https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46757179
In the eyes of some social media critics the United States' youngest-ever congresswoman can do no right.
To a lengthy list of past misdemeanours, including her clothes and not being rich, can now be added the grievous crime of dancing while in college.
========================================
There are no depths too deep for some to go to discredit a Dem on her first day on the job.
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46757179
In the eyes of some social media critics the United States' youngest-ever congresswoman can do no right.
To a lengthy list of past misdemeanours, including her clothes and not being rich, can now be added the grievous crime of dancing while in college.
========================================
There are no depths too deep for some to go to discredit a Dem on her first day on the job.
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46757179
In the eyes of some social media critics the United States' youngest-ever congresswoman can do no right.
To a lengthy list of past misdemeanours, including her clothes and not being rich, can now be added the grievous crime of dancing while in college.
========================================
There are no depths too deep for some to go to discredit a Dem on her first day on the job.
Any member of elected office knows what they are getting into when running for office.
If a member of Congress was in a "white" club in college or associating with the KKK that is not off limits. AOC is not above this.
Why do we even have "news" stories about someone on Twitter or Facebook complaining about stuff? Why would anyone possibly care about such things, much less care enough to write a "news" story?
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-46757179
In the eyes of some social media critics the United States' youngest-ever congresswoman can do no right.
To a lengthy list of past misdemeanours, including her clothes and not being rich, can now be added the grievous crime of dancing while in college.
========================================
There are no depths too deep for some to go to discredit a Dem on her first day on the job.
These are the people that call for civility.
These are the people who think sixteen accusations of sexual assault don't matter.
These are the people who think bragging about kissing unconsenting women and grabbing them by the ***** is "just locker room talk."
These are the people who refer to dead children as "invaders".
These are the people who go into threads around DP and attack liberals every time Trump does something awful, no matter their stated lean.
The list goes on indefinitely.
They're also the people who call a woman a "bimbo" because she danced while in college.
Why do we even have "news" stories about someone on Twitter or Facebook complaining about stuff? Why would anyone possibly care about such things, much less care enough to write a "news" story?
So you're equating "dancing" to being in a "white club" or the "kkk"?
Someone like that will not be given the benefit of the doubt. She's simply a pretty face with a paper thin resume.
These are the people that elected a child molester as their speaker of the house....and the guy with the wide stance...etc....
Probably because for the last several years, this kind of thing ends up getting repeated by tons of DP conservatives. And if other DP conservatives can't bring themselves to sharply criticize their fellows, they instead just pop into the thread to attack liberals.
More specifically, this isn't just "someone on Twitter". It starts that way. Then it's bounced around amongst Trump supporters. And then it's normalized. And then just about all DP conservatives end up saying it here. Happens all the time. So the bottom line is, it starts out as "someone on Twitter", then because it isn't bashed down by people the "someone on Twitter" does not already consider a political enemy, it because common "fake news" knowledge for a whole bunch of conservatives.
I've already seen a few people start slagging her because she danced, right in accordance with that "someone on Twitter"'s wishes.
These are the people that elected a child molester as their speaker of the house
What Speaker was convicted of "child-molesting"?
This is just slander. None of the accusations against Hastert came to light until almost a decade after he was out of Congress. You make it seem like it was known at the time and the Republicans happily elected him Speaker anyway.
Not slander.
Fact: He is a convicted child molester
Fact: He was elected as speaker of the house
Try to build a slander case :lamo
I already told you. Your obvious intention was to make it seem as though the Republicans elected him Speaker KNOWING he was a child molester.
You even put it in an order HERE to make it look like that.
An HONEST approach would be:
FACT: He was elected Speaker.
FACT: Decades later, long after he left Congress, he was convicted of child molesting.
But no. You purposely tried to link the two.
Oh, so now you know my intent. LOL
He molested children before he was speaker, so, follow me now, a child molester was elected to be speaker of the house.
Hastert and all the other creepy conservatives really shows us what kind of men move up in the Republican party.
The hilarious thing is that Grok has no idea who Hastert is, because of ignorance, or because he is a Russian agent who didn't study too hard.:lamo
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?