• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

A new paper has been published questioning the Apocalyptic climate narrative

Whatever floats your bubble. Whoever has understood the science and believes in what 97% of the world's scientists are telling us will go with their assessment, not that of some wonky noodles.
 
Whatever floats your bubble. Whoever has understood the science and believes in what 97% of the world's scientists are telling us will go with their assessment, not that of some wonky noodles.
One of the Authors Judith Curry is one of the foremost climate scientist in the world.
 
In giant bold all caps from your link:

IS GLOBAL WARMING DANGEROUS?​

From my ever increasing file:

1. More rain is not a problem.
2. Warmer weather is not a problem.
3. More arable land is not a problem.
4. Longer growing seasons is not a problem.
5. CO2 greening of the earth is not a problem.
6. There isn't any Climate Crisis.
 
One of the Authors Judith Curry is one of the foremost climate scientist in the world.
I did say 97% but you find one of a different opinion and she is right and everyone else is wrong. Ignorance is a universal failing but I would at least endeavor NOT to be ignorant and strive to make sense of the science rather than rely on one or even a half dozen who want to get noticed for going against the science.
I will tell you something else you won't like. Sit down with ANY highschool student. You don't need to be a scientist. Ask them to explain how unusually high CO2 omissions are create and then ask them to explain how that effects the climate. It is beyond me that in the year 2025 there are still people out there so ignorant about how things work that a mere highschool student can explain things to them that they should know themselves.
 
One of the Authors Judith Curry is one of the foremost climate scientist in the world.
Oh I forgot to mention, since you brought up Judith Curry...............

Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Climate Etc is the blog of Judith A. Curry, who is an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. The blog publishes news and information regarding climate science and climate change from a skeptical perspective. She was a member of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Committee, published over a hundred scientific papers, and co-edited several significant works. Curry retired from academia in 2017.

The website publishes blog posts by Judith Curry related to climate change, and they provide links to other sources that also promote human-influenced climate change denial, such as Watts Up With That and John Stossel, who is not even remotely a climate scientist. The consensus of climate scientists is that climate change is human-influenced, and this site minimizes that assessment. They have also failed numerous fact-checks.

Man oh man, you picked the biggest fruitcake of them all to source your information. I can't even imagine how embarrassing this is going to be for you.
 
Oh I forgot to mention, since you brought up Judith Curry...............

Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Climate Etc is the blog of Judith A. Curry, who is an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. The blog publishes news and information regarding climate science and climate change from a skeptical perspective. She was a member of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Committee, published over a hundred scientific papers, and co-edited several significant works. Curry retired from academia in 2017.

The website publishes blog posts by Judith Curry related to climate change, and they provide links to other sources that also promote human-influenced climate change denial, such as Watts Up With That and John Stossel, who is not even remotely a climate scientist. The consensus of climate scientists is that climate change is human-influenced, and this site minimizes that assessment. They have also failed numerous fact-checks.

Man oh man, you picked the biggest fruitcake of them all to source your information. I can't even imagine how embarrassing this is going to be for you.
Have you read any of her peer reviewed studies?
Forget what people like cook say at skeptical science, Curry is an actual scientist as opposed to a cartoonist.
 
Have you read any of her peer reviewed studies?
Forget what people like cook say at skeptical science, Curry is an actual scientist as opposed to a cartoonist.
She is a fruitcake. I didn't just link Cook. Read my other rebuttal..............#5

Someone who might be an actual scientist but when she is one amongst thousands and you believe the one ..................... I don't think I need to finish the sentence.
 
She is a fruitcake. I didn't just link Cook. Read my other rebuttal..............#5

Someone who might be an actual scientist but when she is one amongst thousands and you believe the one ..................... I don't think I need to finish the sentence.
I noticed you didn’t answer the question,
Have you ever read any of her peer reviewed studies?
 
I noticed you didn’t answer the question,
Have you ever read any of her peer reviewed studies?
I don't need to. And do you know why? I can go over to the local high school in my area and ask any student "How is man made CO2 created and how does CO2 effect the climate?" and they could give me an answer. This is all basic science and common knowledge. I don't need to read some tripe from ONE fruitcake when even without her credentials I know how the science of climate change works. Ignorance is something I wouldn't be proud of, if there are some who prefer to remain ignorant, that is on them.
 
I don't need to. And do you know why? I can go over to the local high school in my area and ask any student "How is man made CO2 created and how does CO2 effect the climate?" and they could give me an answer. This is all basic science and common knowledge. I don't need to read some tripe from ONE fruitcake when even without her credentials I know how the science of climate change works. Ignorance is something I wouldn't be proud of, if there are some who prefer to remain ignorant, that is on them.
Don’t like real science?
 
I did say 97% but you find one of a different opinion and she is right and everyone else is wrong. Ignorance is a universal failing but I would at least endeavor NOT to be ignorant and strive to make sense of the science rather than rely on one or even a half dozen who want to get noticed for going against the science.
I will tell you something else you won't like. Sit down with ANY highschool student. You don't need to be a scientist. Ask them to explain how unusually high CO2 omissions are create and then ask them to explain how that effects the climate. It is beyond me that in the year 2025 there are still people out there so ignorant about how things work that a mere highschool student can explain things to them that they should know themselves.
CO2 is currently low and has no effct on climate because green plants convert it to O2 and that ability increases exponentially. The sun creates climate let me know when you can control that. Climate change is a gig used as an excuse to expand government cnd control our lives. Not one dire prediction has ever come true so they move the goalposts every 10 years.
 
Whatever floats your bubble. Whoever has understood the science and believes in what 97% of the world's scientists are telling us will go with their assessment, not that of some wonky noodles.
That 97% is not stated to be over 99%, but is nothing more than agreeing we have an impact.

Stop listening to the pundits that lie about what the scientists say.
 
In giant bold all caps from your link:

IS GLOBAL WARMING DANGEROUS?​

From my ever increasing file:

1. More rain is not a problem.
2. Warmer weather is not a problem.
3. More arable land is not a problem.
4. Longer growing seasons is not a problem.
5. CO2 greening of the earth is not a problem.
6. There isn't any Climate Crisis.
They only look at a few negative hypothetical unproven claims, and do not recognize how the changing climate is actually better for life on earth. More CO2 and the plant life flourishes more.
 
Oh I forgot to mention, since you brought up Judith Curry...............

Bias Rating: PSEUDOSCIENCE
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: Minimal Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History

Climate Etc is the blog of Judith A. Curry, who is an American climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology. The blog publishes news and information regarding climate science and climate change from a skeptical perspective. She was a member of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Committee, published over a hundred scientific papers, and co-edited several significant works. Curry retired from academia in 2017.

The website publishes blog posts by Judith Curry related to climate change, and they provide links to other sources that also promote human-influenced climate change denial, such as Watts Up With That and John Stossel, who is not even remotely a climate scientist. The consensus of climate scientists is that climate change is human-influenced, and this site minimizes that assessment. They have also failed numerous fact-checks.

Man oh man, you picked the biggest fruitcake of them all to source your information. I can't even imagine how embarrassing this is going to be for you.
Who ever is making that rating for Curry's site, is a flat out liar.
 
Don't you dare question the prophecy, if you didn't buy every bit of the impending doom you are facing you are a heretic/ denier.
You are correct.

We are heretics for questioning the cults Bible.
 
The sun creates climate let me know when you can control that.
Oh the fossil fuel industry is already in control of that. They're pumping 40+ billion tons of polluting emissions, annually, into our air and admitting that it is changing climate. What they don't want to admit is that the particulate matter from the burning of their products is killing people with lung diseases by the thousands.
 
CO2 is currently low and has no effct on climate because green plants convert it to O2 and that ability increases exponentially. The sun creates climate let me know when you can control that. Climate change is a gig used as an excuse to expand government cnd control our lives. Not one dire prediction has ever come true so they move the goalposts every 10 years.
I am not even going to rebut your comment.

disappointed_40x40.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom