• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Almost 40% Of World Bank's Recent Climate Funds Unaccounted For

Facts, ethics, logic, and the over all effect of leaving any sign of these lacking from decisions on leadership.
You looked in the mirror again. Keep it up.
 
You looked in the mirror again. Keep it up.

If you truly think Trump is an ethical, logical, decision on leadership when all the facts (and there is a whole life’s worth of them) align against that notion…

I’m not the one who needs looking into the mirror and asking the hard questions.
 
If you truly think Trump is an ethical, logical, decision on leadership when all the facts (and there is a whole life’s worth of them) align against that notion…

I’m not the one who needs looking into the mirror and asking the hard questions.
This thread isnt about Trump. Go take your TDS elsewhere.
 
This thread isnt about Trump. Go take your TDS elsewhere.

The definition of a syndrome is not pointing to facts and making the common sense observation those facts clearly point to, in this case that a very bad person is not a candidate for consideration to make your leader. That would be common sense, good character and sound ethical thinking.

The syndrome would be looking at those facts and deciding that the pathological case who is a very bad person is ideal for leadership.
 
The definition of a syndrome is not pointing to facts and making the common sense observation those facts clearly point to, in this case that a very bad person is not a candidate for consideration to make your leader. That would be common sense, good character and sound ethical thinking.

The syndrome would be looking at those facts and deciding that the pathological case who is a very bad person is ideal for leadership.
The facts are that any group or individual given the responsibility to distribute funds who could not account
for where 40% of those funds went, would likely be fired at least, or even criminally prosecuted!
 
The facts are that any group or individual given the responsibility to distribute funds who could not account
for where 40% of those funds went, would likely be fired at least, or even criminally prosecuted!

Not saying different.

So you think the best choice to respond to that is to hire as their replacement a documented cheater, lying, swindling person of indisputable bad character and ethics and let him appoint, with no Constitutional Senatorial advise and consent review no less, a posse of sycophantic lackeys to facilitate his unethical, Constitution damaging, ends?

That’s TDS. That’s the “syndrome”.
 
Not saying different.

So you think the best choice to respond to that is to hire as their replacement a documented cheater, lying, swindling person of indisputable bad character and ethics and let him appoint, with no Constitutional Senatorial advise and consent review no less, a posse of sycophantic lackeys to facilitate his unethical, Constitution damaging, ends?

That’s TDS. That’s the “syndrome”.
I was not aware that Trump had anything to do with the world bank!
 
I was not aware that Trump had anything to do with the world bank!

It’s thread drift but not by much. We just made that the case, again:

’The U.S. voting share at the IBRD is 15.49% and at IDA is 9.63%. The United States is the only member of the IBRD with a voting share greater than 15% and thus veto power over major policy decisions. The President of the World Bank is selected by the IBRD Board of Directors for a five-year, renewable term.” source: Google AI
 
It’s thread drift but not by much. We just made that the case, again:

’The U.S. voting share at the IBRD is 15.49% and at IDA is 9.63%. The United States is the only member of the IBRD with a voting share greater than 15% and thus veto power over major policy decisions. The President of the World Bank is selected by the IBRD Board of Directors for a five-year, renewable term.” source: Google AI
So Biden should do something, but I suspect the President has little control. As I said anyone else would be fired!
 
It’s thread drift but not by much. We just made that the case, again:

’The U.S. voting share at the IBRD is 15.49% and at IDA is 9.63%. The United States is the only member of the IBRD with a voting share greater than 15% and thus veto power over major policy decisions. The President of the World Bank is selected by the IBRD Board of Directors for a five-year, renewable term.” source: Google AI
Didn't this all happen on Biden's watch?
 
The definition of a syndrome is not pointing to facts and making the common sense observation those facts clearly point to, in this case that a very bad person is not a candidate for consideration to make your leader. That would be common sense, good character and sound ethical thinking.

The syndrome would be looking at those facts and deciding that the pathological case who is a very bad person is ideal for leadership.
Your syndrome is appalling. But hey, deflection is the only thing you have since you cant refute the corruption of your climate cult.
 
Back
Top Bottom