What, specifically, did you find to be biased or inaccurate in that article?I don’t doubt that Trump would kiss Putin’s ass in the middle of Red Square but my lord that article is the biggest piece of shit I’ve ever read. CNN isn’t even pretending to be objective anymore. They’re just as bad as Fox.
Really? Are they?I don’t doubt that Trump would kiss Putin’s ass in the middle of Red Square but my lord that article is the biggest piece of shit I’ve ever read. CNN isn’t even pretending to be objective anymore. They’re just as bad as Fox.
Any time Biden is criticized for being weak with Russia it's good to remember this quote:So R's are going to have to figure out how to play this. Criticize Biden for being a weakling (i.e. we should commit 200k American troops and bomb the Russians back to the middle ages) or call him a fool for not rolling over and playing dead thus, giving Putin anything and everything he wants.
Biden is certainly making this difficult for R's by actually showing great statesmanship, getting world consensus and support while keeping the door to diplomacy wide open.
Either option available to the R's is not a terribly attractive look.
Trump sides with Putin as Biden tries to stop a war
Analysis: Trump sides with Putin as Biden tries to stop a war
It took only 24 hours for Donald Trump to hail Russian President Vladimir Putin's dismembering of independent, democratic, sovereign Ukraine as an act of "genius."www.cnn.com
Blah, blah, blah (in my best Greta Thunberg voice). So I take it that your approach would be to do nothing and appease the terrorist.Russia formalises what has been the reality since 2014 and the Dumbos squeal like stuck pigs .
Already the US is effectively in the midst of trying to organise what is really a False Flag and once again is being humiliated .
In fairness , The Dementia Kid and a bunch of backing Neocons are hardly great opposition to overcome .
The US is now trying to organise sanctions which they cannot effectively do without hurting the EU and then later
finding that any residual good will from Davros buddies has fast disappeared .
That's my point. It's not reportage. It's not even analysis. It's cheerleading for Biden and demonization of Trump (which he deserves but NOT from the media)Really? Are they?
Unlike the precipitous, but insidious slant that often comes from FOX "News", this CNN article doesn't even pretend to be reportage. In fact, it's labeled "Analysis" right there on the by line! It's actually telling you it's just one man's opinion, immediately under the headline.
Unlike FOX, CNN doesn't blur the line between News, and Op/Ed.
It's not inaccurate. It's written like a bad piece of fiction or an advertisement for Biden and not worthy of a news organization.What, specifically, did you find to be biased or inaccurate in that article?
So R's are going to have to figure out how to play this. Criticize Biden for being a weakling (i.e. we should commit 200k American troops and bomb the Russians back to the middle ages) or call him a fool for not rolling over and playing dead thus, giving Putin anything and everything he wants.
Biden is certainly making this difficult for R's by actually showing great statesmanship, getting world consensus and support while keeping the door to diplomacy wide open.
Either option available to the R's is not a terribly attractive look.
Trump sides with Putin as Biden tries to stop a war
Analysis: Trump sides with Putin as Biden tries to stop a war
It took only 24 hours for Donald Trump to hail Russian President Vladimir Putin's dismembering of independent, democratic, sovereign Ukraine as an act of "genius."www.cnn.com
Any "analysis" is just one person's opinion. The analyzer's. This wasn't proffered as some sort of scholarly work product from the history department of a university. We'll have more than enough of that to look forward to - if we live long enough.That's my point. It's not reportage. It's not even analysis. It's cheerleading for Biden and demonization of Trump (which he deserves but NOT from the media)
And I've never equated analysis with Op/Ed. I would never confuse and piece I've read that was labelled in the NYT's - for example - with an Op/Ed-
Never underestimate your enemy. Biden did just that while Trump recognizes the fact that in this geopolitical chess game Putin is a very experienced grand master.So R's are going to have to figure out how to play this. Criticize Biden for being a weakling (i.e. we should commit 200k American troops and bomb the Russians back to the middle ages) or call him a fool for not rolling over and playing dead thus, giving Putin anything and everything he wants.
Biden is certainly making this difficult for R's by actually showing great statesmanship, getting world consensus and support while keeping the door to diplomacy wide open.
Either option available to the R's is not a terribly attractive look.
Trump sides with Putin as Biden tries to stop a war
Analysis: Trump sides with Putin as Biden tries to stop a war
It took only 24 hours for Donald Trump to hail Russian President Vladimir Putin's dismembering of independent, democratic, sovereign Ukraine as an act of "genius."www.cnn.com
Never underestimate your enemy. Biden did just that while Trump recognizes the fact that in this geopolitical chess game Putin is a very experienced grand master.
Trump stopped the pipeline construction that Biden immediately approved so your talking point is spouted from a mouth with no teeth.And Trump countered Russia by doing what? Giving them everything they wanted and never standing up to them?
Trump stopped the pipeline construction that Biden immediately approved so your talking point is spouted from a mouth with no teeth.
I agree with the content. What I disagree with is the presentation and the use of adjectives that are more suited to works of fiction.Any "analysis" is just one person's opinion. The analyzer's. This wasn't proffered as some sort of scholarly work product from the history department of a university. We'll have more than enough of that to look forward to - if we live long enough.
But I can't help but question the fact that your criticism comes without actually challenging any specifics in the content. How do you like this paragraph?
"I knew that he always wanted Ukraine. I used to talk to him about it. I said, 'You can't do it. You're not going to do it.' But I could see that he wanted it," the former President said. In reality, Trump suggested during his 2016 campaign that Russia could keep Crimea, another Ukrainian territory which Putin had annexed in 2014. "The people of Crimea, from what I've heard, would rather be with Russia than where they were," Trump said, parroting a Kremlin talking point.
Trump's direct quotes would seem to be making the author's point for him.
That was annexed under Obama BidenTrump also ended sanctions against Russia over Crimea and legally recognized their ownership over the illegally annexed territory.
That was annexed under Obama Biden
Complete BS. Rachel tell you that?Trump responded by legally recognizing Crimea as Russian territory
Complete BS. Rachel tell you that?
U.S. won't recognize Crimea annexation: security official
The United States will not recognize the annexation of Crimea by Russia if residents of the region vote to leave Ukraine in a referendum next week, U.S. national security official Tony Blinken said on Sunday.mobile.reuters.com
Trump administration rolls out new sanctions over Russian occupation of Crimea
The Trump administration on Wednesday announced new sanctions related to Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.The Treasury Department designated eight individuals in Ukraine in respon…thehill.com
From 2020You realize your first link is from 2014 right? Trump reversed the US’s position in 2018.
From 2020
Trump administration rolls out new sanctions over Russian occupation of Crimea
The Trump administration on Wednesday announced new sanctions related to Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.The Treasury Department designated eight individuals in Ukraine in respon…thehill.com
Feel free to post your citation where Trump Legally recognized Crimea as Russia as you earlier claimed.I know he talked about it as part of a Syrian compromise but don’t think it actually came to fruition.After how much criticism for his inaction?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?