disneydude
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2006
- Messages
- 25,528
- Reaction score
- 8,470
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
You hate President Trump. You would go along with it if someone said he had a dick growing out of his head.
Well....Trump definitely is a huge dickhead so that probably wouldn't be a wrong diagnosis.
Look I know you're a Trump supporter and a little anxious about what is going on, and I have given you plenty of verifiable--credible links along with FOX News video's to everything. It's not just the Dossier file that this Russian investigation is about, it's everything that is on page 15 post # 145 of this thread, of which the Dossier file is not even mentioned. So I assume, you're trying to chip away at the Dossier file, to support a claim that everything else is FAKE news about the Russian investigation when it's not.
The Dossier file is something we know little about, other than investigators have verified some of it. Christopher Steele was interviewed by Robert Mueller, and the CEO of Fusion GPS met with the Senate Intelligence committee. We don't know what questions were answered, what they learned--they haven't released anything.
US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier - CNNPolitics
Yes, I will give a complete history of what I know about the Dossier file (with credible links) so that others on this board know what in the heck it is. I am not into 1 liners, yes & no answers--without links, video's and information to explain what is going on.
I think this is a very good question. Watch the entire 17 minute video FIRST--then comment and cast your vote. Are Senate & House Republicans complicit for not confronting Trump on his behavior and Lies?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent Responsibility to remove a sitting President who is regarded by many to be mentally unfit to hold this office?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is incapable of rising to the level of dignity & grace of the Presidency?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is not qualified nor competent to hold this office?
I think yes they do--which makes them "complicit."
Yes a lot of Republicans were looking at Ted Cruz. My concerns with him were that I knew him being born in Canada would have been played out to eternity, especially after Obama's birth certificate was an issue for a long time. I really don't go for GOP candidates that campaign on social issues, as I am a fiscal conservative, and prefer that candidates focus on on government issues they can do something about and not wander off into U.S. Supreme court already settled issues, that they won't be able to do anything about.
I like candidates that are totally honest, campaign on things that are realistic--and John Kasich was that person to me anyway.
We're talking about a link and a claim that is outrageously wrong ... and made 3 times now ... and which I corrected the first time you claimed it.
You screwed up a characterization of a video and misidentified Chris Steele.
Is that a picture of Chris Steele in your #163?
What does this link, your twice posted posted link, tell you about the dossier? https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...s-bond-n706376
My point was that no one should read your posts and assume what you posted is correct ... as I demonstrated.
As a consequence, that makes your posts radioactive.
:beatdeadhorse: If there is anything concrete that you disagree with (besides the picture of Christopher Steele, author of the Dossier file) in post # 163 on this thread which I verified with credible--trusted linked sources then respond back to me with your own credible verified links. I think you're just simply parroting what you have heard from Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. If you can't do that, then you get put on ignore.
For other news regarding the Russian investigations -including Fox News video's with verifiable trusted links go to this link and scroll down to post # 145.
https://www.debatepolitics.com/poll...nfronting-trump-his-behavior-and-lies-15.html
btw, flake was complicit.
link?
Your trusted links are CNN, Politico, the Hill and Wikipedia. Those aren't trusted links, they have been peddling anonymous stories for months and pissed away their credibility a while back.
Yeah I thought you would come back with that one. And yours are? So far NONE. Of course the FOX NEWS video's must have been FAKE too--:lol:
For those of you that are interested in these Russian investigations, go to this link and scroll down to post # 145.
https://www.debatepolitics.com/poll...nfronting-trump-his-behavior-and-lies-15.html
There has never been a President in this nation's history that was so naive or frankly stupid enough to make enemies out of the 3 most powerful agencies in this country. The media, our intelligence agencies, and the DOJ.
The more he calls the media FAKE, the more they will write & report. The more he denies the intelligence coming out of the CIA, the FBI, the Department of Homeland security and 14 other intelligence agencies, the more he implicates himself into a cover-up & the deeper they will dig. The more he insults and threatens the DOJ the more they will leak.
And YOU should really read this article. How you were brainwashed into believing all other news sources were FAKE.
Donald Trump breaks the conservative media - Business Insider
I have never seen anyone come across as a paid poster more than you. You and I both know Politico and CNN have had to issue retractions because they published/posted news later found out to be false because they trusted anonymous sources instead of following up with solid journalism. Discounting it with a cartoon isn't an argument. I take anything posted at just one news outlet with a grain of salt and I take narratives in which multiple sources agree on the way something impacts with the entire shaker.
If you really want to know whats going on in news, you should be a skeptic of both sides and gather multiple sources. You are only listening to one side of the story.
I'm not going to watch the video. Jeff Flake is not a hero. Yes, Republicans should've stood up to Trump from the start. It was far too easy for Trump to get everyone to fall in line. In fact, he didn't even really have to try.
I think this is a very good question. Watch the entire 17 minute video FIRST--then comment and cast your vote. Are Senate & House Republicans complicit for not confronting Trump on his behavior and Lies?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent Responsibility to remove a sitting President who is regarded by many to be mentally unfit to hold this office?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is incapable of rising to the level of dignity & grace of the Presidency?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is not qualified nor competent to hold this office?
I think yes they do--which makes them "complicit."
On one hand, we have the lies that we can easily take Trump to task on. Though those are many of the same ones that basically any president gets put to, as they begin their first term. Promises made on the campaign trail that are not followed through with, and the such.
Then we have the lies that they try to show us, but on further inspection we see that its just them taking his words out of context. Like so many times before like with what happened whenever he said something, and Hillary got a hold of it. This enforced scrutiny doesn't really help them any either, seeing as it usually helps enforce negative views about either Flake or the members trying to whistle blow from the DNC.
They are fighting a loosing battle at this point, and they are their own worst enemies.
You might want to go to this link and then scroll down to post #145
https://www.debatepolitics.com/poll...nfronting-trump-his-behavior-and-lies-15.html
Then come back and tell me about who is actually lying. CNN is reporting tonight that indictments have been issued today, and have been sealed by the Judge. We don't know who is going to be indicted yet or what the charges are-but they are coming probably on Monday or next week---but I suspect it's either Paul Manafort, Trump's campaign manager or Michael Flynn, Trump's national security adviser or both.
Exclusive: First charges filed in Mueller investigation - CNNPolitics
For more on this you can go to post # 187 on this page.
Are Republicans "complicit" as Jeff Flake stated for not confronting Trump on his behavior & lies?
:beatdeadhorse: If there is anything concrete that you disagree with (other than the picture of Christopher Steele, author of the Dossier file) in post # 163 on this thread. (INFORMATION) regarding the DOSSIER file of which I verified with credible--trusted linked sources then respond back to me with your own credible verified links. I think you're just simply parroting what you have heard from Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. If you can't do that, then you get put on ignore.
For other news regarding the Russian investigations -including Fox News video's with verifiable trusted links go to this link and scroll down to post # 145.
https://www.debatepolitics.com/poll...nfronting-trump-his-behavior-and-lies-15.html
I know just about as much as everyone else on this issue, thanks in part to it being locked away by the judge. But that it also one of the reasons plenty of us are remaining skeptical about all of this. They are going to try as hard as they can to dig their claws into either Flynn or Manafort, but due to their recent success rate in all of this, I am not going to hold my breath either.
Not to mention the fact that they will most likely try to stick this as hard as they can, with what little evidence they could possibly have, and given that track record as well. I am once again not going to hold my breath.
This is the same investigation committee that brought in the same man who was paid to basically create a smear dossier on Trump, that was completely unverified, and the DNC tried to run with it.
This committee, and their own supporters in the DNC, are their own worst enemies at this point. I can't say that I am not interested in this who thing, but I really don't have much to cause worry at this point.
No you really don't know a lot--all you've done is parrot Sean Hannity & Rush Limbaugh. You haven't provided a single link on your own.
Don't worry they'll be there to wipe your tears and help you blow your nose when these indictments are delivered--and they'll have a whole new conspiracy story you can feed off of at that time.
BTW the first to hire GPS Fusion was a republican right wing web site called Free Bacon.
Washington Free Beacon says it hired Fusion GPS during 2016 GOP primary | WPRV-AM
I think this is a very good question. Watch the entire 17 minute video FIRST--then comment and cast your vote. Are Senate & House Republicans complicit for not confronting Trump on his behavior and Lies?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent Responsibility to remove a sitting President who is regarded by many to be mentally unfit to hold this office?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is incapable of rising to the level of dignity & grace of the Presidency?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is not qualified nor competent to hold this office?
I think yes they do--which makes them "complicit."
Didn't watch the video yet but I have seen parts of it but my answer is yes of course. But this isn't just a republican by any means. I lean right and we are all guilty of stuff like this to a degree it just depends how much politicians are just worse at it and yes its a problem. Now right now it's a very highlighted issue because of Trump but I won't act like its a NEW ISSUE it got to this point because we let it. The blame lies with not only politicians but the people too. The reality is we are knocking at the door of many normal people being united regardless of your lean and the people that don't benefit from like that are losing their **** and the extremists are really panicking.
I think this is a very good question. Watch the entire 17 minute video FIRST--then comment and cast your vote. Are Senate & House Republicans complicit for not confronting Trump on his behavior and Lies?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent Responsibility to remove a sitting President who is regarded by many to be mentally unfit to hold this office?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is incapable of rising to the level of dignity & grace of the Presidency?
Don't Senate & House Republicans have an inherent responsibility to remove a President who is not qualified nor competent to hold this office?
I think yes they do--which makes them "complicit."
Independents are the majority voting block in this country today. Democrats come in second, and Republicans are 5 million behind them.
Over the years of being involved in politics--there really isn't a dime's difference between a Republican & a Democrat. They both want the same things, decent jobs, a good economy, good schools a strong military, etc. Their argument always comes from which direction to take to get from A to B.
This is why one of our forefathers, Hamilton did not want political parties. They often turn into more of a team sport, regardless of the consequences to this country. People will often times not vote for the best candidate--because there is an R or D behind their name. They will not support a good bill just because someone on the opposite side of isle presented it. This attitude is quickly taking down our country. The partisan infighting is ridiculous. When they refuse to work with one another and across the isle--government is not working.
Which is why I say: "Partisan politics often results in seeing the truth, knowing the truth, while still defending and promoting the lies."
Very good post.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?