aquapub
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2005
- Messages
- 7,317
- Reaction score
- 344
- Location
- America (A.K.A., a red state)
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Hillary recently earned her DNC merit badge for race-baiting when she spoke to a group of black activists and fueled their paranoid bigotry by likening the U.S. House of Representatives to a plantation.
Now, she has earned her merit badge for flip-flopping on foreign policy. Demonstrating why the Democrat party is so 2 dimensional and unable to win elections anymore, Hillary asserted what was politically convenient THIS week with total disregard for consistency, substance, or validity.
After voting for the liberation of Iraq and then criticizing President Bush for acting "unilaterally," she now has found a problem with him relying on the international community and diplomacy to deal with Iran. He can do no right with Democrats. She has changed her tune because the world is starting to see that Bush is right about the impotence of our European "allies" and about history proving that appeasement never works. Hillary follows the argument that's winning TODAY, even if it requires blatantly contradicting herself.
(of course, the difference between Iraq and Iran is that Iraq already had a decade of failed diplomacy. Bush is keeping to his stated principle of trying diplomacy first, then resorting to war-his actions in both situations have been exactly right.)
John Kerry was so proud to watch her blossom into a fully self-contradicting Democrat that he actually shed a tear. Democrats forgo the annoyance of coming up with ideas or philosophies and place their priorities on getting themselves power, even if it means standing for contradicting things.
Hillary's systematic reinvention of her image as some kind of hawk on national security is to make up for her total lack of presidential credentials and her disturbingly fanatical liberal track record.
Now, she has earned her merit badge for flip-flopping on foreign policy. Demonstrating why the Democrat party is so 2 dimensional and unable to win elections anymore, Hillary asserted what was politically convenient THIS week with total disregard for consistency, substance, or validity.
After voting for the liberation of Iraq and then criticizing President Bush for acting "unilaterally," she now has found a problem with him relying on the international community and diplomacy to deal with Iran. He can do no right with Democrats. She has changed her tune because the world is starting to see that Bush is right about the impotence of our European "allies" and about history proving that appeasement never works. Hillary follows the argument that's winning TODAY, even if it requires blatantly contradicting herself.
(of course, the difference between Iraq and Iran is that Iraq already had a decade of failed diplomacy. Bush is keeping to his stated principle of trying diplomacy first, then resorting to war-his actions in both situations have been exactly right.)
John Kerry was so proud to watch her blossom into a fully self-contradicting Democrat that he actually shed a tear. Democrats forgo the annoyance of coming up with ideas or philosophies and place their priorities on getting themselves power, even if it means standing for contradicting things.
Hillary's systematic reinvention of her image as some kind of hawk on national security is to make up for her total lack of presidential credentials and her disturbingly fanatical liberal track record.