• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

About Trump's withdrawl of the US from the Paris Climate Agreement

Lafayette

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2015
Messages
9,594
Reaction score
2,072
Location
France
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
From the World Health Organization's Fact sheet - Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health



One must presume nobody suggested to Donald Dork that he reads the above fact-sheet regarding the tight link between pollution and death-rates in a country.

From the MIT News, Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S. - excerpt:
You have to be brainless to disregard the results from rigorous analysis over the period of time given (a decade).

Just remember - the next death due to climate-change (for the worse) as described above could by yours ...
 
A rather interesting tie in between Air pollution and CO2, especially since the cited document, "WHO Air quality guidelines"
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69477/1/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf
does not mention CO2!
So at 409 ppm, is CO2 dangerous?
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
While the table shows that 2 to 3% may cause shortness of breath, we should consider how many parts per million that is.
2 % is 2 parts per hundred, or 20 parts per thousand, or 20,000 parts per million.
Not only are we a long way from where CO2 would become a toxic gas issue, it would be
almost impossible for human activity to ever increase CO2 level to the point it would be so.
 

Is this a lame attempt to equate having air pollution "goals" to having CO2 level "goals"?

Your source makes no mention of CA or Baltimore having high CO2 levels - probably because CO2 is not an air pollution health issue at all.

What are the drastic effects of current world CO2 levels on world health?

Your source seems to lack any - probably because neither climate change nor CO2 levels have caused massive health problems.

The stuff that comes out of car exhaust or power plants which causes these health problems is not CO2.
 

You don't seem to understand that the Paris accord is nothing to do with air quality.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…