But you do have to have sex with her for her to claim it is yours.
Her: honey, we're pregnant! You're going to be a father!
Him: How? We haven't had sex yet!
Sent from my cp3705A using Tapatalk
Its actually pretty rareMaybe rare that it ends up in court, but it is certainly not a rare scenario and I’d bet a lot of cases are not known about at least by the poor sucker
Not what I said. You made the statement that a man (A) doesn't have to have sex with a woman for another man (B) to impregnate her. A true enough statement. But how is the woman supposed to accuse man A of being the father, when man A never had sex with her?So a man shouldn't have sex if he doesn't want to risk being victimized for 18 years?
Not what I said. You made the statement that a man (A) doesn't have to have sex with a woman for another man (B) to impregnate her. A true enough statement. But how is the woman supposed to accuse man A of being the father, when man A never had sex with her?
Its actually pretty rare
Bothwhich scenario? Court or the sucker not knowing
Both
Your entire one post runs counter to your point of this thread. You said:Your statement is true but it shouldn't be relevant. If it's relevant then a man does indeed need to abstain from sex to avoid the possibility of 18 years on the hook for a child he was deceived into believing is his.
I think you're confused. You don't need to have sex with a woman for her to be impregnated by another man.
Relatively rarehow about the sucker knowing but never saying anything
I believe that is what family court judges do. They do have some discretion.In most cases, no. But I think it should be looked at on a case by case basis, what were the circumstances?
Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
If they're not married, and she's preg, he can...and would be smart to...request a DNA test. They can wait to get married, cant they? He should worry if she tries to get him hitched sooner. I think the whole big wedding thing is a waste of $$, so not very sympathetic to women who put their whole lives on hold to plan them. But men need to look out for their best interests too. It's like asking for a pre-nup...uncomfortable but smart (not that everyone needs that).So a man shouldn't have sex if he doesn't want to risk being victimized for 18 years?
No. The real father can pay for his kid.
Why should he get stuck paying for a kid that he did not want, had no say in not having and was denied the right to see and that he has no bond with?
Because he's the biological father and he should bare the responsibility for his biological child over some poor SOB that was cheated on and lied to.
He was lied to and probably cheated on as well...
You dont know any of that stuff happened. Even if it did....its his kidWhy should he get stuck paying for a kid that he did not want, had no say in not having and was denied the right to see and that he has no bond with?
I am actually shocked at the argument you are trying to make.
You dont know any of that stuff happened. Even if it did....its his kid
Yes. I do.
Yes it's his kid. Pay for itYes. I do.
Plans don't always go according to plan. Only way to guarantee such is to either no have sex with any woman, limit sex to women with no uterus, or get your own testicles removed. Everything else runs at least some risk.Lucky for me, I don't plan to have kids.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?