Adam Radwanski said:It apparently wasn't just a rogue poll by the Strategic Counsel earlier this week. With Ekos reporting similar finding - albeit with some peculiarities in the regional breakdown - it seems the Conservatives have taken a public opinion hit from prorogation.
Whether they were expecting to take that hit is a different question, and the answer would tell us a lot about how much trouble they're really in.
<snip>
Or maybe - and from occasional glimpses of panic, this is starting to seem like a good bet - prorogation is a short-term strategy that's backfired miserably.
Maybe the weakness of the Liberals, and Canadians' general disinterest in what goes on in Parliament, led the Conservatives to think they could score a little tactical victory - sparing themselves the detainees headache with very little backlash. Maybe they even thought it would win them support, since Harper and his ministers are better able to communicate with the public when they're not stuck in Ottawa, answering opposition questions.
In other words, maybe they just misread the public's mood, and overestimated its patience. Conservative supporters should be hoping there's something more to it - if not because this will necessarily matter in the next election, then because of what it says about the instincts and the foresight of the party's decision-makers.
All according to plan? - The Globe and Mail
As soon as a competent rival becomes available, the Conservatives will be voted out.
It's more that the Liberals just need to show that they'd be an actual alternative to the Tories. Iggy hasn't been very good at showing how his gov't would be different.
You say tomato, I say tom-ah-toe.
You say tomato, I say tom-ah-toe.
As soon as a competent rival becomes available, the Conservatives will be voted out.
I guess we are looking at 2014 at the earliest. I think that the Conservatives have done a great job of 'defining' Ignatieff for him. The other people with a chance to win a leadership vote: Rae, Dryden, Dosanjh are not strong enough to win an election. The Liberals needs new blood. Besides, I don't trust party changers.
can someone explain to me why I should care about the prorogation? I mean seriously. Other than the whole avoiding the discussions of torture thing, it's not like they are on an extended vacation. They actually, from what I hear, have a very ambitious agenda for the off-time to develop ministerial plans for next year and prep the budget and the like.
Isn't all this gripe just political?
didn't the liberals do it a whole slew of times the last time they were in charge?Of course it's political, but it's not just partisan from what I've heard about. Having the PM shut down Parliament on a whim, for the simple reason of political expediency sets a bad precedent (especially when he does it twice)! In a system of Responsible Government like ours, the legislature is the most important element of our democracy, seeing as the Executive is supposedly responsible to it. Parliament is supreme, and should be treated with more respect than just the PM's play-thing. This entire charade is anti-democratic!
didn't the liberals do it a whole slew of times the last time they were in charge?
Is this a case of pretending there is breach of some custom that never really existed or hasn't existed in practice for a long time?
If the government is comfortable its legislative agenda has gone as far as they need it to go and that time would be better spent advancing their next years' agenda, then what exactly is the problem? Would it be better if they kept the house open but stopped discussing any of the bills they are happy to let die and just sit around and play bridge?
come now. it's not shut FOREVER. It's a few extra weeks while the government reformulates its legislative agenda. In the meanwhile, no new laws will be passed, so there is no disenfranchisement of our elected officals in that regard.The Commons is the only voice the people have. How is the government supposed to be kept to the minimal standards of accountability that it normally is if Parliament is shut?
I take it that you're ok with our democracy being suspended whenever the PM feels like it?
come now. it's not shut FOREVER. It's a few extra weeks while the government reformulates its legislative agenda. In the meanwhile, no new laws will be passed, so there is no disenfranchisement of our elected officals in that regard.
And he is not "suspending democracy". That would only happen if elections were not held within legally specified timeframes.
The GG can really only act within established precedant. There is no reason to deny him prorogation at this time. There probably was the last time but Harper got lucky.
PM's have used prorogation throughout history to their political advantage. Chretien left Martin holding the bag on Sponsorship when he proroged to avoid the release of the report while he was still in office.
The only way you remove the power of prorogation from the PM is to move to fixed election dates and legislated sitting days for the House/Senate. A move which would more than likely require constitutional change.
Personally I think the polls will shift again. For some reason Iggy doesn't resonate well with the electorate and this surge will be temporary at best. What the Grits need is a firebrand (albeit intelligent and well spoken) and while Iggy might have the last two of those qualities, he is most definitely missing the first.
didn't the liberals do it a whole slew of times the last time they were in charge?
Is this a case of pretending there is breach of some custom that never really existed or hasn't existed in practice for a long time?
If the government is comfortable its legislative agenda has gone as far as they need it to go and that time would be better spent advancing their next years' agenda, then what exactly is the problem? Would it be better if they kept the house open but stopped discussing any of the bills they are happy to let die and just sit around and play bridge?
Yes Chretien did it a few times
However is he the person Harper wants to be compared with?
I think not
Hey LT, good to see ya here. There's a Sanctuary for us WS refugees. Debate Politics Forums - The Whistlestopper Sanctuary
Same,
What happened to WS anyway?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?