https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html
According to this, the Democrats became favorites of the rich.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States
Many of the highest-income counties, which are mostly in Maryland or Virginia, overwhelmingly vote for the Democrats during the last Presidential Elections.
But if you take a look on the last exit polls of Presidential Elections, people with a household income over 100,000$ per year voted for the Republican candidate, 55-45% or something like these, even Trump got more support than Clinton.
So, what is your opinion?
So, what is your opinion?
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html
According to this, the Democrats became favorites of the rich.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States
Many of the highest-income counties, which are mostly in Maryland or Virginia, overwhelmingly vote for the Democrats during the last Presidential Elections.
But if you take a look on the last exit polls of Presidential Elections, people with a household income over 100,000$ per year voted for the Republican candidate, 55-45% or something like these, even Trump got more support than Clinton.
So, what is your opinion?
I don't see the number of rich people who vote for a party to be especially meaningful. Look at the policies of the parties and ask if they serve the interests of the rich or are more inclusive of middle class and poor demographics as well and other larger ideas. That's why, when you look at the proposed polices and deregulations of the GOP this year, it's easy to see that Republicans' priorities favor corporatist and rich agendas over larger ideas such as public safety, health, choice, freedom and public services.
In general the Republocrats are the Corporate-Party for the new aristocracy. There are filthy rich people on both sides of that coin, and big Corp funding them both.
I don't see the number of rich people who vote for a party to be especially meaningful. Look at the policies of the parties and ask if they serve the interests of the rich or are more inclusive of middle class and poor demographics as well and other larger ideas. That's why, when you look at the proposed polices and deregulations of the GOP this year, it's easy to see that Republicans' priorities favor corporatist and rich agendas over larger ideas such as public safety, health, choice, freedom and public services.
The left claim to be the party representing the little guy, while they take millions in donations and pac money and let lobbyists wine and dine them. Wall Street had Hillary in their back pockets. This doesn't even get to the fact that liberal policies don't help the poor. Under liberals the rich continue to get richer while the poor continue to get poorer. It's all a talking game to buy votes. Why do you think Bernie was so popular? Because the little guy knows that Democrats don't represent them at all. Meanwhile Bernie is a millionaire, has several homes, and his wife is a big spender and being investigated for bank fraud.
The idea that republicans are the party of the rich is ridiculous. Both parties cater to the wealthy folks, especially their largest contributors. George Soros alone is worth over $25 billion and he has donated millions of his wealth to liberal-democratic causes.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html
According to this, the Democrats became favorites of the rich.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States
Many of the highest-income counties, which are mostly in Maryland or Virginia, overwhelmingly vote for the Democrats during the last Presidential Elections.
But if you take a look on the last exit polls of Presidential Elections, people with a household income over 100,000$ per year voted for the Republican candidate, 55-45% or something like these, even Trump got more support than Clinton.
So, what is your opinion?
You think? Most of the investment bankers and hedge fund guys I know are closer to Democrat. Or take the Kennedy type wealth.
In general the Republocrats are the Corporate-Party for the new aristocracy. There are filthy rich people on both sides of that coin, and big Corp funding them both.
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/07/opinion/how-did-the-democrats-become-favorites-of-the-rich.html
According to this, the Democrats became favorites of the rich.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-income_counties_in_the_United_States
Many of the highest-income counties, which are mostly in Maryland or Virginia, overwhelmingly vote for the Democrats during the last Presidential Elections.
But if you take a look on the last exit polls of Presidential Elections, people with a household income over 100,000$ per year voted for the Republican candidate, 55-45% or something like these, even Trump got more support than Clinton.
So, what is your opinion?
From what I see with the big banks they fund both parties equally.
Companies will often have to do that as they are dependent on political contacts and on legislation as well as treatment. Rich persons, families and holdings are a different category.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?