• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Antidepressants, pro or con?

ptsdkid

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
1,704
Reaction score
10
Location
New Hampshire
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Being a traumatized combat veteran, I had the choice as to accept prescribed antidepressant pills, or to find safer alternative means to coping with or relieving daily stress.

I have been in and out of therapy for 40 years, with half my clinicians suggesting I start a medical plan by intaking various quantities of Paxil, Wellbutrin, Zoloft, Prozac, Clonipin and Trazadone or Ambien for sleep disorders. The other half of my clinicians didn’t believe in prescribing anti depressants--they insisted I start a regimented physical therapy treatment plan free from drugs.

I opted for the natural physical fitness routine as means to alleviating stress. I do have chronic post traumatic stress disorder with an accent on high anxiety.

I’m not sure that the words ‘suffering from depression’ were ever written in my final medical analysis. I’ve never really ever felt depressed (no suicidal ideation)…extremely sad at times, but that is the limit.

I did try all of those aforementioned medicines while I was institutionalized as an inpatient at various Veteran’s Hospitals. I can’t even begin to describe the egregious side effects and insecurities I felt while taking those pills. Lets just say that the terms zombie, dissociate tendencies and excessive panic attacks came into play rather regularly.

At 56 years of age I still box three round fights with the over 55 crowd at a local gym, and I run in numerous 5&10K road races. Sure, I still have my shaky moments, but they almost always come as a result of idle time dwelling on the negative aspects of my condition, or on the detriment that liberalism has on our country.

I sure would like to hear from someone (with perhaps a personal history) that would sing the praises of the usage of anti depressants. Always like to get the opposite viewpoint to any issue. Think of antidepressant usage as being a political topic. Then we could open it up with a healthy or an unhealthy debate, depending on your addictive mindset to taking drugs, or not.
 
Although I don't have personal experience with them, there was an article in the Economist that showed with the rise in sales of antidepressants, suicide rate has lowered by 2-3 per 100,000, age adjusted.
 
Synch said:
Although I don't have personal experience with them, there was an article in the Economist that showed with the rise in sales of antidepressants, suicide rate has lowered by 2-3 per 100,000, age adjusted.


***That is interesting if true. There were no less than 6 suicides during my lengthy stay at the VA hospital at West haven, Connecticut about 14 years ago. All six died from an overdose of 'prescribed' anti depressants, etc.
 
dwelling on the negative aspects of my condition, or on the detriment that liberalism has on our country.

I have long thought that people expressing sentiment such as the sentiment above in quotes were the signs of a sick mind. There are a couple others lurking about here on this site. You are not alone. (Yeah, you know the ones.)

At least this one admits he is mentally challenged. That takes honsety and courage. A character trait, that is lacking in few others I also have in mind. I just didn't realize how mentally challenged he really was.

I will have to give this guy a pass. I always yield the right-of-way to the short bus.

Further, I will turn inward towards my human compassion and try to have more patience with the other "challenged" likeminded people on this site.

"But for the grace of god go I."
 
Last edited:
In about ten or so years...once the Mass Clinical Trials have run their cources....we will have a better Idea of the long term effects of rewiring the brain through chemical manipulation. I do not look forward to an entire generation of Ridalin dependant adults holding positions of power in twenty years.
 

Could it be any worse than the coke heads and drunks in charge now?:mrgreen:
 
 
ptsdkid said:
***Where is it that I admitted to being mentally challenged. I do admit that I wish for you liberals to mentally challenge me into debate, but so far you've all come up a bit short.

Oh....Gimme a break Kid....every single time someone (liberal or otherwise) attempts to debate you, you run away like a schoolgirl. I have come to understand it is simply that you Have No Idea what debate actually consists of.....perhaps a lesson is in order?

Lemme know, I will happily give you a few tips, think of it as On the Job Training. Tortured Debate seems a Viable Venue....if you have interest.
 


***Run away from debate....hardly! Debating liberals that haven no facts to bolster their side is better left for someone prone to child's play. May I suggest you look toward the teach---king of the basement dwellers. LOL!
 
ptsdkid said:
I’m not sure that the words ‘suffering from depression’ were ever written in my final medical analysis. I’ve never really ever felt depressed (no suicidal ideation)…extremely sad at times, but that is the limit.

.

And there's the rub. You didn't need anti-depressants because you were never depressed. What you make the mistake of doing is trying to assert that because they weren't for you, they're bad for everybody. Worse this I" got healthy with hard physical exercise so anybody can do it" attitude rather makes me reach for the sick bowl.

I have been fortunate enough to never suffer from depression, but those who do can see a future so black they just don't know where to turn. The lifting of depression by medication can give people the oomph to change the things in their lives that were making them depressed in the first place. And of course in endogenous depression, well there is no external cause, so lifting it with medication can only be good. For what it's worth I do think anti-depressants are over prescribed in health systems where doctors don't have enough time to actually talk to their patients, and in health systems where prescribing makes money, and that needs closer inspection, but in the majority of cases of genuine clinical depression, they are a very useful tool - one to be used with caution, but one whose positive effects are to be valued. And we must never forget that each individual case is to be taken on its own merits: one man's medicine is another man's poison.

Your comment about liberals is irrelevant and debases what was a very valid question. I am not a liberal, before you start.
 
ptsdkid said:
***Run away from debate....hardly! Debating liberals that haven no facts to bolster their side is better left for someone prone to child's play. May I suggest you look toward the teach---king of the basement dwellers. LOL!


I rest My Case.....As you seem to think ALL liberals lack the ability to use factual information, would that not mean you wont debate one? This is...running away.

I have just given you the best opportunity you will get, to debate someone you claim is Liberal, who uses scientific evaluation for the majority of debate....these are generally accepted as fact. I also tend to qualify non factual Data with a statement proclaiming it is but my opinion. If you truly wish to Debate a Liberal, (which you regularly call me), who has an ability to use established fact for argument, the offer is wide open.

You will of course......run away from this as well.
 
***Where is it that I admitted to being mentally challenged. I do admit that I wish for you liberals to mentally challenge me into debate, but so far you've all come up a bit short.

You really are touched aren't you?

Being a traumatized combat veteran, I had the choice as to accept prescribed antidepressant pills,

I have been in and out of therapy for 40 years, with half my clinicians suggesting I start a medical plan by intaking various quantities of Paxil, Wellbutrin, Zoloft, Prozac, Clonipin and Trazadone or Ambien for sleep disorders.

during my lengthy stay at the VA hospital at West haven, Connecticut about 14 years ago.

And that was just from yesterday.........:roll:

If I were you, I would be more concerned about your own mental illness than I would those twisted liberals hiding under your bed.....
 
Last edited:
 

***I always assumed that with this being a debate politics forum--that I needed to bring politics into every one of my postings. You see, I believe there is a level of politics in everything we do as humans. I'll have you know that I had a close relationship with each and everyone of my therapists over the years. I knew about their families and I knew about their political persuasions. Every therapist that had prescribed dangerous drugs to me were without exception political liberals. Now I could go into detail as to why these liberals had prescribed drugs, and counter their practice by telling you why it was that every Conservative clinician prescribed natural therapies like CBT (Cognitive-Behaviorial Therapy), Systematic Desensitation, Exposure and Response treatment, Modeling Treatment, EMDR, Biofeedback, Breathing Retraining, Relaxation Techniques, Acupuncture, Physchotherapy, Psychodrama, et, etc etc....but I won't bother to burden you with the facts and political reasons until I see that you are ready for further debate. Like I said to brother Tecoya---ball is in your court....Love 30.
 

Please....begin:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/lovers-quarrel/12793-tortured-debate-ptsdkid-vs-tecoyah.html
 
Might we assume you decided NOT to take your meds ptsdkid? :roll:

I certainly appears so. :shock:
 
Captain America said:
Might we assume you decided NOT to take your meds ptsdkid? :roll:

I certainly appears so. :shock:


***Assume what you like Captain, but since I deal in facts and reality--I'll leave it to you to decide whether I was telling the truth when I said I loathe the taking of dangerous drugs. I'll leave it to you to reread my original post stating that I box and jog regularly. That doesn't quite sound like someone dabbling in drug usage. You may not ever find a more clear and intelligent working mind, then you'll encounter when reading my posts. That's another fact, Jack!....LOL! Sow me what you got.
 

Have you ever seen that movie Slingblade? That character played by Billy Bob Thornton was as strong as an ox too now that you mention it.

Brother, I just asked because I am very concerned about your mental health. Calm down. Have yourself a nice warm enema.
 
I require some clarification on this claim:

Quote:
I have been in and out of therapy for 40 years, with half my clinicians suggesting I start a medical plan by intaking various quantities of Paxil, Wellbutrin, Zoloft, Prozac, Clonipin and Trazadone or Ambien for sleep disorders.

The only medications you listed that existed 40 years ago are Clonipin and Trazadone. Prozac, the third generation of antidepressants, wasn't introduced until that late 80's. The remainder followed from that, except Ambien of course which is irrelevant to the class of AD drugs.

Forty freaking years ago, the VA wasn't even recognizing the diagnosis of PTSD for our Vietnam vets. I smell bull excrement. :roll:

Why should I have expected otherwise?
 


****You shouldn't have expected otherwise. The word 'student' under your name suggests that you're still in the learning process; a greenhorn if you will.

I began my therapy 40 years ago. No where did I say there were those types of anti depressants back in the sixties. My lengthy VA hospital stays were done in the nineties where I was introduced to the drugs in question. Starting to get the picture, rookie? As far as I can tell, trauma and it's associated diagnosis of stress related conditions have been around since the beginning of mankind.
 
You know, ptsdkid, when I read your OP, I was certainly encouraged, as not only did it seem like it wasn't one of your typical 'I hate liberals, I hate Jews, I'm always right, I'm close-minded and refuse to listen to anything other than what is in my own little mind', but it seemed like an honest, information-gathering question that not only you related to quite articulately, but one that I have had a lot of experience with and therfore one that I wanted to discuss. Unfortunely, you fed right into the bait that brought back to your typical posting style. I will try to bring it back to your orignal question, which I think is a good one.

I have worked in the metal health field for more than 16 years, and have seen people on all of the medications you mentioned. In general, though not universally, I have seen them be amazingly effective with severe depression, but only in conjunction with therapy. Research shows that the most effective way to combat severe mood disorders is through a combination of psychiatric medication and therapy. It works better than either one alone. Note though, I said severe depression. Alhtough utilized for more moderate forms of the illness (and effective, too), many in the mental health community prefer to see clients who's disorders are not so severe, try to manage in therapy alone, before trying a medication. My opinion would be similar to that. There is certain symptomology that one would have to exhibit for me to believe that medication was the way to go. My brother became very depressed after my mother passed away. He was crying all day, couldn't work, didn't sleep, didn't leave the house, and stopped all activities he used to enjoy. His depression was severe and his therapist recommended he see a psychiatrist, whom prescribed Paxil. He is doing much better; has a job, goes out, is involved in activities, and reports feeling better. It was the combination of both the meds and therapy that have helped him, but the meds raised his mood enough to allow the therapy to work.


Interesting. Again, having worked in the field for more than 16 years, and having dealt with scores of therapists and psychiatrists, gotten to know many of them personally (some are a few of my best friends), I have found EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE TRUE. It is the liberals that tend to either under prescribe or use more 'alternative' proceedures. If you think about it this makes perfect sense, as it is often one with a more liberal view that will do something more alternative, 'natural', or different. It is more the conservative mental health professionals that I know, that tend to be, what I call 'medicine men'. They give you a prescription after spending 10 minutes with you. I am speaking in generalities, as there are some conservatives and liberals that do approach medication in the opposite way I've mentioned. But the majority, don't.

Also, therapists don't prescribe medication (though they can recommend a psychiatric consult), pschiatrist do. The 'natural' therapies you mentioned aren't really that. They are forms of psychotherapy that therapists practice. They are often used in conjunction with medication, though they can (and often are) used without.

As far as your assertion that physical exercise can be helpful to someone's mood disorder, I completely agree. If someone has a severe mood disorder, however, it would be inappropriate and unethical to recommend just that. Does that person definitely need medication. Everyone is different, so there isn't a definative answer, but some combination of treatments would be indicated, and medication might be one. I certainly applaude your efforts to overcome your disorder.
 

****Physical exercise for me came well after I had completed my natural therapy program (s). I suppose you could say that I still exercise in conjucture with various forms of natural therapy--but I do this all on my own now. I refuse to use the VA system as a form of babysitting service on an outpatient basis. My lengthy stays in those hospitals gave me the feeling of being in prison or being hopelessly institutionalized. I wouldn't even wish that type of living for a liberal.
 
Captain, by virtue of your post count, you like I have been deemed irrelevant to this discussion. I was a psychologist as well. Little did I know the importance of post count. :rofl
 
Dont feel too bad Guys...I have a respectable post count and the Widdow Kid wont even give me the time of day.......Wonder why?

"
I rest My Case.....As you seem to think ALL liberals lack the ability to use factual information, would that not mean you wont debate one? This is...running away.

I have just given you the best opportunity you will get, to debate someone you claim is Liberal, who uses scientific evaluation for the majority of debate....these are generally accepted as fact. I also tend to qualify non factual Data with a statement proclaiming it is but my opinion. If you truly wish to Debate a Liberal, (which you regularly call me), who has an ability to use established fact for argument, the offer is wide open.


You will of course......run away from this as well
."
 
Because it would appear he's either very bad at math or a really bad con artist.
He states he's 56. That would be a birth year of 1950.
He states he started his therapy 40 years ago. That would make him 16.
The army/military service doesn't take 16 year olds.

That ain't apple pie I smell....
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…