• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Are we on the precifice of World War 3

Are we on the precifice of World War 3


  • Total voters
    80
People have believed in MAD and so far it has worked. It has worked only because we had sane leaders in both countries. There is no guarantee that will last.

Again it would be suicide for either the U.S. or Russia if one sidee started a nuclear war....That does apply to North Korea, Iran orr some terrorist group........That is the scary part.
 
Again it would be suicide for either the U.S. or Russia if one sidee started a nuclear war....That does apply to North Korea, Iran orr some terrorist group........That is the scary part.

So you don't think North Korea or Iran would be committing suicide if they attempted a nuclear attack on the US? Why is that?
 
Ten posters actually believe we're poised on the cusp of WW3?

Wow.
 
Ten posters actually believe we're poised on the cusp of WW3?

Wow.
Conspiracy theorists are the ultimate evil conspiracy.
 
Let's hope so. Maybe we should ship them a few thousand tons of weed to help that process along.
What is: "What is the preface?"

OK, I'll take "LSD" for 1,000.
 
Everyone should have voted yes, just to see members post 'See! I told you!' They would cite this thread as evidence. But no, we ruined it.
 
So you don't think North Korea or Iran would be committing suicide if they attempted a nuclear attack on the US? Why is that?

The US has the military capability to totally destroy either or both of those nations. Would we?

That's the unanswered question.

Maybe as long as they think we might, we're safe, at least from them.
 
The results of this poll shock me.......All I can say is you people who voted no live in fantasy land..........I am usually pretty accurate on my political positions on the issues but hope and pray I am wrong about this one.
 
Nope. Im in the crowd of WW3 probably will never happen.

I would argue that it is happening right now and has for some time... WWIII is the war against radical Muslim terrorists. It is occurring the world over too...
 
The results of this poll shock me.......All I can say is you people who voted no live in fantasy land..........I am usually pretty accurate on my political positions on the issues but hope and pray I am wrong about this one.
We like our fantasy land and will fight to make it reality?
 
I voted yes simply because I'm always an optimist and I believe global wars could potentially in the future be the only thing that fixes our societies seeing as reform clearly won't.
 

I can agree with that.
 

Since the 60's/late-70's, Democrats have tried very hard NOT to lead the nation into another unjustified armed conflict. Fast-forward to today and you'll hear Republicans make the claim that Democrats are soft on using America's military might. Every time I hear that, I remember the exact same historical context as you. Yet, Republicans will continue to beat Democrats about the head over their willingness to seek peaceful solutions first, and use war only as a last resort. (Of course, many of them got it wrong when it came to authorizing the War in Iraq.)


I rest my case. :doh
 
The results of this poll shock me.......All I can say is you people who voted no live in fantasy land..........I am usually pretty accurate on my political positions on the issues but hope and pray I am wrong about this one.

No, you're not.
 


One problem with "since the 60's", JFK was a hawk, his brother Bobby was even a bigger hawk.

Both the Democrats and Republicans were anti communist and pro military. During the Presidental election JFK vs. Nixon it came down to who would do a better job at stopping communist expansion in the world ?

It wasn't until 1970 when radical leftist (The New Left) began coming under the Democrat tent and first they hid behinde the "liberal" label when you started seeing anti-military and an anti war movement against any war that would be fought against communism or any form of socialism with in the Democrat Party.

It was during the 1970's when the true liberals with in the Democrat Party started leaving the party and came under the GOP tent, they were called neoconservatives. JFK Liberals who were anti communist and refused to surrender during the Cold War.

Now not all liberals fled from the Democrat Party. There still were Democrats who refused to surrender and wanted to continue fighting the Cold War. You had liberals like Rep. Charley Wilson (D-Tx.) who remained in the Party. Yep the same cocain sniffing, skirt chasing, partying Democrat that the movie "Charley Wilson's War" is based upon. The same liberal Democrat who got Congress to support the Mujadeen in Afghanistan by arming them with Stinger missiels.


History rest it's case.
 
Sorry but you just can't bury you head in the sands and hope the problems just go away.

They won't.

Nobody is denying that there are problems in the world. There are always problems in the world. That said, the idea that we're on the cusp of World War III (a globally encompassing cataclysm) is absurd.
 
I voted yes simply because I'm always an optimist and I believe global wars could potentially in the future be the only thing that fixes our societies seeing as reform clearly won't.

Can you imagine the destruction that would happen if nuclear devices were exploded in our major cities in this country? It would be devestating.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…