He has partial/incomplete information because he doesn't listen to it, not because it doesn't exist. Trump has dismissed the unanimous consensus of every single scientific organization on the planet on climate change, every medical organization on the planet on vaccines and healthcare, all the economists on the economy, and his own intel on foreign affairs.Trump has to make decisions with partial/incomplete information that can also be potentially wrong. You can spend days or weeks deliberating your decisions, you can bring in outside experts (with their own agenda) using some sort of voting logic but in the end, it's just a guess. If that's all it is, you can just as well quickly make that guess yourself. Opportunities don't last forever. Last thing you want is to be frozen in indecisiveness.
"Trump is the stupid man's idea of a smart man, the poor man's idea of a wealthy man, and the weak man's idea of a strong man."
It appears that Trump makes decisions very quickly (classic system one), often without extensive deliberation or consultation with advisers. Both in his presidency and in his business career, he seemed to prioritise immediate action over any sort of prolonged and thoughtful analysis. That’s why he changes his mind so often.
Trump’s f-bomb: a psychologist explains why the president makes fast and furious statements
Donald Trump appears to react quickly and emotionallly to foreign policy decisions, a psychologist explains why that could be.theconversation.com
Very interesting article. I'm going to parse out some it here, but its well worth a read...
"The Nobel laureate and psychologist Daniel Kahneman, in his book Thinking Fast and Slow (2011), characterised the two systems that underpin everyday decision-making. His work may help with understanding of what’s going on here."
"He describes system one as the evolutionary, basic system. It operates unconsciously, automatically and very quickly, handling everyday tasks like reading other people’s emotions, without any effort. It is an intuitive system designed to work in a world full of approach and avoidance, scary animals and friendly animals. It is heavily reliant on affect to guide decision-making."
"In contrast, system two is slower, more deliberative. It requires conscious effort and is used for complex thinking, solving difficult problems, or making careful decisions."
"The relationship between the two systems is critical, and that may get us thinking about Trump in more detail."
Makes sense.
He goes on to explain that system one is "on" all the time, and "often jumps quickly and unconsciously to certain conclusions. System two should check them, but often doesn’t..."
"It appears that Trump makes decisions very quickly (classic system one), often without extensive deliberation or consultation with advisers. Both in his presidency and in his business career, he seemed to prioritise immediate action over any sort of prolonged and thoughtful analysis. That’s why he changes his mind so often."
So, he prioritizes decisiveness and quick action over thoughtful deliberation. Yes. he clealry does.
"His decisions seem to be driven by strong emotions. His response to events, opponents and issues are often passionate and visceral. This could lead to to decisions being unduly influenced by personal feelings, first impressions based on arbitrary cues, and interpersonal perceptions, rather than anything more substantial."
We just bombed Iran because Trump had "a feeling" they were close to building a nuclear weapon. His own intel people say they was no evidence of such.
"Trump’s style of decision-making emphasises immediacy and emotional conviction, which can be effective in rallying supporters and creating a sense of decisiveness. However, it also can lead to unpredictable outcomes and, as has been seen again and again, somewhat controversial, impulsive actions."
Quite an understatement.
Trump's "System two" is not functioning.
Do tell. What exactly did you glean from your one look?One look at Geoff Beattie's (the "Professor) "activity" his webpage kinda tells you all you need to know about his predelictions for all things non-Trump.
Which ones?As for what looks like your own contributions to your post ... they were either wrong or supported by anonymous leaks.
Which ones?Not a good practice to use them to form the conclusions you did.
One look at Geoff Beattie's (the "Professor) "activity" his webpage kinda tells you all you need to know about his predelictions for all things non-Trump.
As for what looks like your own contributions to your post ... they were either wrong or supported by anonymous leaks.
Not a good practice to use them to form the conclusions you did.
You haven't noticed his flip-flops? Really?I'm sorry but which of Trumps actions have been quick and without thought?
Everything he has done he has talked about for ages.
He has some immediate decisions to make like with Iran but that's to be expected with the job.
So what exactly are you folks referring to?
Flip flops or strategy?You haven't noticed his flip-flops? Really?
Click on his name and read the pieces he wrote under "activity"Do tell. What exactly did you glean from your one look?
Which ones?
Anonymous holdover leaker from what is probably the DIA. Was it?Which ones?
Near as I can tell, Beattie is who used Kahneman's observations to fit his own biased observations about Trump. And since K's book was written in 2011 it's kind of Beattie's useless opinion about Trump.What about the thr information attributed to Nobel laureate and psychologist Daniel Kahneman?
Did you read the article?
You don't know what you learned from your one look?Click on his name and read the pieces he wrote under "activity"
???Anonymous holdover leaker from what is probably the DIA. Was it?
You are entitled to your equally useless and far less educated opinions.Near as I can tell, Beattie is who used Kahneman's observations to fit his own biased observations about Trump. And since K's book was written in 2011 it's kind of Beattie's useless opinion about Trump.
You think Trump has a good track record? At what?Besides, if a track record is as good as Trump's, does it matter how fast he makes things happen?
Uh huh.Ya know for someone who can't bring themselves to admit they were jerked around for over 8 years by sources like yours, you are the one who should be more careful drawing quick conclusions.
I learned he is biased, he used a different authors work as though that author supported him, it’s now being reported that multiple intel sources concluded that the damage is severe, what were Trump’s failures?"What exactly did you glean from your one look?"
You don't know what you learned from your one look?
???
You are entitled to your equally useless and far less educated opinions.
You think Trump has a good track record? At what?
Uh huh.
So nothing specific. Vague stuff. What about the rest of the article? Did you actually read it?I learned he is biased, he used a different authors work as though that author supported him, it’s now being reported that multiple intel sources concluded that the damage is severe, what were Trump’s failures?
It’s clear that you’ll selectively choose anything that aligns with what you believe.
He is still sharper than Trump.You still believe Biden was mentally sharp?
???That the laptop was fake?
They certainly tried to help.That Russia got Trump elected?
If you can prove that...but then again, you are a trumper, so you already have been duped.Will you never learn that you’ve been, and continually to be, duped?
uh huh.Maybe you like it like that.
ROTFLOL...Flip flops or strategy?
AI OverviewGood quote, where is it from?
Flip flops or strategy?
Good quote, where is it from?
Never send an AI to do a man's job. The earliest attribution I can find is from 27 February 2017 on itsamoneything.com, where it's attributed to B. J. LeidermanAI Overview
The provided quote is a subjective observation about Donald Trump and is not attributed to a specific source in the search results
There you go. Still clinging to the scams long after their death.So nothing specific. Vague stuff. What about the rest of the article? Did you actually read it?
He is still sharper than Trump.
???
They certainly tried to help.
If you can prove that...but then again, you are a trumper, so you already have been duped.
uh huh.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?