• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Americans calling for the Genocide of Americans

Do you tolerate Americans calling for the genocide of Americans

  • Americans should tolerate politicians calling for genocide of Americans—but no real genocide

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am unable to tell if calls for genocide are tolerable

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    15

Simon W. Moon

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
34,990
Reaction score
19,759
Political Leaning
Conservative
How normal should promoting American genocide be in American politics?

Is this something you want to be an everyday thing?

Or is this something which is intolerable?
 
I find this poll perplexing. Are you speaking of Americans as a race, and the genocide of that entire race? Or do you mean the genocide of specific races? And is that one of the weird international-debating-chamber definitions of genocide, like convincing people to speak a different language, or the narrower vernacular sense? (Some definitions of "promoting genocide" can be rather extraordinary)

Also, not sure what you mean by "tolerate". Assuming reasonable answers to the previous paragraph, I might "tolerate" a politician in the sense of not sending him to JAIL for making such an agenda, but he's put himself right out of the ballot contention as far as I'm concerned.
 
How normal should promoting American genocide be in American politics?

Is this something you want to be an everyday thing?

Or is this something which is intolerable?

Americans calling for the Genocide of Americans​


Can you tell me who these Americans are...the one's calling for genocide?
 

Americans calling for the Genocide of Americans​


Can you tell me who these Americans are...the one's calling for genocide?

why?
Does the identity of the person make a difference​
as to whether or not calling for the genocide of Americans is tolerable?​
Is it tolerable for some politicians to call for the genocide of Americans but not others?



.
 
I find this poll perplexing. Are you speaking of Americans as a race, and the genocide of that entire race? Or do you mean the genocide of specific races?

How much do the answer to these questions matter to you poll response?

Would certain answers cause you to change your response?

The humans in question are Americans. imho, the rest seems arbitrary.


And is that one of the weird international-debating-chamber definitions of genocide, like convincing people to speak a different language, or the narrower vernacular sense? (Some definitions of "promoting genocide" can be rather extraordinary)

killing Americans dead


Also, not sure what you mean by "tolerate". Assuming reasonable answers to the previous paragraph, I might "tolerate" a politician in the sense of not sending him to JAIL for making such an agenda, but he's put himself right out of the ballot contention as far as I'm concerned.

allowing the politician to continue in public life as a politician
 

Americans calling for the Genocide of Americans​


Can you tell me who these Americans are...the one's calling for genocide?

I certainly support Laura Loomer calling for the 65 million Mexicans currently occupying our country being fed to alligators whom, I should remind everyone, Trump called drug dealers, criminals and rapists.

MAGA.
 
What isn't "genocide" these days...

No idea what you're talking about.


Are there some definitions of genocide which would be tolerable for a politician to use when calling for the genocide of Americans?

If so, which ones?

If not, then what does it matter?
 
allowing the politician to continue in public life as a politician
Given that you're not calling for legal censorship, and are using genocide in the narrow sense, then it needs to be #1. My first question is relevant insomuch that an American calling for all Americans to die is probably just trying to reconcile himself to the potential consequences of appointing Robert F. Kennedy as an "expert", rather than a serious practitioner of racial hatred.
 
the number of people who are treating this as a gotcha question is darkly hilarious but deeply disheartening
Why shouldn't we? There's a cottage industry of trying to portray people as genocidaires because they use an innocuous slogan or show still art with some fruit. The kind of industry that can DESTROY HARVARD, America's best-known university! So yeah, people expect a trick. Will probably get one.
 
How normal should promoting American genocide be in American politics?

Is this something you want to be an everyday thing?

Or is this something which is intolerable?
Is this a hypothetical question or is this something a politician has called for?
 
.



the number of people who are treating this as a gotcha question​
is darkly hilarious but deeply disheartening​



.
How could this possibly be a "gotcha" question?
 
Is this a hypothetical question or is this something a politician has called for?
Loomer....twice. (you know, the nice lady VERY close to the rapey felon.
 
Why shouldn't we? There's a cottage industry of trying to portray people as genocidaires because they use an innocuous slogan or show still art with some fruit. The kind of industry that can DESTROY HARVARD, America's best-known university! So yeah, people expect a trick. Will probably get one.
I don't see Harvard being destroyed, (maybe destroying itself from within) but yes Harvard turning a blind eye to its students for targeting Jews.
 
why?
Does the identity of the person make a difference​
as to whether or not calling for the genocide of Americans is tolerable?​
Is it tolerable for some politicians to call for the genocide of Americans but not others?



.
Why?

Are there really Americans calling for genocide of Americans?
 
I certainly support Laura Loomer calling for the 65 million Mexicans currently occupying our country being fed to alligators whom, I should remind everyone, Trump called drug dealers, criminals and rapists.

MAGA.

Instead of arresting the violent M-13 illegals as he promised, Trump's ICE is detaining farm workers, restaurant busboys, school children, etc.

Trump's Beautiful Cruel Bill adds $45 billion to the national debt for new ICE detention centers. 116,000 beds. (contracts to be awarded to GOP connected prison/correction corporations such as Core Civic and the GEO Group)

ICE will become the largest law enforcement organization (LEO) in the US, with an annual budget larger than that of the Israel Defense Forces. The largest, and with the least guardrails and Congressional oversight.

$46.5 billion to finish Trump's border wall (yes, the border wall that Trump promised Mexico was going to pay for, remember?)

All of this new Republican deficit-spending ($3.5 trillion) is being put on your grandchildren's tab.

NOT MAGA
 
I certainly support Laura Loomer calling for the 65 million Mexicans currently occupying our country being fed to alligators whom, I should remind everyone, Trump called drug dealers, criminals and rapists.

MAGA.

The alligators are drug dealers, rapists and murderers?
That's rather unfair to paint all alligators in such a negative way as I'm sure many are fine animals.
 
Is this a hypothetical question or is this something a politician has called for?

Laura Loomer suggested that all the Latinos in the US should be fed to alligators.

I hear that it is meant as a joke, since the logistics of feeding 65 million Latinos to 5 million alligators would be quite challenging. Nonetheless, the joke-threat of genocide against Latinos was in very poor taste in my opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom