• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Another Stonehenge Discovered Under Lake Michigan?

danarhea

Slayer of the DP Newsbot
DP Veteran
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
43,602
Reaction score
26,257
Location
Houston, TX
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Scientists, using Sonar to search for signs of shipwrecks at the bottom of Lake Michigan, found something else:

sonarmichiganstonehenge.jpg


Is this a freak of nature, or did humans place those stones 10,000 years ago, when the lake bed was dry? Researchers intend to find out.

Article is here.
 
Neat.

The stones look kind of randomly arranged, at least according to that picture. But who knows? Certainly not impossible that it's human-designed.

EDIT: Oh I saw the Mastodon-y carving in the associated press article. Interesting. Maybe it's a neanderthal's tribute to critically-acclaimed metal outfit Mastodon:

YouTube - Mastodon - "Iron Tusk"
 
Last edited:
It looks like the top view of a sunken buoy in the middle.
 
Scientists, using Sonar to search for signs of shipwrecks at the bottom of Lake Michigan, found something else:

sonarmichiganstonehenge.jpg


Is this a freak of nature, or did humans place those stones 10,000 years ago, when the lake bed was dry? Researchers intend to find out.

Article is here.
Appears to be random to me. What is the area size of the sample? The size of the rocks? Do neighboring areas display the same topography or are they barren? All critical questions.
 
Appears to be random to me. What is the area size of the sample? The size of the rocks? Do neighboring areas display the same topography or are they barren? All critical questions.

What an UGLY sonar pic. Call the navy to sweep it with some quality side scan sonar!
 
Appears to be random to me. What is the area size of the sample? The size of the rocks? Do neighboring areas display the same topography or are they barren? All critical questions.

These are good questions. I would only add that I would like to see these from the side. Are they standing on end, and how tall are they?
 
I will get on it. I hope they can spare some man-power.

Call up HM15 and ask them for a few sweeps with the AQS-14 Fish. I used to do bottom mapping using that sonar, let me tell ya what.. we'd know what those were in two passes.
 
Call up HM15 and ask them for a few sweeps with the AQS-14 Fish. I used to do bottom mapping using that sonar, let me tell ya what.. we'd know what those were in two passes.


Then I'll relieve my self of operational commander and you can do this.
 
Back
Top Bottom