• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Anger as US state passes bill to criminalise political memes, offenders risk jail term (1 Viewer)

ColdHardTruth

SN/YN US NAVY
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2022
Messages
23,300
Reaction score
20,546
Location
Colorado
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

Anger as US state passes bill to criminalise political memes, offenders risk jail term​


The Texas House of Representatives has passed a bill aimed at criminalizing political memes.

The bill, HB 366, would imprison offenders for a minimum of one year if the meme does not have a government-approved disclaimer.

The bill was sponsored by the lawmaker representing District 21 and former Speaker of the House, McDade Phela.


This is an OBVIOUS first amendment violation. It will NEVER make through the process. It is a clear message that the republiscum in Tex-ass is out of control and in need of removal.



 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED​
AN ACT relating to required disclosures on certain political advertising that contains altered media; creating a criminal offense.​
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:​
SECTION 1. Chapter 255, Election Code, is amended by adding​
Section 255.0015 to read as follows:​
Sec. 255.0015. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE ON CERTAIN POLITICAL​
ADVERTISING CONTAINING ALTERED MEDIA; CRIMINAL PENALTY.​
(a) This section applies only to a person who:​
(1) is an officeholder, candidate, or political committee;​
(2) makes expenditures during a reporting period that in the aggregate exceed $100 for political advertising, other than an expense to cover the basic cost of hardware, messaging software, and bandwidth; or​
(3) publishes, distributes, or broadcasts political advertising described by Subsection (b) in return for consideration.​
(b) A person may not, with the intent to influence an election, knowingly cause to be published, distributed, or broadcast political advertising that includes an image, audio recording, or video recording of an officeholder's or candidate's appearance, speech, or conduct that did not occur in reality, including an image, audio recording, or video recording that has been altered using generative artificial intelligence technology, unless the political advertising includes a disclosure from the person or another person on whose behalf the political advertising is published, distributed, or broadcast indicating that the image, audio recording, or video recording did not occur in reality.​
(c) The commission by rule shall prescribe the form of the disclosure required by Subsection (b), including the font, size, and color of the disclosure. The commission shall ensure that the form of the disclosure is consistent with other required disclosures on political advertising.​
(d) A person commits an offense if the person violates this section. An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.​
(e) This section does not impose liability on any of the following persons for political advertising published, distributed, or broadcast by or at the direction of another person:​
(1) an interactive computer service, as defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 230(f);​
(2) an Internet service provider, cloud service provider, cybersecurity service provider, communication service provider, or telecommunications network;​
(3) a radio or television broadcaster, including a cable or satellite television network operator, programmer, or producer; or​
(4) the owner or operator of a commercial sign, as defined by Section 391.001, Transportation Code.​
SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.​



ELECTION CODE
TITLE 15. REGULATING POLITICAL FUNDS AND CAMPAIGNS
CHAPTER 255. REGULATING POLITICAL ADVERTISING AND CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATIONS
 
I do not see how this would survive challenge on Constitutional grounds.
It’s essentially a prohibition on creating deepfakes to influence an election. It would absolutely survive a challenge on Constitutional grounds.
 
Better start getting them out of my system.


9shcon.jpg
 

Anger as US state passes bill to criminalise political memes, offenders risk jail term​


The Texas House of Representatives has passed a bill aimed at criminalizing political memes.

The bill, HB 366, would imprison offenders for a minimum of one year if the meme does not have a government-approved disclaimer.

The bill was sponsored by the lawmaker representing District 21 and former Speaker of the House, McDade Phela.


This is an OBVIOUS first amendment violation. It will NEVER make through the process. It is a clear message that the republiscum in Tex-ass is out of control and in need of removal.




If it's the Left who can't meme, why pass this clearly unconstitutional bill? Seems that the Right should have more worries here.
 
It's part of Bannon's flood the zone with bullshit plan.


Flood the zone with BS in the knowledge that most will be caught and rejected but also with the hope the gatekeepers will be so overwhelmed that some of the BS gets through.

Also could be part of the rabid right-wing GOP's campaign to normalize outrageous, un-American policies.
 
Having read the text of the bill, it is requiring a disclaimer if the content contains information or depictions that the publisher knows to be false.
 
I’ll give you an example.

We're not talking about fraud.

We're talking about AI type memes. How are they unlawful?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom