Funny.
It looks like it separates Congress from the ability to tax, regulate or prohibit an establishment of Religion to me.
Yeah, that is funny.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
laugh away.
If you had actually read the original comment you would have known the statement was about the founders of the ACLU being communists which is exactly accurate.
But of course instead of that you chose to spiral off on some wild sarcastic tangent which had nothing to do with the original statement.
Reading comprehension FTW
Is this the post i 'dodged'
Yes I so care.
Since when was communism illegal?
(uh oh secret commie!)
The ACLU is usually right, and most of the opposition to them comes from people completely misunderstanding their positions or believing outright lies about them.
What are the "outright lies" about the ACLU?
j-mac
Was it comedic or was it an instructional on how to child molest?
Thanks for the clarification. Icky.
My gawd you mean an entire population of people are rampantly misinformed and believe the ACLU supports child molestation and is anti-christian because they don't understand the premises of the cases it contends in?
No Wai...:rofl
They should change legal jargon and language to one that we can all understand! That way these things wont happen.
I'm thinking of the "they support child molesting" because they defended a guy who was accused of encouraging child molestors with some website.
That it?
j-mac
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?