody does it, from police to the US Postal Service. "Equality" has no place in the US Military.true enough, recruitment posters for the DEA and FBI and USMS I constantly used to see didn't have-for example-that infamous DEA agent who shot himself in his lower leg with a Glock in front of a bunch of school kids.
It's just silly for her to demand that we not use the image of the best and beautiful. Everybody does it, from police to the US Postal Service. "Equality" has no place in the US Military.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?