- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
- Messages
- 133,631
- Reaction score
- 30,937
- Location
- Bagdad, La.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Doesn't support your statement that he spent more time being an activist than a soldier now does it?
Care to retract that statement or would you like to try again?
Dan Choi obviously violated Army Regulations. He is a discredit to his unit, his service and sets a piss poor example for his men.
Any leader that doesn't live by the same standards that he expects from his men, is a piece of **** and doesn't deserve to wear the uniform.
I have to wonder if you would be this foul, acidic, and bilious in your posting if it were a straight officer protesting gay marriage or supporting DADT at a rally...
You're goddamned right I would. The regulations apply to everyone, no matter what their politics are.
Anyone, regardless of rank, who doesn't live by and enforce the regulations and the standards of the service, no matter the reason, is a piece of **** and doesn't deserve to wear the uniform.
How does that go about answering your question?
I'm not sure that I buy it...but if its true....good for you!
You're goddamned right I would. The regulations apply to everyone, no matter what their politics are.
Anyone, regardless of rank, who doesn't live by and enforce the regulations and the standards of the service, no matter the reason, is a piece of **** and doesn't deserve to wear the uniform.
How does that go about answering your question?
It makes an effort to answer it. However, I would be lying if I said I believed your rant would be as strong were it something other than this.
I don't give a **** if you believe me, or not. I guess only time will tell.
I didn't really care if you did, sport. I simply find your mouthfoaming rant a bit too impassioned over this issue to be about the regulation and not the circumstance. If it walks like a duck and all that.
I guess the same could be said for you, if this issue didn't hit so close to home. Eh? The next time a birfer refuses to deploy, you gonna give him a break?
I am not the one breaking down into rants and noxious cussing over the issue. And no, I am not going to cut the birfer a break. I also don't think you can show me one post where I insisted that Choi be offered a break either so the point you thought you were making...well, you didn't.
IAW, you're arguing, just to argue? Isn't there a term for that?
Yes...it's called "D-E-B-A-T-E"...you know...as in the name of the web site.
Oh, dude...I thought you knew....
How does this rule strengthen the military is the more appropriate question.
Of course it's called, "debate", but since when did my feelings become the topic of debate? I thought this thread about Dan Choi and his opposition to DADT. I thought you new.
Doesn't support your statement that he spent more time being an activist than a soldier now does it?
Care to retract that statement or would you like to try again?
Not for someone who doesn't care bout the rules
You didn't answer my question. How does DADT strengthen the military?
You didn't answer my question. How does DADT strengthen the military?
You didn't answer my question. How does DADT strengthen the military?
That isn't the OP. He broke the rules. Doesn't matter if it is DADT or uniform code. Stop making excuses.
Moderator's Warning: |
Actually, that IS in the OP. DD posed that question in his post, so it is not only a viable question, but certainly a part of the thread. If you choose not to answer, just say so, but saying it is not part of the OP is flat out wrong.
That isn't the OP. He broke the rules. Doesn't matter if it is DADT or uniform code. Stop making excuses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?