Interesting bit of information. THanks.I grew up in rural Louisiana. I didn't have that much trouble. I get along with southern whites better than I do northern whites, actually. I'm the only black person at my job, working with whites, Mexicans and one El Salvadoran. I have more trouble with the Mexicans than anyone else.
Experienced it, more than once. Fifteen or so arrests, no convictions.Uh, yeah! Believe that! :lamo
I bet you would trade laces with Denzel Washington. Oh wait, he's very Conservative; maybe you wouldn't. You wouldn't want your Libbo pards calling you 'Uncle Tom'.
Well I didn't find it very humourous that the ERA didn't pass. But enjoy yourself. It didn't.
not nearly at the rate black males do
52% of the murders in the USA are committed by about 6% of the population
and w
rhen it comes to Africa, the racist south africans were minor leaguers compared to the genocide perpetrated by black on black murderers
It seems the base line has been moved. Now fair representation isn't enough, it has to be majority representation.
With this criteria every state in the union would be racist, sexist, homophobic or whatever.
You worte exactly what I responded to and this post confirms it. Claiming that all white people are to blame for racism is hate speech in itself.
What I find most shocking, is how some folks think that black people are so weak minded, that a simple thing like racism will keep them down.
With another hundred years of lynching and separate bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters to follow.Well, it succeeded pretty well for a 150 years.
With another hundred years of lynching and separate bathrooms, water fountains and lunch counters to follow.
So, there are still lynchings and seperate bathrooms now and for the next 100 years?
1864 until 1964 = 100 years of Jim Crow.
1864 until 1964 = 100 years of Jim Crow.
Yes, if they had owners they'd have jobs.So now all of those mississippi slaves can go free out into the shrinking economy and not find jobs ?
...
You'd be taken more serious on the issue if you knew how to spell Jim Crow. However, since you don't, I figure you know little or nothing about it.It's ironic that the term Jim Crowe still exist in contemporaryl conversation.
It's apparent that those who repeat it are the least intersted in a world free of racism.
LOL I'll say!
It's ironic that the term Jim Crowe still exist in contemporaryl conversation.
It's apparent that those who repeat it are the least intersted in a world free of racism.
You'd be taken more serious on the issue if you knew how to spell Jim Crow. However, since you don't, I figure you know little or nothing about it.
Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks for playing.
That makes sense. But weait, isn't that how the Torries spell it?
You'd be taken more serious on the issue if you knew how to spell Jim Crow. However, since you don't, I figure you know little or nothing about it.
Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thanks for playing.
So, there are still lynchings and seperate bathrooms now and for the next 100 years?
You don't know much about it either, since you think Jim Crow started in 1864.
I used it as a marker for roughly when the 13th was ratified (it was actually official in 1865), it being 100 years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. You got a problem with that?
No, thanks to Lyndon Johnson and a liberal congress, those things are a thing of the past. However, should Ron Paul ever be elected President and the Civil Rights Act repealed, we could see it again.
No, you said Jim Crow was inacted in 1864, which is historically inaccurate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?