freedomfighter
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2005
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Axismaster said:I am ashamed to be pro-life by those who can never moderate their stance.
freedomfighter said:You have nothing to be ashamed about pal, you are not pro life and i have proved it in a previous post, you are pro you/pro money you have no stance has you have stated, because you are safe you will support a pro choice candidate.
Axismaster said:Oh, I'm pro-life, and abortion would be restricted if it were up to me. Still, it is probably the last issue I actually care about. The only reason I am here talking about it is because this seems to be one of the most active forums. So I am moderately pro-life then. I am not like you single-issue guys.
Axismaster said:Oh, I'm pro-life, and abortion would be restricted if it were up to me. Still, it is probably the last issue I actually care about. The only reason I am here talking about it is because this seems to be one of the most active forums. So I am moderately pro-life then. I am not like you single-issue guys.
FISHX says, “I would gladly double my taxes to help save the weak and the unborn.”
”Better idea though instead of locking up the women/men seeking termination and euthanasia why not lock up the obs/gyno/ and doctors that carry out theses procedures?”
”Pro life is NOT just about termination of pregnancies.”
Ngdawg, you said, “Both abortions and out-of-wedlock birth statistics show a decline in the last 15 years-a good thing(the out of wedlock births being to teenagers-adult women's statistics have risen slightly”
AXISMASTER said, “I am pro-life myself but if I had to choose between doubling taxes and seeing abortion go on, I would let it go on.”
“You see, low taxes matter to me, but as a person who has since passed through the womb, I have no risk of being aborted.”
“That is why even though I am staunchly pro-life, I would vote for a pro-choice candidate if my self interests were represented by his views.”
“As for your idea of locking up doctors rather than women, I would hope it would go that way. I don't know if I could support a ban on abortion if they were locking up mothers, doctors, that is another story.”
“ Besides, most of those gynos deserve to be locked up, especially the male ones, because we all know why they became gynecologists! Probably for the same reason I have thought of becoming one someday”
Axismaster said:Besides, most of those gynos deserve to be locked up, especially the male ones, because we all know why they became gynecologists! Probably for the same reason I have thought of becoming one someday.
What I DID state, your misrepresentation aside, was that she was a cognitive "vegetable." She was NOT able to think, learn or dream! Sheesh, try to actually read what I say next time.freedomfighter said:Your original post Steen, do you want us to believe that you have a different meaning for cognitive than the dictionary, you said she was cognitive therefore able to think and learn was capable of thought and dreams,
Perhaps you are REALLY clueless about what is mean with a "vegetable" when discussing cognitive function?yet then you state that her brain had shrunk to half it's original size, which is it Steen was she cognitive or what ?.
That was the friggin' POINT!!!!! No sentient, cognitive thought!!!!Steen so you admit that your original post was wrong because you stated she was a cognitive "vegetable " which in itself is a misnomer as vegetables do not have the capacity for any sort of sentient cognitive thought.
Irrelevant. The ONLY requirement you set up for being "weak" was that she couldn't "defend herself against attack could she, tell everyone what she wanted or even protect herself from the elements"What is this rubbish, when was a carrot classed as human
Why don't you stop your lies and misrepresentations? Yeah, I won't even ask you to debate seriously, as you don't seem to have the interest, being busy misrepresenting my post instead.or do you have information that the rest of the scientific community have not.Stop with the stupid inane comments and debate seriously Steen.
And you are back to lying about me again. No surprise there, as that obviously is what prolifers do.Yet you actually claimed that she was cognitive Steen.
Bwahaha, this from a lying prolifer with only emotional arguments? What lame, hypocritical remark.If you think that is an attack maybe you are to sensitive too be debating such a emotional subject
AH, I wondered who it was. So FF is your spouse. yes, it had to be one of the liars from AiM.FISHX said:With people like you i am ashamed to be pro life you hypocrite.
steen said:AH, I wondered who it was. So FF is your spouse. yes, it had to be one of the liars from AiM.
Gilluin said:If abortion is made illegal I predict that you will see across the border abortion clinics, in canada and states that still premit abortion. Are we to fill the prisons with those seeking abortions in places where it is legal if they live in states that do not allow abortions? Prolifers better becare for what they wish for. Prolifers tend to be conservative and do not like taxes. They better get ready to pay, in taxes, for the extra prisons and social programs needed for all those abandoned children.
steen said:AH, I wondered who it was. So FF is your spouse. yes, it had to be one of the liars from AiM.
Bwahaha, this from a lying prolifer with only emotional arguments? What lame, hypocritical remark.
steen said:She was cognitively a vegetable. her brain had atrophied to half its size, she had no willful, aware function.
Good heavens. So you are another one who think a carrot is "weak"?
She WASN'T "cognitive."
She couldn't.
She couldn't.
And, for good meassure, you end off with an ad hominym. Yes, I am not surprised.:roll:
freedomfighter said:QUOTE]
What the hell? :shock: Dude, should you be taking your meds? Seriously.
vergiss said:What the hell? :shock: Dude, should you be taking your meds? Seriously.
(If you want to send the lawyers after me too, my name's <edited>)
vergiss said:Being called a liar should be the least of your worries. :screwy
(If you want to send the lawyers after me too, my name's <edited>.)
This sort of action again will result in your immediate and permanent banning from this forum.13. Privacy - Posting personal email addresses, full names, places of employment, and phone numbers (etc.) for the purpose of retaliation or revenge will not be tolerated. This is a breach in privacy. You will lose your posting privileges permanently.
mixedmedia said:/mode mode/
freedomfighter,
I realize that feelings can get pretty heady when in heated discussion about these issues but posting personal information about another member is clearly out of line. I realize you are fairly new here so allow me to refer to forum rules on such matters:
This sort of action again will result in your immediate and permanent banning from this forum.
vergiss, I removed your post with personal info, too. There's no need to expose yourself in that manner.
And to everyone posting on this thread....let's bring the fever pitch down a few degrees or this thread will be closed.
/mod mode/
13. Privacy - Posting personal email addresses, full names, places of employment, and phone numbers (etc.) for the purpose of retaliation or revenge will not be tolerated. This is a breach in privacy. You will lose your posting privileges permanently.
At Debate Politics we see freedom of speech as the right to communicate ideas. With this right comes the responsibility to choose your words carefully and respect the rights of others. Common sense dictates the difference between one expressing themselves and one who is disruptive. If you are focused on contributing to the community, you will not have to be concerned with being a disruption. Disruptive behavior, such as personal attacks, can lead to temporary or permanent revocation of posting privileges.
/mod mode/freedomfighter said:Well well i guess i did not break the rules as stated above, i did not post it for the purpose of revenge or retaliation but to inform him that i knew who he was and could therefore start legal proceedings against him as i stated in the post.So this is a clear case of moderator abuse and i would like admin to review your warning to me.
mixedmedia said:/mod mode/
If your intention was truly as you stated, which is odd to say the least, it could have easily been accomplished privately via personal message. Since you chose to do so publicly, you are in clear violation of forum rules. Please feel free to contact vauge, the site administrator, to air your grievances.
/mod mode/
mixedmedia said:vergiss, I removed your post with personal info, too. There's no need to expose yourself in that manner.
/mod mode/freedomfighter said:What about this one, did you miss this when you were consulting the rules to warn me, how about you warn those that attacked me personally, calling me a liar and claiming i had mental health problems, but we get used to bias towards pro choice, so now it looks even more like selective moderating and mod abuse.I will be taking this up with admin.
mixedmedia said:/mod mode/
The mod team does its best to keep flaming and personal attacks to a minimum, but cannot be expected to moderate every post made here at DP. If ever you feel personally attacked by another member, take note of the red & white triangle ("Report Bad Post") in the bottom left corner of every post. Use it.
As far as bias goes, I have moderated folks from both sides of this issue in the past, so I am confident that bias has not played a part in my actions here. In my own personal opinion, you have committed one of the most serious infractions one can on this site. I had the authority to take more serious action against you, but I chose not to.
/mod mode/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?