• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A question

Craig234

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
58,375
Reaction score
29,675
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Should anyone be allowed to say their religion told them thousands of years ago they're given land, and to violently take that land from the people on it, take their positions, kill people, etc., or should only the rogue stayed be allowed to do that, but not others? If only them, what is the justification to only let them do it? Or should laws about legal national behavior, sovereignty, human rights, etc. apply regardless of their religious claims?
 
Should anyone be allowed to say their religion told them thousands of years ago they're given land, and to violently take that land from the people on it, take their positions, kill people, etc.

No. They shouldn't. Neither Israelis nor Palestinians are entitled to the current property of the other, regardless of what their religion claims or whether or not it was stolen from their ancestors.
 
Should anyone be allowed to say their religion told them thousands of years ago they're given land, and to violently take that land from the people on it, take their positions, kill people, etc., or should only the rogue stayed be allowed to do that, but not others? If only them, what is the justification to only let them do it? Or should laws about legal national behavior, sovereignty, human rights, etc. apply regardless of their religious claims?
It was not a thousand of years ago. It was only just over 500 years ago. If it was about legal rights then who does america belong to?
https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/doctrine-discovery-1493
The Papal Bull "Inter Caetera," issued by Pope Alexander VI on May 4, 1493, played a central role in the Spanish conquest of the New World. The Bull stated that any land not inhabited by Christians was available to be "discovered," claimed, and exploited by Christian rulers and declared that "the Catholic faith and the Christian religion be exalted and be everywhere increased and spread, that the health of souls be cared for and that barbarous nations be overthrown and brought to the faith itself." This "Doctrine of Discovery" became the basis of all European claims in the Americas as well as the foundation for the United States’ western expansion. In the US Supreme Court in the 1823 case Johnson v. McIntosh, Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in the unanimous decision held "that the principle of discovery gave European nations an absolute right to New World lands." In essence, American Indians had only a right of occupancy, which could be abolished.
 
Back
Top Bottom