I think you're right on point, actually.
I think the real reason why homosexuals are demanding homosexual marriage has nothing whatsoever to do with equal rights because they already have equal rights. They are pursuing the homosexual marriage agenda for two primary reasons.
1. To poke a stick in the eye of Christians and Christianity
2. To be able to say that homosexuality is normal
Civil Unions wouldn't do those two things even if they conveyed every benefit that marriage does to homosexual couples. Therefore, civil unions were unacceptable. It had nothing at all to do with rights. This issue has been driven by homosexual militants. Most homosexuals I've know have had no interest in marriage for the sake of marriage. Many have told me that their homosexual lifestyle was about eschewing the "normal" model of marriage and kids.
What the long term consequences will be, no one knows because no society that endorsed homosexuality has stood the test of time and so we have no example to take a lesson from. But I think it's clear to see that in our country, the homosexuals will prevail. How it changes society in this country is something we can only guess about.
Well, we don't find the religious angle to be useful, or intelligent, either. That doesn't stop you and your ilk.
I'm not religious. You don't have to be religious to understand that homosexual marriage is an oxymoron.
I just cut to the chase. I know this argument. Try to pretend that denying homosexuals state sanction of their marriage is like denying otherwise normal heterosexual couples from marrying because one of them isn't the "right" race. It's not a racial issue. Forbidding marriage among interracial couples that are in every other way qualified to be married just because they're not both the same race is not constitutional. I don't find the "race" angle to be useful at all for proponents of homosexual marriage.
Bull. You people vote against civil unions too.
The word marriage has religious connotations that is why the gays refused to accept civil unions. The act and benefits might be secular but the gays dont want that they want the word
I think you're right on point, actually.
I think the real reason why homosexuals are demanding homosexual marriage has nothing whatsoever to do with equal rights because they already have equal rights. They are pursuing the homosexual marriage agenda for two primary reasons.
1. To poke a stick in the eye of Christians and Christianity
I'm not religious. You don't have to be religious to understand that homosexual marriage is an oxymoron.
I think you're right on point, actually.
1.) I think the real reason why homosexuals are demanding homosexual marriage has nothing whatsoever to do with equal rights because they already have equal rights.
2.)They are pursuing the homosexual marriage agenda for two primary reasons.
A. To poke a stick in the eye of Christians and Christianity
B. To be able to say that homosexuality is normal
3.)Civil Unions wouldn't do those two things even if they conveyed every benefit that marriage does to homosexual couples. Therefore, civil unions were unacceptable.
4.) It had nothing at all to do with rights. This issue has been driven by homosexual militants. Most homosexuals I've know have had no interest in marriage for the sake of marriage. Many have told me that their homosexual lifestyle was about eschewing the "normal" model of marriage and kids. What the long term consequences will be, no one knows because no society that endorsed homosexuality has stood the test of time and so we have no example to take a lesson from. But I think it's clear to see that in our country, the homosexuals will prevail. How it changes society in this country is something we can only guess about.
I'm not religious. You don't have to be religious to understand that homosexual marriage is an oxymoron.
That's it. It's all about you.
We the people don't want our state to endorse homosexual marriage. I imagine it's a matter of time before the deviant left wins this but for now, the will of the people still prevails in my state. Thanks for asking.
Why do you care? I thought you weren't religious?
1.)I don't support civil unions either, now. I did a few years ago. I thought it was an excellent way to provide the "equal rights" homosexuals were clamoring for without a great deal of political resistance.
2.) Of course, it became very clear to me after many discussions with homsexuals that it really wasn't about equal rights at all because that was rejected off hand because it didn't make homosexuality "as normal as heterosexuality".
3.) I was, however, of the mind that it was a reasonable concession to provide civil unions to any two people who wanted to be in a domestic partnership.
4.) But after my idiot militant homosexual activist brother (the same one that claims the government invented AIDS to wipe out homosexuals) threw a hissy fit and told me I need to get off the fence and stop being "ambivalent", I got off the fence. Now I can't and won't support either homosexual marriage or civil unions. The in-your-face attitude of militant homosexual activists isn't something that promotes sympathy or compassion. Not for me, anyway.
5.)Those homosexuals who want to believe everyone that doesn't think homosexual marriage makes sense must be a religious right extremist are deluding themselves.
Deviant?
Now you are really showing your cards.
Seems that the anti SSM zealots think a lot about gay sex, much more than gays do. Why is that? LOL
Thank you for sharing that stupid assumption with me. I'm not religious. You don't have to be religious to acknowledge that the desire to poke a stick in the eye of Christians is one of the primary motivations for homosexuals demanding marriage instead of civil unions. You just have to be honest and willing to call things the way they really are.
I don't care. I don't have a dog in that fight. You don't have to have a dog in the fight to recognize a dogfight when you see one, do you?
I don't care. I don't have a dog in that fight. You don't have to have a dog in the fight to recognize a dogfight when you see one, do you?
this just goes to show how much you are severely uneducated about this topic.
ALL AMERICANS have a dog in this fight, we always do when its about equal rights lol
I don't care. I don't have a dog in that fight. You don't have to have a dog in the fight to recognize a dogfight when you see one, do you?
What freedom? Gays could already have a ceremony and live happily ever after, they didnt even just want the govt benefits of marriage under a different name (civil union) they wanted to destroy the religious meaning of marriage. Gay marriage is about religious bigotry. If it was the gay civil union movement yall could have won that decades ago.
LMAOYou keep trying to frame it as an equal rights issue and it isn't.
Then why did you bring it up as one of your bullet points if you don't care? That makes no sense at all. And BTW: being gay is normal, just like being black is normal. You might want to figure that one out.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?