The 'Russian 'scandal' is how easily the democrats have ****ed you and millions like you using Russia as their scapegoat.The Russian scandal is just getting started.
The 'Russian 'scandal' is how easily the democrats have ****ed you and millions like you using Russia as their scapegoat.
At some point...since its so easy we just have to figure its not really them raping you since you are so eager and willing.
You mean the baby cages Obama built? You mean the 70,000 children a year that came here, separated from their families...(THEY WERE SEPARATED FORM THEIR FAMILIES!!!!! OH THE HORROR!!!!)...that were often beaten raped, murdered, used by drug cartels, etc?Why do gops support baby cages and institutionalized child abuse?
:lamo
Riiiight. See, theres that 'bull****' again. You bleat on with this pretense of care over children 'separated' from their families...but then you excuse, justify...nah...WORSE...you just ignore the 70,000 children a year during the Obama administration that were 'separated from their families'.
Because...thats different.
You ignore those children in cages, many as young as 5...because during the Obama administration, that was different.
Your poutrage is a sad ****ing joke.
The 'Russian 'scandal' is how easily the democrats have ****ed you and millions like you using Russia as their scapegoat.
At some point...since its so easy we just have to figure its not really them raping you since you are so eager and willing.
You mean the baby cages Obama built? You mean the 70,000 children a year that came here, separated from their families...(THEY WERE SEPARATED FORM THEIR FAMILIES!!!!! OH THE HORROR!!!!)...that were often beaten raped, murdered, used by drug cartels, etc?
Thats you, baby. And you didnt even give a **** that it happened.
If the alternative was to stay where they're likely to be shot, then what?
You mean like the hoods in Chicago?
:lamoGlad to see you love Russia so much. Maybe you, like Trump, would like to see the US under autocratic rule as well.
Bull****. The difference is you didnt care about it during the Obama administration because it happened during the Obama administration.ANd you dont care about it now as anything more than a political ploy. You dont give a **** about them.You see, the difference is that Obama didn't take the children away from their parents. You're comparing apples to road apples in a vain attempt to justify the unjustifiable.
The lengths to which Trump's true believers will go to make everything he does right and good is just astounding.
Why do gops support baby cages and institutionalized child abuse?
Having to eat microwave meals isn't child abuse.
How many MREs did you have to eat?Exclusively? It's demoralizing. Is unintentionally demoralizing children abuse? Neglect perhaps.
The funny part is that the living conditions in those Obama cages including the food is a radical step UP from what they knew in their own ****hole countries. Cant blame them for wanting to escape.Having to eat microwave meals isn't child abuse.
How many MREs did you have to eat?
1-Was it abuse? Neglect? Hell no. Stop the drama queen bull****1. I was an adult.
2. I did that for my country.
3. I volunteered and was paid well (~$1500/month, after taxes, living in the barracks and eating in the cafeteria so no living expenses - all of it disposable, early '90s so adjust for inflation). Plus ~70k for school.
4. Even high speed low drag troops have some pogie bait.
5. There was an established end date to hardship, which would be home.
6. We had cigarettes.
7. We were like a family. We had each other.
Do I need to continue before you see the catastrophe of your comparison.
3. They volunteered to leave their countries and illegally attempt to enbter here.
Exclusively? It's demoralizing. Is unintentionally demoralizing children abuse? Neglect perhaps.
Uh no.
If you jump the border, you don't get steak and pork chops and if that hurts your little feelings then don't break the law.
:lamo
I dont love Putin. I have never said ANYTHING complimentary of Putin. I know exactly who he is and what he is. Leftists on the other hand? You people have been so easily ****ed by your own party and you just take it over and over and over.
They ****ed you in 2012 with "Russia"
Notice how easily it was all coordinated. Media...party....talking heads...politicians...all using the same mindless empty headed rheotric...and you swallowed it and begged for more.
And they gave it to you.
When the democrats got caught with their pants down and the contents of their emails got exposed showing just how corrupt they are and how they were ****ing half their voting base, rather than answer for it, what did they do? You know. RUSSIA!!!! RUSSIA!!!!! RUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSIIIIIIIAAAAAAAA!!!!
Over and over...Hillary regurgitated it...all the rats regurgitated it. They KNEW you would swallow it and do their work for them. And you did. And still are.
Its ****ing embarrassing watching how easily you are manipulated.
"After all, you don't call Russia our No. 1 enemy -- not Al-Qaida, Russia -- unless you're still stuck in a Cold War mind warp,"
:lamo
Good one. I stopped there, you can't top that.
You can’t argue against the truth. I understand
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Obama ridiculed Romney for correctly pointing out he folly of Obama capitulating to Russia and sacrificing air defense systems in their favor. Romney was 100% correct about Russia. Obama used his ‘flexibility’ to cave to Russia...but that was OK the , because they didn’t need to use The Russia Baba Yaga to frighten and manipulate their voters. Then.I have to keep reminding you that I'm really only one person. I realize that it's difficult to see how any one person could come up with spot on arguments all by himself, but that's how it is, really.
Now, here's Obama's statement about Russia being our enemy:
Note, he didn't say Russia wasn't an enemy, and note that this was before Russia hacked into the DNC, but nevertheless, he did say it wasn't our #1 enemy. Maybe #2, right after AlQaeda.
Whether "the left," whoever they are, still agrees with that statement or not, I can't say. I see you do, and Trump does, but I'm not so sure. It might be true, but then again, it depends. Which one is #1 and which one is #2 is a matter of opinion.
What has become abundantly clear is that Trump considers the US news media and his own intelligence less credible than that #1 or #2 enemy.
Obama ridiculed Romney for correctly pointing out he folly of Obama capitulating to Russia and sacrificing air defense systems in their favor. Romney was 100% correct about Russia. Obama used his ‘flexibility’ to cave to Russia...but that was OK the , because they didn’t need to use The Russia Baba Yaga to frighten and manipulate their voters. Then.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?