• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Alcoholics Anonymous - Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down?

Up or Down?

  • Thumbs Up

    Votes: 31 68.9%
  • Thumbs Down

    Votes: 14 31.1%

  • Total voters
    45
Denial works great for a lot of people...

Apparently you've bought into it. Cars serve a demonstrable purpose. If that purpose goes away, virtually everyone will stop driving cars. That does not quality as an addiction. Try again.
 
I think AA helps some people quit drinking and stay sober.
That's a good thing.
Thumbs up.
 

Let me re-phrase then.... I am a self-control freak. I don't try to control others, just myself. And you know what, for many whether codependent or not feel like life is totally ****ed up while being sober.... I've been there for quite a while now. Problem is, being drunk or high only guarantees it will remain ****ed up. I've never had any sympathy for co-dependent because I've seen where 90% they are also entirely the "enablers" although what I've seen is more like pushing them to use and abuse alcohol and/or drugs in very passive aggressive ways.

I will not now nor ever feel sympathy for co-dependents, they have a choice, they can leave that person and go on with their lives. But instead they find so much power in screwing around with an addict, helping getting clean, then nagging and nudging and pushing about all manner of stupid crap until they re-offend, rinse and repeat forever. Most of the time the addict would be better served if he/she would recognize that they need to get away and stay away from co-dependents, who aren't sick at all, but are taking advantage of the addict's illness, ....the worst kind of asshole.
 

Has it occurred to you that I might k now what I'm talking about?
 

Fed up with the lifestyle, concerned about money and potential problems are all consequences. If one has NO consequences whatsoever and no potential consequences, and the behavior is enjoyable, there is no reason to stop.


Sometimes it is the court that gets an addict into treatment. Once there, then there is the possibility that it may take.

IMO, in most cases, the ONLY way for an addict to truly kick their addiction (whatever it is) is to want to kick it badly enough - not for others to try and force him/her to kick it.

Certainly, in order to be in recovery, the addict has to want it. But the initial alteration in behavior can and usually does come from some outside source.


One can certainly understand what an addict goes through without being an addict. You correctly identified the underlying cause... some sort of emotional pain that the addict is trying to cover or run from. Anyone can understand that kind of emotional pain. Different people handle it differently and make different choices around it. But the pain can be understood, regardless of the coping skills (health or unhealthy).
 
Oh great...some know-it-all counsellor who just because he makes money off of other people's misery and apparently thinks he understands it all.

I understand it a whole lot better than you. You just seem to be some addict who is just pissed that he can't use crack anymore and, in a holier than thou way, has decided that he knows what's best for anyone with an addiction.

Gee like I have not run into this type before...not.

I've run into your type plenty of times before. We call them "dry drunks". The only difference between you and an addict is that you don't use anymore. Same issues. Just no drugs.

Having dealt with you before I will not waste my time trying to convince you of anything...the effort would be wasted.

I don't consider demonstrating that you don't know what you are talking about a waste. I consider it a public service for anyone here who might read what you write on this topic and take is seriously.


Nope. It's not a crutch... anymore than a diabetic who needs insulin uses that insulin as a crutch. Like it or not, addiction is a medical condition and using something like AA to assist with that medical condition is not a crutch... not in the way that you are terming it. Your opinion that an addiction isn't a medical condition, is just that. An opinion, and an uninformed one at that. It speaks more towards your own issues than the issue we are discussing.


Semantics. You have stopped. You have not quit. Quit indicates a cure.


I explained this to you in my last post. It is the height of arrogance to think of yourself as some special snowflake whom most cannot understand. I hear that from addicts all the time. It's an excuse. That's all.

hat's next? Assuming you are a man, are you going to tell women how you know better then they do what childbirth feels like?

Apparently you don't know the difference between physical pain and emotional pain.

Go back to your practice and make more money telling other people about things you have never experienced yourself pal.

We are done here as I am not wasting another minute on your know-it-all, arrogant nonsense.

Good day.

Let me explain it to you. You came in here with some holier than thou arrogance, based on your personal experience and tried to pass it off as truth. Firstly, I am far more arrogant than you, I'm better at it, and your personal experience in no way proves your position. You seem to believe that because your experience was terrible, that discounts AA as viable. THAT is the height of arrogance, but the problem with your arrogance is that it has no basis in logic. That's the difference between your arrogance and mine. Now, all you seem to be capable of doing is making invalid assumptions. And I will continue to demonstrate that they make no sense. Feel free to ignore my posts, but you can count on me NOT doing the same if you try to arrogantly present your experiences as FACT again.
 
Has it occurred to you that I might k now what I'm talking about?

He keeps making these preposterous assumptions that just support his position... but are nothing but assumptions nonetheless. AA works for many. Doesn't work for some. It didn't work for him. And that last fact is irrelevant to a global assessment on AA.
 

I feel almost the exact same way and took issue with the "crutch" comment as well. The thing about being an addict is it makes you want to believe that you get it - "it" meaning everything about addiction. Unfortunately, everything is subjective and while it's fine to talk about your experiences (I appreciate anybody who is willing to admit to being or having been an addict) it's better to say "in my experience..." rather than something like "here's how it is..."

Like I said in my previous posts, there is no right and wrong. There is no cure. The vast, vast majority of addicts and alcoholics don't respond well to treatment. And the people who follow the most successful treatment plans, such as methadone maintenance for opiate addicts, are the most looked down upon. I am not an alcoholic but I have family members who are, and I've been to AA, and I can understand why somebody would not like it but we - and especially the addicts and former addicts - should not be slamming it.
 
There is that. A person I know got popped for a DUI a few years ago. He had to be assessed to see if he had a problem and needed treatment, or if it was a fluke and no treatment needed.

Guess who got to do the assessment? The same people who did the treatments.

Guess what the assessment concluded? Surprise!... treatment was "necessary".

I have since heard that the slightest thing makes treatment necessary, and conclusions of no treatment necessary are pretty much non-existent.
 

Anecdotes are often nice stories, but not evidence in a debate. They are proof of nothing as they are an example of "ONE" and as most rules have exceptions, an anecdote can be nothing but one of those exceptions. Unless the proposition includes "ALL" or "NONE" we have to accept the anecdote as nothing by a nice story. AA will never tell you they have a 100% success rate nor will they tell you that they are the ONLY path (they will tell you they are the BEST path).

So, my mere response is "that's nice".
 
Last edited:
They work together (generally), so it's partially their fault.
 

Thanks for disagreeing with my OP in a nice way - I respect your opinion.
 
Everybody is addicted to something. I'd be willing to bet you're addicted to the air in your car's tires.
I can't help but laugh at people who claim to have no addictions or shortcomings. I'm sorry, but everybody has something with which they struggle.
 
Is someone profitting? Corruption? Conflict of interest?
In my previous post (#109) I pointed out a local AA-like outfit that gets assigned by the court to asses people's "need" for treatment. They also get to do the treatment, and pretty nobody ever gets a pass, so yes, I'd say there's a conflict of interest.

I will add that this court appointed status is the vast bulk of their business overall. They are legally classified as a non-profit, but in the real world they have to make enough of a "profit" to meet expanses, pay salaries (which is incentive enough to cause a conflict of interest, keeping oneself employed), and so on.
 
While it is true that many have been able to get clean and sober without AA, it has been my experience that those who most criticize and/or disrespect organizations like AA are those who most likely to suffer from addiction or codependency and/or are in serious danger of relapse. There is no more efficient liar in the world than an addict or codependent--efficient at lying to themselves. And others. It isn't they intentionally set out to lie. It is just the only way they can continue in their addiction in peace or justify their feelings and behavior that is controlled by codependency. And to hear others speak of what they are lying about to themselves or others is just too uncomfortable or offensive for some to tolerate. That, plus a few really bad groups that don't reflect the core values of the program, is why most reject the program.

But in my opinion alcoholism and the other addictions are a real mental, physical, and spiritual sickness and it truly is a family disease. Codependency is not chosen by any who suffer from it, but very few, if any, who are in close contact with the addict will not have negative impact on their own mental, spiritual, and sometimes physical well being.

A good AA group and sponsor knows this, understands this, and, for those who are willing to give it an honest chance, can help people regain control of their lives without the substance(s) or activities (such as gambling) that they are addicted to.

AA is not the crutch. The substance or activity they are addicted to is the crutch. Without it they don't feel comfortable or normal. AA can help people live productive lives without the crutch.
 
While I'm not religious, I will support any institution that helps people overcome addiction.

Alcohol is one of the worst addictions in this country, and it is something many suffer from. It leads to financial ruin. It kills thousands upon thousands. Why knock something that helps many? I personally know several success stories I could point at that show me AA works. I myself ha e been to meetings. Like I said, I'm not religious. But there was less religion there are more community.
 

Thanks for your respectful post - will consider what you said.
 

That's the thing. While God will be acknowledged in the AA program overall and in the steps, God can be whatever the person wants to make it. The higher power can be a concept or a possibility or the group itself or whatever--there is never a requirement that anybody embrace religion at all in order to participate in the program. Members of the group are just expected to respect the rights of those who are. It has been an interesting phenomenon for me, though, to watch how many non believers or non religious, after some time in the program, started to warm up to the possibility that the higher power was real. There are exceptions of course, but nobody is ever disrespected for not being a 'believer'.
 

It's apparent you missed one of the more important Traditions in AA, despite the years you claim you were involved in it.

They have no opinion on outside issues, including your experience with the program. As such, the only comments your likely to get will be from people who don't know any better, or don't have any experience with it, so I don't know how much ammunition your going to gather to throw back at your girlfriend.

Since your girlfriend thought you would benefit from such a program, I wish you well in dealing with whatever issue she thought you need help with.
 

Point taken. And thanks for the well wishes.
 

Agreed. There is no "cure", there are only "treatments". You are right... most addicts remain active and no treatment really helps. But AA is one of the more successful ones out there. It certainly isn't for everyone, and there are people who do very well without it. But, as you said, slamming AA makes no sense, since it does have some effectiveness.
 

There are no salaries with AA. There is no one providing treatment. AA is a support group. "Treatment" indicates professionals providing this. That is not what is happening in AA. Courts assign people to go to AA meeting because they have seen it be helpful. AA really doesn't get anything out of it.
 

Awesome post. Right on target.
 
Having an addict who recovered in my family I can safely say that there is only one way you recover an addict contrary to what all the sycophants will tell you. Cold turkey. That's the only way to have it work.



AA and things like it take a bunch of addicts and put them together. The absolute last thing they need. Addicts are weak humans. They empower their addiction by other weak humans making their addiction seem okay. AA meetings are full of rapists and user type people who understand this truth and abuse it. The last place any addict belongs is a place with other addicts. It's the same reason rehab centers full of addicts don't work. You have to cut out the other sick people from that weak persons life.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…