• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are You OK With A Racist President, Republicans?

OscarLevant

Gadfly Extraordinaire
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 3, 2018
Messages
16,876
Reaction score
7,397
Location
San Diego
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Just wonderin'.


 
I'm not okay with a racist President at all.

Good thing Trump isn't a racist, right?

Of course, being a racist was one of Obama's failings. That's one of the reasons I didn't like the guy.
 
I'm not okay with a racist President at all.

Good thing Trump isn't a racist, right?

Of course, being a racist was one of Obama's failings. That's one of the reasons I didn't like the guy.

No ones interested in a Birthers bizzaro universe opinion about Obama being a racist.
 
Yet another post alleging Trump is a racist. Wow that is original.

Give me a reliable link confirming your allegation.

In other words you are fine with the president telling people to go back where they came from?
 
I'll just repeat what I said in the thread in the poll section today;



 
I don't know if Trump is a racist or not.

I do know that simply declaring that he is one does not make it true.

This is the problem I have with so many people who use the tactics of moral panic.

First they declare that they hold the moral high ground. Then they use this moral high ground to "judge" those they disagree with. They then declare those they judge to be enemies of their ideologies guilty of some form of immorality. Finally they liberally apply one or more demonizing labels by fiat.

The next step is to continue to use such labels against both their main target, and anyone who dares to side with that target.

From that point on it is one ad hominin after another, and their "truth" is reinforced by those who seek inclusion (and thereby safety from being targeted) in their echo chambers of denigration.

So while I don't know if Trump is a racist or not, I need to repeat that constant declarations that he is one still doesn't make it true. :coffeepap:
 
Last edited:
In other words you are fine with the president telling people to go back where they came from?

How is that racist??
Is it racist simply because it came out of Trump’s mouth?
I’m sure there have been many a Democrat and probably Republicans that told Trump to go back where he came from.
 
How is that racist??
Is it racist simply because it came out of Trump’s mouth?
I’m sure there have been many a Democrat and probably Republicans that told Trump to go back where he came from.

Feigning ignorance of the racial implications of "go back where you came from" is barely a step up from actually being ignorant.
 
Just wonderin'.
Most republicans feel like they have to be okay with it. They have to wait him out, while supporting his pro corporate regressive, anti regulatory, anti environment policies That they feel warmly blessed by. There is a sizable minority of republicans with white nationalist sentiments, who feel warmly blessed by his racism.

I have long since ceased to be interested in the distinction. Those than enable his racism, should be treated exactly like those who share it. I think history will not dwell much on what kind of republican each is either. They will almost all wear the same stain.
 
Last edited:
Feigning ignorance of the racial implications of "go back where you came from" is barely a step up from actually being ignorant.

Exactly how does that prove racism? I realize that throwing the race card is SOP among many on the left.
 

It's something the Trump haters do every chance they get. It's called "playing the race card".

 
Feigning ignorance of the racial implications of "go back where you came from" is barely a step up from actually being ignorant.

Based on your comment I now know why the term “racist” is overused.
I have to say 90% of the country are racist, both democrats and republicans.

Just the other day I told me wife I hated rap music. I guess I’m racist.
I’m not in favor of open borders. I guess I’m racist. If a white Canadian sneaks across the border I guess I would be racist against white Canadians.
 
I don't know if Trump is a racist or not.

OK, maybe the better question is "Are you OK with a President who acts like a white nationalist and openly appeals to white nationalists?"

It's the same question, really, but then we don't have to do the dance - "what does he BELIEVE?" when no one can know the answer. And it doesn't matter what he believes - he's President and he's sending that message.


OK, so we can judge what he does, and what he did recently was ape what we've all seen on YouTube - dumb, mean people confronting someone who isn't white speaking a foreign language and telling them, "GO BACK WHERE YOU CAME FROM!"

That's what he did. It's not an ad hominem to point that out - it happened.
 
How is that racist??
Is it racist simply because it came out of Trump’s mouth?
I’m sure there have been many a Democrat and probably Republicans that told Trump to go back where he came from.

Back to NYC?

He's got a lot of white enemies. Which ones has he told to go back where they came from? None is the answer. And telling minorities, non-whites, to go back to Mexico/Africa/Middle East/India is an old, obvious, racist/bigoted trope. It's sending a very old and honored American tradition of white nationalism.
 
Exactly how does that prove racism? I realize that throwing the race card is SOP among many on the left.

Are you making a distinction between white nationalism, which what Trump did clearly reflected, was intended to appeal to white nationalists, versus racism?

There is obviously a difference in the dictionary meaning, but not much in real life I don't think - the Venn diagram of racists, white supremacists, racial or ethnic bigots and white nationalists wouldn't be overlapping but close enough such that the distinction won't be very informative.
 
Do you know how ridiculous Democrats who scream "racist!" all the time look to people?

In their echo chambers, it is accepted. Remember this quote from a hollywood bimbo in november of 1972

How did Nixon Win? EVERYONE I KNOW voted for McGovern. American liberalism is nothing of the sort. It has become reactionary and close-minded.
 

I reject everything you say as BS TDS propaganda. "white nationalism" is the current dog whistle to the collectivist left.
 
They were fine with racist Lincoln.

 
I reject everything you say as BS TDS propaganda. "white nationalism" is the current dog whistle to the collectivist left.

OK, so you're playing ostrich. :roll:

The white nationalists, those who claim the label, didn't miss the message he sent. And a bunch of conservatives who aren't Trump lemmings heard the message clear as a bell as well. So you're objectively wrong that only the "collectivist left" can see an old and ugly strain of white nationalism in his Tweets that's as American as apple pie.
 

NO I am rejecting your silly nonsense and I reject your stupid claims. You can scream all you want and I am going to laugh at your hysterical TDS
 
NO I am rejecting your silly nonsense and I reject your stupid claims. You can scream all you want and I am going to laugh at your hysterical TDS

LOL. You don't have to take my word for it - just look at the reaction of conservatives out there. See what they have to say. If they're not Trump fluffing cult members, they recognize what he's doing because it really is part of our ugly history that a lot of us thought we'd left behind, at least for someone representing us as President.

George Conway:

Here are a few examples:

George Conway:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...46e594de5d5_story.html?utm_term=.69a283f334bd


David French:


He's speaking to you here: David French on Twitter: "Take the Judge Curiel moment, mix in “****hole” countries, sprinkle in a few Tucker monologues, and you’ve got this miserable, hateful stew. But the truly depressing part will be the inevitable GOP gaslighting, rationalizations, and minimizations in his defense.… https://t.co/sjc0QGyBhV"

Trump supporting Geraldo Rivera:


I could keep going, but you're not fooling anyone with five minutes to spend looking around at the reaction of non-Trump cultists conservatives.

Here's Andrew Aglin of the Daily Stormer:




 
Last edited:
Just wonderin'.

The Dems are so full ****, they need a movement. They should rename their party to the Whiny Bitchy Little Girls Party, they are so annoying.
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…