Pacridge
DP Veteran
You don't favor freedom of the press?vauge said:These type of stories should never hit the public news.
vauge said:Yes, but I also believe in responsibility of the press. Some things need to be addressed in private by the military.
Al gurab(sp) prison in Iraq - case and point.
It shouldn't be. There is nothing wrong with keeping your mouth shut sometimes.Isn't responsability of the press an oxymoron?
Tetsuo said:A proper press needs to not be owned by a company as companies have an agenda, also it needs not to be owned by the government as it will be used for propaganda. It needs to be owned by the people...
Corperate radion blows and from what I've heard about the BBC, government radio wouldn't be much better.I do not doubt that CNN has as much bias or coercion in its broadcasts than Fox (apart from maybe the election scandal considering the personnel on the news desk) and I agree with your point 100% but if you were to ask me how much I would pay for a news service I would point out to you that the BBC is paid for by the people of Britain via a license that all have to pay if they own a television. The license fee is in BGP £119 so if you ask how much I would pay the answer if roughly $226.
IronTongue said:I have a problem with forcing people to pay for a license just to buy a T.V. What if I just wanted to play video games, or what if I really don't want the news at all?
Huh? Did I miss something?Tetsuo said:I don't know for sure but I was told that if you have no ariel going in to your house for TV and no ariels in the house then a TV can be counted as a monitor. The BBC as well as being a news network also is an entertainment network so if you dont watch the news you will watch the other programmes I guess.
The here in the US is certainly slanted. But it depends on which network you watch as to what slant you get. Though under the Bush regime they been real effective at cutting off press that disagrees with their position. Here just recently they cut off a newspaper in Colorado that ran a piece about soldiers being treated unfairly by the National Guard's health care system. That paper was immediately removed from having access to the base and was no longer "invited" to press conferences. Several reporters have noted that if they report anything neg. about the President and or the Adiminstration they're removed from having access to the White House briefings. Of course most of this has been quiet because if they make too much noise they loose their access. No access, no reports, no job. And trust me now is not a good time to be loosing your job.Tetsuo said:My bad, anyway back to the point.
Mine was that despite the US having a genuine freedom of press all of the media channels that news comes down are controlled by large companies that have agendas and so freedom of press does not ensure relevant, unbiased commentary.
Also that in my own humble opinnion the BBC is the best newsnetwork in the world.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?