Nope, don't do that either. Wow, you really don't know a single thing, do you?You're a person who chooses to take ****.
Lighten up, Francis. Gay debates are nothing but sport. You don't "win" anything.
Nope, don't do that either. Wow, you really don't know a single thing, do you?
Yep, that's the kind of quality response that I've come to expect from you.Yawn.
They may be "sport" to you, Francis, but they are about the real lives of gay people. So, why don't you think about that for a second? You may be engaging in something you think of as "sport," but your doing so about real people. Wow...there is a lot of fail in this thread.
I harbor no hatred for them. I've mixed socially with them on many, many occasions, and it's no big deal at all. I really have no dog in this "debate".
I just find these incessant gay debates purposeless. They aren't being denied anything. They're citizens, they're free, they're often successful, and they live the lives they've chosen to live just fine. Civil unions were long in place.
But there's an inherent need among the gay community as a whole to constantly be front and center. Just living quietly among the folks simply will not do. And the media, especially Hollywood, is pushing at every corner to make it seem as if they constitute 50 percent of the population, which simply isn't true. It's not normal, as they seem to insist it be taken. It's not illegal, and I certainly don't know anyone personally trying to persecute them in any way.
Being ignored is the gay activist's Kryptonite. It simply will not do.
Yep, that's the kind of quality response that I've come to expect from you.
There's no such thing as a homosexual person, there's only homosexual acts. Just like there's no such thing as a pot smoker, just people who happen to smoke pot.
People are people. Just like you can choose to stop smoking pot, you can choose to stop taking **** up the ass. Life is full of choices, but we're all people.
In other words, you gotta separate the sinner from the sin, you follow?
Couldn't be more wrong if you tried. There is something to be said for getting same sex attractions exclusively, whether we act on them or not. Ultimately this tactic of yours isn't going to make someone up and change his identity, because it cannot change how they feel. They remain attracted to same sex.
There's also more to being homosexual than "taking it up the ass." There's commitment, embracing, cuddling, but of course leave it to a phobic to obsess over the one sex act he finds disgusting.
LOL right, how else do you explain that millions of people at the time of puberty become attracted to same sex?
What exactly in that process is unnatural?
There's also more to being homosexual than "taking it up the ass."
I harbor no hatred for them. I've mixed socially with them on many, many occasions, and it's no big deal at all. I really have no dog in this "debate".
I just find these incessant gay debates purposeless. They aren't being denied anything. They're citizens, they're free, they're often successful, and they live the lives they've chosen to live just fine. Civil unions were long in place.
But there's an inherent need among the gay community as a whole to constantly be front and center. Just living quietly among the folks simply will not do. And the media, especially Hollywood, is pushing at every corner to make it seem as if they constitute 50 percent of the population, which simply isn't true. It's not normal, as they seem to insist it be taken. It's not illegal, and I certainly don't know anyone personally trying to persecute them in any way.
Being ignored is the gay activist's Kryptonite. It simply will not do.
Must we resort to name calling? How distasteful.
Why do you give a crap who she dates? Unless, of course, your just upset that she won't date you.
Something must have rubbed me the wrong way in this comment: "There's no such thing as a homosexual person."
Yes it leaves open the possibility that homosexuality is a choice. You can't be labeled a bigot if all you've done is disagree with someone's life choices. Boom. You've been owned
Lighten up, Francis. Gay debates are nothing but sport. You don't "win" anything.
So wait...now there is such a thing as a homosexual? Did you give yourself whiplash reversing yourself like that?
So I would not be a bigot is I disagree with people being religious(not their religion, but being religious at all)?
Hmm good point. At the end of the day, though, "bigot" is just a word intended to insult. Really calling someone a bigot is no different from calling them a stupid poopyface.
I harbor no hatred for them. I've mixed socially with them on many, many occasions, and it's no big deal at all. I really have no dog in this "debate".
I just find these incessant gay debates purposeless. They aren't being denied anything. They're citizens, they're free, they're often successful, and they live the lives they've chosen to live just fine. Civil unions were long in place.
But there's an inherent need among the gay community as a whole to constantly be front and center. Just living quietly among the folks simply will not do. And the media, especially Hollywood, is pushing at every corner to make it seem as if they constitute 50 percent of the population, which simply isn't true. It's not normal, as they seem to insist it be taken. It's not illegal, and I certainly don't know anyone personally trying to persecute them in any way.
Being ignored is the gay activist's Kryptonite. It simply will not do.
There's no such thing as a homosexual person, there's only homosexual acts. Just like there's no such thing as a pot smoker, just people who happen to smoke pot.
People are people. Just like you can choose to stop smoking pot, you can choose to stop taking **** up the ass. Life is full of choices, but we're all people.
In other words, you gotta separate the sinner from the sin, you follow?
Yeah, there's no "look-at-me" flamboyance going on in the gay community. You betcha. My gosh, it's an endless mass of reality-show wannabes.
lol what?
sorry homosexuals factual exist
facts win again
I don't care at all. And I'm too ugly for her. However, artificially restricting one's sexuality to mating exclusively w/only one gender (i. e. labeling oneself as either "gay" or "straight" is unhealthy.
:lamoThere's only evidence that homosexual behavior exists, and that it's a natural phenomena.
There's zero evidence of rigid gender-restricted sexuality, which is what being "gay" entails.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?