- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Yes, I wouldn't really burn dvds over her admitting to having a severe mental disorder.
Only to leftist, to intelligent logical human beings, they accept the fact that there is really no mental difference between homosexuality, bestiality, pedophilia or any other sexual preference disorder. Funny, they claim all the rest are wrong but theirs is somehow normal.
For pity's sake, it's couldn't care less. At least get this right, would you?
And look who's "pontificating," missy. I haven't demeaned anyone at all.
You didn't "misunderstand" my words; you assigned to me words, thoughts, and feelings that I have never expressed and don't hold. And I am not "everybody" either. I have said nothing at all about this actor except that I’m bored with coming out publicly in general. Which I am.
You truly are clueless if you think that some starlet making a public announcement that she’s gay matters as much as people who are gay being able to work without harassment. Most people don't even think twice about who's straight or gay in the workplace. That's the victory.
Your not getting this would be funny if only it weren’t so tragic that you flatter yourself that you're some sort of liberal avenger-hero when you swoop down to brand someone as lacking in compassion or empathy when nothing has been said to indicate this at all.
No, I am not going to “clarify my position.” What I said was plain and simple. I don’t know why you’re projecting, but you are fabricating opinions and feelings for me that I have never expressed. Grow up and read what people actually say rather than what you desire to project.
From John Hawkins (on why liberals can be such unpleasant people):
Reason #3: Liberals see people who disagree as evil: Liberals see themselves as part of a Manichean struggle in which they’re trying to create Utopia on earth while they’re being opposed by people who want to do evil for evil’s sake. In other words, liberals are about as complex as your average comic book from the fifties. As Charles Krauthammer has said, “To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.”
When you attribute disagreements with Barack Obama to racism, opposition to gay marriage to homophobia, standing against abortion as hatred of women, and a desire to balance the budget to loathing of the poor, you have a hopelessly simplistic view of the world that makes you utterly impervious to reason. Stupid, you may be able to educate, but evil, you have to defeat -- and liberals are seldom picky about the means or the manners they use while trying to do so.
Reason #5: Liberalism encourages arrogance: Liberals tend to believe they're brilliant, compassionate, moral, enlightened, perceptive, and courageous, not because of anything they've actually done, but just because they're liberal. When you completely divorce a person's self image from his behavior, it produces terrible results -- like liberals who hurl abuse at conservative women while believing that they're feminists or selfish left-wingers who've never given a dime to charity, but believe themselves to be much more compassionate than people who tithe 10% of their income.
5 Reasons Liberals Are Such Unpleasant People To Be Around - John Hawkins - Page 1
Throughout the human race, homosexuality is the only time when a man has a sexual attraction to other than a "adult" female or female to other than an adult male that it is not considered a mental disorder. Why is that? Why is every other deviation considered normal except that one?
If it is normal, then why does replacing a deficiency in pregnant women remove most of the probability of female children growing up to be homosexual?
In a study by the University of New Mexico done jointly with a California University, title "Why Women Cheat", they were able to observe, catalog and then reproduce the same results mapping out hormonal reactions in women in the presence of male hormones? If homosexuality is normal, then where are those male hormones coming from since the female body does not produce them?
The only thing making me "wrong" in your view is the fact that due to being emotionally attached to your current view, you have closed yourself off to alternative views and theories. Which btw, your belief is not provable using scientific methods, unless of course we allow experimentation upon humans, something I definitely do not support.
Only to leftist, to intelligent logical human beings, they accept the fact that there is really no mental difference between homosexuality, bestiality, pedophilia or any other sexual preference disorder. Funny, they claim all the rest are wrong but theirs is somehow normal.
And the partisan award goes to...
And the partisan award goes to...
For pity's sake, it's couldn't care less. At least get this right, would you?
And look who's "pontificating," missy. I haven't demeaned anyone at all.
You didn't "misunderstand" my words; you assigned to me words, thoughts, and feelings that I have never expressed and don't hold. And I am not "everybody" either. I have said nothing at all about this actor except that I’m bored with coming out publicly in general. Which I am.
You truly are clueless if you think that some starlet making a public announcement that she’s gay matters as much as people who are gay being able to work without harassment. Most people don't even think twice about who's straight or gay in the workplace. That's the victory.
Your not getting this would be funny if only it weren’t so tragic that you flatter yourself that you're some sort of liberal avenger-hero when you swoop down to brand someone as lacking in compassion or empathy when nothing has been said to indicate this at all.
No, I am not going to “clarify my position.” What I said was plain and simple. I don’t know why you’re projecting, but you are fabricating opinions and feelings for me that I have never expressed. Grow up and read what people actually say rather than what you desire to project.
From John Hawkins (on why liberals can be such unpleasant people):
Reason #3: Liberals see people who disagree as evil: Liberals see themselves as part of a Manichean struggle in which they’re trying to create Utopia on earth while they’re being opposed by people who want to do evil for evil’s sake. In other words, liberals are about as complex as your average comic book from the fifties. As Charles Krauthammer has said, “To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.”
When you attribute disagreements with Barack Obama to racism, opposition to gay marriage to homophobia, standing against abortion as hatred of women, and a desire to balance the budget to loathing of the poor, you have a hopelessly simplistic view of the world that makes you utterly impervious to reason. Stupid, you may be able to educate, but evil, you have to defeat -- and liberals are seldom picky about the means or the manners they use while trying to do so.
Reason #5: Liberalism encourages arrogance: Liberals tend to believe they're brilliant, compassionate, moral, enlightened, perceptive, and courageous, not because of anything they've actually done, but just because they're liberal. When you completely divorce a person's self image from his behavior, it produces terrible results -- like liberals who hurl abuse at conservative women while believing that they're feminists or selfish left-wingers who've never given a dime to charity, but believe themselves to be much more compassionate than people who tithe 10% of their income.
5 Reasons Liberals Are Such Unpleasant People To Be Around - John Hawkins - Page 1
Seriously, watch the speech, it will bring tears to your eyes. So happy and proud of her. You can tell she was very nervous and this meant a lot to her.
Actress Ellen Page: "I am gay" - CNN.com
For pity's sake, it's couldn't care less. At least get this right, would you?
And look who's "pontificating," missy. I haven't demeaned anyone at all.
You didn't "misunderstand" my words; you assigned to me words, thoughts, and feelings that I have never expressed and don't hold. And I am not "everybody" either. I have said nothing at all about this actor except that I’m bored with coming out publicly in general. Which I am.
You truly are clueless if you think that some starlet making a public announcement that she’s gay matters as much as people who are gay being able to work without harassment. Most people don't even think twice about who's straight or gay in the workplace. That's the victory.
Your not getting this would be funny if only it weren’t so tragic that you flatter yourself that you're some sort of liberal avenger-hero when you swoop down to brand someone as lacking in compassion or empathy when nothing has been said to indicate this at all.
No, I am not going to “clarify my position.” What I said was plain and simple. I don’t know why you’re projecting, but you are fabricating opinions and feelings for me that I have never expressed. Grow up and read what people actually say rather than what you desire to project.
From John Hawkins (on why liberals can be such unpleasant people):
Reason #3: Liberals see people who disagree as evil: Liberals see themselves as part of a Manichean struggle in which they’re trying to create Utopia on earth while they’re being opposed by people who want to do evil for evil’s sake. In other words, liberals are about as complex as your average comic book from the fifties. As Charles Krauthammer has said, “To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.”
When you attribute disagreements with Barack Obama to racism, opposition to gay marriage to homophobia, standing against abortion as hatred of women, and a desire to balance the budget to loathing of the poor, you have a hopelessly simplistic view of the world that makes you utterly impervious to reason. Stupid, you may be able to educate, but evil, you have to defeat -- and liberals are seldom picky about the means or the manners they use while trying to do so.
Reason #5: Liberalism encourages arrogance: Liberals tend to believe they're brilliant, compassionate, moral, enlightened, perceptive, and courageous, not because of anything they've actually done, but just because they're liberal. When you completely divorce a person's self image from his behavior, it produces terrible results -- like liberals who hurl abuse at conservative women while believing that they're feminists or selfish left-wingers who've never given a dime to charity, but believe themselves to be much more compassionate than people who tithe 10% of their income.
5 Reasons Liberals Are Such Unpleasant People To Be Around - John Hawkins - Page 1
Personally, when I hear about someone "coming out" nowadays, usually I think two things:
1) No big deal... to me, it's equivalent to someone coming out as straight.
2) Somewhat brave in this climate, when even though there is more acceptance of homosexuality, we still see hateful, ignorant, bigotry around, similar to what we see from some in this thread.
If she is so gay then why did she rape the Crimson Bolt?Seriously, watch the speech, it will bring tears to your eyes. So happy and proud of her. You can tell she was very nervous and this meant a lot to her.
Actress Ellen Page: "I am gay" - CNN.com
I don't think that is a logical analogy. No one comes out as straight, it is assumed.
Another example of Tigger being incapable of dealing with anything that causes his cognitive dissonance to flair up.
Not incapable just unwilling. Of course it would require a moral lobotomy to make me capable, but it could be done.
I can't speak for CC, but I interpreted his point as being that "coming out" and/or being gay is commonplace enough in today's western society as to be figuratively similar.I don't think that is a logical analogy. No one comes out as straight, it is assumed.
TO ME, it's equivalent. I see someone saying that they are gay as being equivalent to someone saying that they are straight. I understand that not many see it similarly.
I can't speak for CC, but I interpreted his point as being that "coming out" and/or being gay is commonplace enough in today's western society as to be figuratively similar.
I pretty much always like your posts, nota, but if you can't see how those "reasons" apply to some conservatives as much as they do to some liberals, then either I've misjudged you or you were having a bad day.
Seriously, watch the speech, it will bring tears to your eyes. So happy and proud of her. You can tell she was very nervous and this meant a lot to her.
Actress Ellen Page: "I am gay" - CNN.com
Who is Ellen Page?
Fortunately, it seems she is more enlightened then that.
And I will hope that you get over the fact that people are born straight and people are born gay, and it has nothing to do with any "god".
Go ahead and pray...the rest of us will do the thinking.
I had a feeling she was, not that it really matters.
That sales pitch has gotten old.
And I pray there's a spot in heaven for the multitude of highly judgmental Christians out there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?