- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 13,156
- Reaction score
- 1,038
- Location
- melbourne florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
You mean opinions. I show sources I have not seen sources to contradict mine just more useless opinions
Look here sir.
Various posters have been displaying well-reasoned arguments this entire time, myself among them (I'd like to think, at least).
Have you ever examined those arguments and countered them with your own?
THAT is how you debate - so we've been debating you, whereas you appear to simply throw broken-record statements at us, or new links that ALSO fail to support your position.
How can you seriously be thinking you've won?
Everyone I can think of in this thread, outside yourself, has concluded that you are incorrect in the majority of your statements - and yet you continue to make those claims, without any indication that you have even considered glancing at our well-reasoned disagreements with your statements.
If you are unwilling to even consider alternates to your position, then how can you reasonably expect to expand your knowledge?
Or is it that you don't expect to?
Ahhhh, **** it.
What makes you think you are capable of understanding your sources?
You mean opinions. I show sources I have not seen sources to contradict mine just more useless opinions
ptif219.
You have given links and people have posted their objections to the content of and trustworthiness of those links. People have posted links and you have refused to respond to them in a substantial manner. Please try to put at least as much effort into understanding and responding to people's posts and their objections to your posts as they have to yours.
Although we certainly appreciate the well-meaning effort of respected members of the DP community to try to teach ptif the basic laws of logical thinking and debating, it came to a sad conclusion that ptif again and again proved that backwards evolution is possible and that apes descended from humans, as ptif the mighty debater showed himself as an example
Although we certainly appreciate the well-meaning effort of respected members of the DP community to try to teach ptif the basic laws of logical thinking and debating, it came to a sad conclusion that ptif again and again proved that backwards evolution is possible and that apes descended from humans, as ptif the mighty debater showed himself as an example
We did - you accused us of attacking sources.Their opinions mean nothing. Prove the sources wrong
We did - you accused us of attacking sources.
WTF is wrong with you?
We did - you accused us of attacking sources.
WTF is wrong with you?
No you gave opinions you showed no proof
He spent too much time driving in his truck, having delusions to help him off the boredom of his work.
posting links to websites that have no sources and no evidence, is not backing up your claims, my friend.
Just remember anytime you buy something a truck brought it. Without trucks America stops
There is no need to contradict your sources when those same sources don't support your opinion anyway.You mean opinions. I show sources I have not seen sources to contradict mine just more useless opinions
Proof of what?No you gave opinions you showed no proof
when you back-up a claim, you're SUPPOSED to do it with sites that have REAL information, that can be respect and trusted.
Proof of what?
There is no need to contradict your sources when those same sources don't support your opinion anyway.
You have yet to prove any of your claims and opinions as valid
This thread is ****ing hilarious. This is a totally illegal post, so go ahead and report it.
Pfit, I don't know whether to pity you, or to insult you, so I'll do both in the rudest manner I can think of right now, because your ignorance in the last few days has truly eclipsed all others. Really, you're like ****ing Badmutha, and Alfons put together, which is saying something.
Okay, pity time. I have this mental image of you as this senile old man hunched over the computer muttering cuss words to himself, and damning all of the left to hell or something. I feel bad, because I feel like you're so old and decrpit, you might die while posting something. Furthermore, you spend all your remaining time trying to "reason" with people and show them the "truth" and other stupid ****.
Now insult time. This is when I don't think of you as a person. Recently, you've been the most ****ing retarded piece of **** on this board, and should be put in a mental hospital for the unfiltered bull**** that comes out of your mouth. You've been the most hateful person on this board, and when I'm thinking of you in this manner, I wish no more than to beat the living **** out of you for insulting every aspect of America, from her freedoms, to her ideals.
In this thread alone, you've displayed retardation of such magnitude, I can't begin to describe how much you disgust me. If you believe you're still right, you just might be the most retarded person on this planet. I hope this post effects you in some way, and maybe you step back and look at everything that's happened in the past few days from an objective point of view.
So, in closing, just...stop. Your retardation is funny, but seriously, stop.
Several posters have examined the articles you presented as proof of your opinion regarding peer review.That my articles are false. They show peer review is broken. You gave opinions and claimed a source was low level which I guess means you think that makes it not credible.
No.Nice try but they do support my view that peer review is broken
Just remember anytime you buy something a truck brought it. Without trucks America stops
Several posters have examined the articles you presented as proof of your opinion regarding peer review.
They presented their analysis of those articles and their reasoning as to how those articles did not support your opinion on peer review.
You then dismissed that analysis and reasoning as an attack on your sources.
One has to ask how you can expect to be taken seriously if your own sources do not support your opinion to anyone's satisfaction except your own.
No.
They do not.
No evidence was presented that supports your position.
---------
However, if you are so sure of this, explain to us, in detail, how the articles you linked support your opinion.
Re-link those articles, with commentary from you to explain how they prove your opinion as valid.
Because to my knowledge, they do not, and I've read the majority of them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?