You made the original claim that police should be given more weapons than ordinary citizens, the burden of proof is upon you.
Good to see you admit your bull**** has nothing to do with rights because those are legal matters. Ya know if you actually read the court case, you would see the assenting opinion digs into authors and writers of laws all through the 19th century and even dictionaries and they didnt agree with you. Funny how that works.
Evading my question means you've lost the debate.
They are different.
Person A tells person B that they support C and they believe D. It is right and proper for person B to demand that person A produce evidence that person B supports C and D.
That is what I have done. That is what I will continue to do.
In your case, you make claims of fact about certain things regrading police and weapons and the Second Amendment. You give us statements of what you claim are facts. It is then right and proper for anyone to challenge you to bring for the the verifiable evidence to support YOUR OWN CLAIMS.
In the first case, it is right and proper for me or anyone to do so.
In the second case, it is right and proper for me or anyone to do so.
Telling you what a dictionary definition is is not BS. It is simply reality.
By all means, do present that information for us.
More parsing to avoid being accountable.
Nah they arent. Its asking someone to reproduce what they said, re-introduce it into the conversation. Not wanting to or not being able to usually means parsing of words to avoid lying or being caught lying.
No. Go read Heller, show some intitiative, Im not spoon feeding anything else to you while you present nothing. Your habitual trolling ways are at an end with me. Im not indulging them any longer.
Matter of fact you are going on ignore for a while, because you have brought nothing to the table to substantiate anything you have said in the last month besides a dictionary and yahoo answers after being given reams of legal information. So Im giving myself a self imposed vacation from your idiocy.
I did read Heller. There is nothing in it which supports your claim about police and weapons. Nothing.
But if you claim that there is - as you have done up until this point - simply reproduce it directly from the Heller decision. Lets see it.
You putting me on ignore is your right as a member here. That is fine with me. This means I will not have to be subjected to your repeated and obsessive attacks without merit and that is a very good thing for myself as well as the other members here.
Wait, so now you are denying that, by law, we are all members of the militia?
Which is it, does the law say that we are members of the militia or not?
Well? Are we, or are we not? Every law ever written was... written. On paper. Laws against rape, murder, extortion, killing one's enemies with chlorine gas, etc. were written on paper. Are they a fiction in the real America we live in?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?