To bare arms? I dont think the monarchy would agree with that, we may end our "subject of the crown" status and become complete citizens.
why is that?Very wonderful at times and at others it is annoying as hell.
It is a love/hate relationship
why is that?
It breached his fundemental human rights, the gov accepted the ruling and agreed they were wrong, we all have the same fundemental rights,so do you want them for some, and not for others, if so why did you start this thread?Because cases like this come up:
Britain was wrong to freeze assets of Abu Qatada, rules EU, clearing way for him to get compensation | Mail Online
EU court orders release of Abu Qatada assets | UK news | guardian.co.uk
We should have the right to freeze the assets of a nutter without Europe jumping down our throats.
Congratulations!! You guys voted for all that ****. No guns, no juries and a socialist state.BBC NEWS | UK | First trial without jury approved
Dangerous, knowing our Govt. this will become common.
I don't like this at all, what the heck is going on with our system.
Does anyone even know who our law lords are and we are supposed to trust them :roll:
Congratulations!! You guys voted for all that ****. No guns, no juries and a socialist state.
Why did you start this thread, you seemed worried that the law lords were removing these fine gentleman's fundamental rights to trial by jury, and then the Government extending its use.Oh please, fundamental rights :roll:
Clearly we will never agree on EU.
We need them economic wise, but they should never have a say on Governmental issues.
Congratulations!! You guys voted for all that ****. No guns, no juries and a socialist state.
Why did you start this thread, you seemed worried that the law lords were removing these fine gentleman's fundamental rights to trial by jury, and then the Government extending its use.
You cant have it both ways and not appear to be a hypocrite
BBC NEWS | UK | First trial without jury approved
Dangerous, knowing our Govt. this will become common.
I don't like this at all, what the heck is going on with our system.
Does anyone even know who our law lords are and we are supposed to trust them :roll:
Emergency powers would need a vote,the European Court of Human Rights was established in 1952, it will hear cases from individuals or states, it is a fine safety net.A Government should have emergency powers in times of need, what is needed is the ability to keep that Governments use of power in check but i'd much rather it be our legislative/committees who have this ability who are elected and chosen by us the people rather than a hand from Brussels making judgements from afar but for that to happen reform would be needed of the political system which we might be getting if Brown has anything to do with it.
In the U.S. trials by jury are usually reserved for Felony (more serious) charges, in what we call "Superior" courts.
Misdemeanor charges are handled in District courts by a single presiding judge. Misdemeanor verdicts can be appealed to a superior court judge for judicial review or for an opportunity to have a jury hear the case, but this usually doesn't happen that often.
Well ... we'll edit the US Constitution before implementing it then. I don't think the public would accept legalizing guns.
Besides i love the Queen and so do many others. Charles ... not so much.
Again I ask what was your reason for starting this thread?
What is your opinion of the European Court of Justice?
why? Sometimes there are 3 judges, they "vote" the sentence
but maybe our laws are different. Here, they are quite precise, everything is written and the judges only apply it
Not because of my vote.Lmao.
Look ahead to a few decades and it might just happen to you ... :2wave:
Oh and i would hardly call Labour socialist.
They are almost light blue.
Thus it is inconceivable to many in the US that you would have a trial without a jury.
Just say that trail by jury is a bad thing. We don't need a lesson on our own system from you.And yet you have things like grand juries that are held in secret, and your whole appeal system is without juries.
And yet you have things like grand juries that are held in secret, and your whole appeal system is without juries.
Please dont call me dear, I am very expensiveErm, i know you've been here for a while so i am sure you of all people are aware that this is the NEWS sections. Yes dear, news. That is where we report things that have happened in the world.
Now what we do is find a article we think people should know or might like to comment on and then post it .... shockingly enough, i believed that seeing this is the first time it will be occuring in history it was worth a mention .... :roll:
I don't mind it generally.
Please dont call me dear, I am very expensive
Just say that trail by jury is a bad thing. We don't need a lesson on our own system from you.
Grand juries are not held in secret, we know where they are at. In fact a friend of mine got assigned to one in Denver. And they don't convict either, the only think a grand jury does is decide if there is enough evidence to proceed with an actual trial. The appeal system is very similar.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?